Jump to content

Recommended Posts

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of Spurs remaining fixtures I only see them

> collecting 3 points against Bolton, and 1 at

> Sunderland.

>

> Sunderland v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Arsenal They can't win this?

> Tottenham v Chelsea They can't win this?

> Man Utd v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Bolton

> Man City v Tottenham They can draw this!

>

> For Liverpool what I have put in brackets

>

> Liverpool v Sunderland (3)

> Birmingham v Liverpool (1)

> Liverpool v Fulham (3)

> Liverpool v West Ham (3)

> Burnley v Liverpool (0) Who loses at Burnley? (apart from ManU)

> Liverpool v Chelsea (1)

> Hull v Liverpool (0 )Can't win at Hull?

>

> Which by my calculations means they will finish on

> same points as Spurs and it will be decided on

> goal difference, which based on number of forecast

> wins and defeats should mean the Reds pip Spurs.

>

> EDITED to say I forgot Spurs last game of season

> away at Burnley, so that makes Spurs by a margin

> of 3 points!


I'd forget your calculations Matthew. I think they are all over the place.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let us just agree then Narnia that Spurs will do

> their usual handbag performance when they play

> United


I'd be delighted though I seem to remember they were 2 up last season at OT before the ref intervened and brought MU back into it.

Good to see there is still some honour in Football Management, as Zola considers his future overnight to whether it is he that is the problem for what is happening on the pitch down at West Ham.


"I need to find out what is the problem - and if the problem is me. I will have to think about that overnight. I don't think it's that the players are not trying. The bottom line is to see whether I can help them or not."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/8591141.stm

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A stiker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > Bentner but for months they had to play without

> a

> > striker.

>

> Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott. Ummm....are

> they not strikers then?

>


Jah


Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season without a goal scoring centre forward......"


Thats pretty much the point I was making.


As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and me know more than thee :)

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

> > -----

> > > A striker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > > Bentner but for months they had to play

> without

> > a

> > > striker.

> >

> > Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott.

> Ummm....are

> > they not strikers then?

> >

>

> Jah

>

> Just watching MOTD and Gary Linekar just said

> "Arsenal have played virtually the whole season

> without a goal scoring centre forward......"

>

> Thats pretty much the point I was making.

>

> As he is a Spurs hero - you have to accept he and

> me know more than thee :)



He said a centre forward. You said striker. There are different types of strikers are there not? If you'd said centre forward I'd have agreed with you but you didn't you said striker. Perhaps next time you'll be more specific.

Striker = Centre Forward to most people Jah?. You can have lots of forwards but the striker is the one that plays front and centre. Thats what Arsenal have had to play without.


But good to know you would have agreed with me had I used the right terminology.


More importantly Arsenal have played the whole season with a crap goalkeeper as further evidenced on Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What is the reason for the change in name? Just curious.
    • Why change it?  You’ve got a fantastic historic, memorable name and you want to change it for something innocuous.
    • From the school newsletter:   A New Name for Dog Kennel Hill As you know we have been discussing and consulting with stakeholders about a  name change at DKH for a while. Following engagement with staff, pupils and  families, we gathered all views on a name change for the school and after  careful consideration of the feedback, the Local Committee and the Trust have  agreed with changing the school name to Grove Primary School from  September 2025.  Over the next few months we will begin a gradual process of changing our  name on signage, our website and emails etc. We will keep you updated.  We will be looking at designing a new logo to match the new school name and  will be working closely with a graphic designer to get creative. The school  council will be actively involved in this process. We will share the results with  you as soon as a design has been agreed and confirmed. We will be creating a  new school jumper to replace the old one, once the logo has been finalised. We  will phase this in over time.  We know that this is a welcoming change for some and that there are  parents and children who will be sad about the change. However, as a school  we think it will be a positive change for our school community and we will  work together to ensure that the ethos and culture of DKH will remain!
    • if I think of Corbyn dealing with a global pandemic (a lot of his supporters and some of his family come from the woo end of the spectrum - his brother is a proper anti-vax nut), then the  invasion of Ukraine (Corbyn long record of not exactly condemning Putin even as he killed people on British soil and many other matters, I  really do shudder    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...