Jump to content

Recommended Posts

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of Spurs remaining fixtures I only see them

> collecting 3 points against Bolton, and 1 at

> Sunderland.

>

> Sunderland v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Arsenal They can't win this?

> Tottenham v Chelsea They can't win this?

> Man Utd v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Bolton

> Man City v Tottenham They can draw this!

>

> For Liverpool what I have put in brackets

>

> Liverpool v Sunderland (3)

> Birmingham v Liverpool (1)

> Liverpool v Fulham (3)

> Liverpool v West Ham (3)

> Burnley v Liverpool (0) Who loses at Burnley? (apart from ManU)

> Liverpool v Chelsea (1)

> Hull v Liverpool (0 )Can't win at Hull?

>

> Which by my calculations means they will finish on

> same points as Spurs and it will be decided on

> goal difference, which based on number of forecast

> wins and defeats should mean the Reds pip Spurs.

>

> EDITED to say I forgot Spurs last game of season

> away at Burnley, so that makes Spurs by a margin

> of 3 points!


I'd forget your calculations Matthew. I think they are all over the place.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let us just agree then Narnia that Spurs will do

> their usual handbag performance when they play

> United


I'd be delighted though I seem to remember they were 2 up last season at OT before the ref intervened and brought MU back into it.

Good to see there is still some honour in Football Management, as Zola considers his future overnight to whether it is he that is the problem for what is happening on the pitch down at West Ham.


"I need to find out what is the problem - and if the problem is me. I will have to think about that overnight. I don't think it's that the players are not trying. The bottom line is to see whether I can help them or not."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/8591141.stm

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A stiker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > Bentner but for months they had to play without

> a

> > striker.

>

> Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott. Ummm....are

> they not strikers then?

>


Jah


Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season without a goal scoring centre forward......"


Thats pretty much the point I was making.


As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and me know more than thee :)

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

> > -----

> > > A striker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > > Bentner but for months they had to play

> without

> > a

> > > striker.

> >

> > Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott.

> Ummm....are

> > they not strikers then?

> >

>

> Jah

>

> Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said

> "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season

> without a goal scoring centre forward......"

>

> Thats pretty much the point I was making.

>

> As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and

> me know more than thee :)



He said a centre forward. You said striker. There are different types of strikers are there not? If you'd said centre forward I'd have agreed with you but you didn't you said striker. Perhaps next time you'll be more specific.

Striker = Centre Forward to most people Jah?. You can have lots of forwards but the striker is the one that plays front and centre. Thats what Arsenal have had to play without.


But good to know you would have agreed with me had I used the right terminology.


More importantly Arsenal have played the whole season with a crap goalkeeper as further evidenced on Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Supermarkets have massive volume and tiny profit margins. If this were true Ocado would be dead by the end of the week, surely.
    • The step means Love Dulwich is not disabled friendly though they went to help someone on  crutches up the step last time we were there  much prefer it as a Turkish than café but maybe not for this group   The noise level might be an issue as it’s all hard surfaces though I don’t recall it being noisy. check out Olivelli the menu has a good range  though it’s not the best Italian you can get. There’s also a step up into Maria’s - much smaller but you need to negotiate the step and door at the same time. Olivelli has more room and if I remember right the toilets are on the ground floor. A consideration if steps are an issue The Lordship might be an option. Noise is not usually an issue. We’ve enjoyed various meals there. The ladies toilets are on the same floor as the tables (the gents may be upstairs). The staff are always friendly
    • It’s about chains, and the ethos of family run business versus unhealthy competition 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...