Jump to content

Recommended Posts

12 years old? 13 -14 years old?


This is the result of no fcking discipline in both the schools and the home. This is the result of adults being too scared to take a youngster to task for low level behaviour.


We now a an entire generation who are simply no longer scared of authority of any sort. The next time one of the Loony Left suggests any sort of progressive moddy-coddling - think of this night.


Lawlessness. Muggings. Fear. Fire. Homes and business owned and built over generations destroyed.


I doubt I will be sleeping tonight. I will be spending the night defending my home, my neighbours and my street.


With a fcking cricket bat. What will you do if it reaches your front door?

whibel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a context to London's riots that can't be

> ignored

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

> 8/context-london-riots


I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the streets looting have spent all but one of those years under a Labour government. Any responsibility there?

I was swimming with my toddler in Peckham Pool 5-6 pm. Pool shut and let people out but not in. They let us out from back door so we would be closer to car, but car was blocked just outside on the main street because of rioters. We could not moved for ten minutes and I was terrified for my little one in the back as youth was walking past with stones, etc. Finally two policemen noticed the 5 blocked cars and managed to move bus out of the way. Got as far as the pharmacy (ABC?) at the big traffic lights when we had to veer off towards Goose Green because of the burning bus on the main road. Some kids with metal chairs smashed a car just two cars ahead of me, which had slowed down to let some pedestrains through. Finally got home going via Dogkennel Hill... Boy safe in bed now, but what the hell is going on?!

whibel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a context to London's riots that can't be ignored

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/context-london-riots


Honestly, really and truly just f-off with the sodding hug-a-hoodie context. Just send in the damn army if there are not enough cops. The little twunts that robbed and smashed windows in LL didn't do it because of any social context - they did it because they knew the police are stretched to the limit and they can get away with it.


Take your socks and sandals somewhere else.

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

In seriousness: I am afraid. I am

> appalled. I am disgusted by a police force that

> has forgotten how to use force.

>

> I have the front door on double-lock and the

> baseball bat in the hall, and I am glad not to

> live near the high street.



This is not the police's fault so why are you disgusted by them?

whibel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a context to London's riots that can't be

> ignored

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

> 8/context-london-riots


Utter Tosh - these people have no 'cause', they looked like they were having a 'right laugh' on the news footage. Mindless violence, detsroying homes, businesses and lives - I struggle to find a justifiable context to that.......

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> whibel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There is a context to London's riots that can't

> be

> > ignored

> >

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

>

> > 8/context-london-riots

>

> I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the streets

> looting have spent all but one of those years

> under a Labour government. Any responsibility

> there?


yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your cupcakes.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> whibel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There is a context to London's riots that can't

> be

> > ignored

> >

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

>

> > 8/context-london-riots

>

> I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the streets

> looting have spent all but one of those years

> under a Labour government. Any responsibility

> there?


yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your cupcakes, etc.

Hang on. Wasn't it just last year that Teresa may said she could cut police forces because British people didn't riot? Sorry, but there is wider context. Reducing it to "hug a hoodie" is risible


We can all (and do) condemn the thugs as much as we like. Teresa may spent an eternity doing it earlier tonight. But it doesn't achieve anything. These aren't people who respond to being chided


As for army and water cannons etc? Do people not have any me,ories of any other parts or the world or even uk, and how "successful" they were.


Calm heads required, not overreaction.


Watching the whole thing unfold tonight I was surprised to not see police go in harder earlier. I then heard them say "well...people give out when we get tough"


Yes.. With peaceful protests, not idiots like tonight

It is a moronic article. The riots have nothing to do with anything referred to by Nina Power. Don't get the hump just because people read something that looks like utter tripe and comment on it. From the looks of it, the rioting is nothing to do with austerity cuts and more to do with copy catting what is on TV in the context of the police being too busy to deal with it.


What sort of social protest does nicking fags from Londis and trainers from Footlocker in Brixton make...?



whibel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > whibel Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > There is a context to London's riots that

> can't

> > be

> > > ignored

> > >

> >

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

>

> >

> > > 8/context-london-riots

> >

> > I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the

> streets

> > looting have spent all but one of those years

> > under a Labour government. Any responsibility

> > there?

>

> yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your

> folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your

> cupcakes, etc.

whibel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > whibel Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > There is a context to London's riots that

> can't

> > be

> > > ignored

> > >

> >

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0

>

> >

> > > 8/context-london-riots

> >

> > I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the

> streets

> > looting have spent all but one of those years

> > under a Labour government. Any responsibility

> > there?

>

> yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your

> folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your

> cupcakes, etc.


And thanks for not answering my reasonable question. I'm not a Tory and I don't eat cupcakes.

Adam999 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is not the police's fault so why are you

> disgusted by them?


in response to my comment that I am disgusted by a police force that has forgot how to use force.


Hey, Adam999. Thanks for asking.


Let me divide up the "this" in your response.


The throwing of bricks through windows and the setting afire of buses is not the police's fault. Agreed.


The failure to act swiftly, and forcefully, to END those events... Isn't that the police's fault? Point for debate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's not far from Lordship Lane if you cut down Ashbourne Grove/Melbourne Grove. Depends where you start from, I guess!
    • I doubt if it was something special - it has been full a few times I've been recently and when I have been able to get a space I've been lucky and bagged the only one available. I think there are only around 15 general spaces. Others are for staff, blue badge holders or EVs. I guess in winter people are more likely to drive, it wouldn't take much to fill all the spaces with the different things going on at the surgery/pharmacy such as blood tests, picking up prescriptions. It's possible a lot of the cars are in and out in 15 mins, i've not monitored it closely. This morning with all spaces filled when I arrived there were a couple of cars loitering in the hope of a space becoming available. I didn't want to risk it. As has been said, you can drive in and out and be caught on camera and not get a ticket but I'm not sure what the grace period is, if there is one.  Like you, I don't think a significant number of people are parking there to go shopping - it's too far from Lordship Lane as I found out this morning when i had to run from LL to Tessa Jowell! i guess the car parking spaces just can't cope with the number of legit drivers using Tessa Jowell and if that's the case not a lot can be done about it.
    • Wanted near Bellenden Road: firewood. If you have any spare or unwanted firewood (e.g. left by previous owners), please let me know. Thanks!
    • I go there quite regularly (don't ask), on my own behalf and as a chauffeur for family. I have never noted people parking up, going in and then straight out again once registered. Some times of day (and some days) are much busier than others, as you might expect, especially during winter vaccination season. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...