Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of Spurs remaining fixtures I only see them

> collecting 3 points against Bolton, and 1 at

> Sunderland.

>

> Sunderland v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Arsenal They can't win this?

> Tottenham v Chelsea They can't win this?

> Man Utd v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Bolton

> Man City v Tottenham They can draw this!

>

> For Liverpool what I have put in brackets

>

> Liverpool v Sunderland (3)

> Birmingham v Liverpool (1)

> Liverpool v Fulham (3)

> Liverpool v West Ham (3)

> Burnley v Liverpool (0) Who loses at Burnley? (apart from ManU)

> Liverpool v Chelsea (1)

> Hull v Liverpool (0 )Can't win at Hull?

>

> Which by my calculations means they will finish on

> same points as Spurs and it will be decided on

> goal difference, which based on number of forecast

> wins and defeats should mean the Reds pip Spurs.

>

> EDITED to say I forgot Spurs last game of season

> away at Burnley, so that makes Spurs by a margin

> of 3 points!


I'd forget your calculations Matthew. I think they are all over the place.

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let us just agree then Narnia that Spurs will do

> their usual handbag performance when they play

> United


I'd be delighted though I seem to remember they were 2 up last season at OT before the ref intervened and brought MU back into it.

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted

Good to see there is still some honour in Football Management, as Zola considers his future overnight to whether it is he that is the problem for what is happening on the pitch down at West Ham.


"I need to find out what is the problem - and if the problem is me. I will have to think about that overnight. I don't think it's that the players are not trying. The bottom line is to see whether I can help them or not."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/8591141.stm

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A stiker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > Bentner but for months they had to play without

> a

> > striker.

>

> Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott. Ummm....are

> they not strikers then?

>


Jah


Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season without a goal scoring centre forward......"


Thats pretty much the point I was making.


As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and me know more than thee :)

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

> > -----

> > > A striker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > > Bentner but for months they had to play

> without

> > a

> > > striker.

> >

> > Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott.

> Ummm....are

> > they not strikers then?

> >

>

> Jah

>

> Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said

> "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season

> without a goal scoring centre forward......"

>

> Thats pretty much the point I was making.

>

> As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and

> me know more than thee :)



He said a centre forward. You said striker. There are different types of strikers are there not? If you'd said centre forward I'd have agreed with you but you didn't you said striker. Perhaps next time you'll be more specific.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Striker = Centre Forward to most people Jah?. You can have lots of forwards but the striker is the one that plays front and centre. Thats what Arsenal have had to play without.


But good to know you would have agreed with me had I used the right terminology.


More importantly Arsenal have played the whole season with a crap goalkeeper as further evidenced on Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Should Rachel Reeves consider a tax on overseas remittances?

      By jazzer · Posted

      So you'd like to see people double taxed on the money they earn first and then on any funds they transfer overseas, that's unfair and unjust. 
    • vladi
      Should Rachel Reeves consider a tax on overseas remittances?

      By vladi · Posted

      Don't think they are externalising these billions to thwart Reeves. They are doing it to build mansions in Lagos, Lahore, Hyderabad and the Caribbean . Plus set up businesses overseas , not the UK. Plus of course externalise the proceeds from crime. Twenty years ago, processors such as Western Union did not exist. Now they have outlets on every street. They externalise money without any controls. It's gotta change to protect the UK economy.
    • jazzer
      Should Rachel Reeves consider a tax on overseas remittances?

      By jazzer · Posted

      So stop all transferring of funds out of the UK. Have you had a thought as to why people may be doing this, they've had enough of thieving Reeves and want to protect their funds, hence moving it over sea's and out of the reach of Reeves. The 26th November will come around really quickly, then we'll become aware of what other actions Reeves is planning on taking to plunder all of us. The pot is only so deep and you can't get blood out of a stone. She'll actually create more austerity if she continues with her tax grabs. Rather than doing that, spend on essentials and not vanity projects. The employers NI hike has had a detrimental effect with employers reducing vacancies and shedding labour. Does she not see that business creates growth and not the Government directly. Her, Starmer, Streeting, Lammy and the rest of that motley crew need booting out of Government and be replaced by Badenoch and Stride who will stop the rot. Before Starmer and crew came into office inflation was down to 2%, since then month on month it's increased to somewhere around 3.8% and is expected, nay predicted, to reach in excess of 5% at the current rate. as a result employment will further increase and that has to be paid for through DWP. We are being gradually crippled by Reeves.   
    • ianr
      Should Rachel Reeves consider a tax on overseas remittances?

      By ianr · Posted

      Which think tank?  Why no link to what they have to say?

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...