Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The Scot's [Dalgliesh] daughter Kelly Cates, a former presenter on Sky Sports News, joked on her Twitter account: "Phew, am exhausted. Just read about something called 'the offside rule'. Too much for my tiny brain. Must be damaged from nail polish fumes."


That made me laugh! All a bit ridiculous in my opinion - all jokes are stereotypes, I think it's gone way over the top.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The Scot's daughter Kelly Cates, a former

> presenter on Sky Sports News, joked on her Twitter

> account: "Phew, am exhausted. Just read about

> something called 'the offside rule'. Too much for

> my tiny brain. Must be damaged from nail polish

> fumes."

>

> That made me laugh! All a bit ridiculous in my

> opinion - all jokes are stereotypes, I think it's

> gone way over the top.


"Dalglish" ;)


Kenny had a little dig at the sky reporter in yesterday's press conference about it too. LOVE HIM!


I don't think they were joking, but I do think it was out of order. I don't that Gray deserves to be sacked for it.

Is it me or did Blackpool miss out on a nailed on penalty when they were 2 nil up? Who says the refs make decsions in favour of clubs? Well Ian HoLLoway for one. Would have bee interesting to see how things would have turned out if the pena had been given and converted.


Anyway, 3 nil to the Arsenal, 3 goals scored in each of the past 4 games. I'm happy with that.

Well, to counter the "same old shit", I would just like to SHOUT!


Yesterday:


Dulwich Hamlets v Romford (cup tie): 2 - 1 to DH


Man U v Blackpool: 3 - 2 to Man. U.


I watched both of those matches simultaneously last night (DH at home and Man. U in the DH bar!). Both my teams won.


Am I a happy bunny? Do bears crap in the woods? Same old shit?:))

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW, wasn't Sir Alex's face following Man. U's 3rd

> goal simply a joy to behold! Happiness in its

> purest form.



Fergusons face, at any time, cannot be described as a "joy to behold" nor can Wengers, unless you have a perverted sense of beauty.

The biggest mystery of yesterdya evening was why Mark Halsey stopped play after the ball came off of him in the second half and Arsenal looked likely to score. Doesn?t he know the rules? Give me Sian Massey (she of the Andy Gray/Richard Keys incident) any day. Hell, even Charlotte Jackson would probably have a better grasp of the laws of association football than Halsey demonstrated in that incident.

> Fergusons face, at any time, cannot be described

> as a "joy to behold" nor can Wengers, unless you

> have a perverted sense of beauty.


OK, I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that. Not a good picture, but come on...just look at that child-like joy upon the man's face! (You need to scroll to very near the end).


As for Wengers, I didn't see the match with Ipswich, but I'd be very surprised if, he too, didn't return home with a big fat grin on his face.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...