Jump to content

Recommended Posts

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of Spurs remaining fixtures I only see them

> collecting 3 points against Bolton, and 1 at

> Sunderland.

>

> Sunderland v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Arsenal They can't win this?

> Tottenham v Chelsea They can't win this?

> Man Utd v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Bolton

> Man City v Tottenham They can draw this!

>

> For Liverpool what I have put in brackets

>

> Liverpool v Sunderland (3)

> Birmingham v Liverpool (1)

> Liverpool v Fulham (3)

> Liverpool v West Ham (3)

> Burnley v Liverpool (0) Who loses at Burnley? (apart from ManU)

> Liverpool v Chelsea (1)

> Hull v Liverpool (0 )Can't win at Hull?

>

> Which by my calculations means they will finish on

> same points as Spurs and it will be decided on

> goal difference, which based on number of forecast

> wins and defeats should mean the Reds pip Spurs.

>

> EDITED to say I forgot Spurs last game of season

> away at Burnley, so that makes Spurs by a margin

> of 3 points!


I'd forget your calculations Matthew. I think they are all over the place.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let us just agree then Narnia that Spurs will do

> their usual handbag performance when they play

> United


I'd be delighted though I seem to remember they were 2 up last season at OT before the ref intervened and brought MU back into it.

Good to see there is still some honour in Football Management, as Zola considers his future overnight to whether it is he that is the problem for what is happening on the pitch down at West Ham.


"I need to find out what is the problem - and if the problem is me. I will have to think about that overnight. I don't think it's that the players are not trying. The bottom line is to see whether I can help them or not."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/8591141.stm

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A stiker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > Bentner but for months they had to play without

> a

> > striker.

>

> Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott. Ummm....are

> they not strikers then?

>


Jah


Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season without a goal scoring centre forward......"


Thats pretty much the point I was making.


As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and me know more than thee :)

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

> > -----

> > > A striker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > > Bentner but for months they had to play

> without

> > a

> > > striker.

> >

> > Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott.

> Ummm....are

> > they not strikers then?

> >

>

> Jah

>

> Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said

> "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season

> without a goal scoring centre forward......"

>

> Thats pretty much the point I was making.

>

> As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and

> me know more than thee :)



He said a centre forward. You said striker. There are different types of strikers are there not? If you'd said centre forward I'd have agreed with you but you didn't you said striker. Perhaps next time you'll be more specific.

Striker = Centre Forward to most people Jah?. You can have lots of forwards but the striker is the one that plays front and centre. Thats what Arsenal have had to play without.


But good to know you would have agreed with me had I used the right terminology.


More importantly Arsenal have played the whole season with a crap goalkeeper as further evidenced on Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...