Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think Rogers is a good choice for Liverpool even if it comes with a bit of risk. He should be able to do what any good coach can, that is get get more out of the players and the team. If Liverpool had gone for a big name you can be sure they would have wanted guarantees of money to spend and am not sure Liverpool have that luxury. Not sure if Carroll will fit into the Rogers way though, a decent Euros and maybe he will be sold to fund other purchases.

I think the fans will get behind him. With Hodgson they all wanted the return of King Kenny - well they've had that now so - apart from thereturnofRafa.org - there's nowhere else to go.


A lot depends, though, on what KK will do now - and how much (if at all?) he interferes/comments from the sidelines.

Chuffed that Rogers has signed up, and I think the match going faithful will get behind him. Poor old Roy was seen as Hicks & Gillett's man, and that was never going to work, but to be fair to them, they did greet him warmly. They never gave him much chance when results were bad though.


I think all Liverpool fans realise that there is a lot of work to be done to build a new team with a good style of play.


I for one hope Rogers can build Liverlona!

Also, Joe Cole and Alberto Aquilani, both of whom I actually like, may find a way back under Rogers, and apparently even Kuyt was thinking of leaving after limited chances last season, so hopefully he'll rethink.


Exciting times, and expectations not too high for once... Although that won't last.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Joe Cole will be back with the Irons next year :)



Yeah - hoping Rodgers doesn't want Cole back but think he will - played really well for Lille with their fans giving him the 'Hey Jude' chant so he's hot again - which makes the chances of a prodigal's return slim (crosses digits and things) - don't understand why he hasn't been called up by Hodgson...

I haven't been a fan of the Euro's over the years, and this year is no exception, but what the fcuk is going on with the FA, and Hodgson, and what are the footballing reasons he refers to for Ferdinands exclusion. Wouldn't be better for all concerned if he just came out and said what these "reasons" are?

Former Captain Richard Gough comments on Rangers liquidation:


Sympathy is thin on the ground amongst the Rangers support for those who ?chased the dream? with Gough blunt and to the point with his anger.


?Lock them up and throw the key away,? he told The Sun. ?The club I gave blood, sweat and tears for is dead. Whose fault is it? I don?t care.


?All I care about is the people who brought Rangers to their knees are punished. Tax evasion is a crime, everyone knows that. If you don?t pay your taxes you go to jail.


?It?s a white-collar crime that must have consequences so if HMRC are really serious about liquidation giving them the best chance to investigate why Rangers failed, I want to see it done properly.


?I want to see the people who are responsible for running Rangers into the ground brought to book. I don?t know if it?s Craig Whyte or whoever but I do know the culprit ? or culprits ? should be locked up.?


Gough added: ?I?m still numb by the news 140 years of history has been wiped out in one fell swoop. It?s like a death in the family you know has been coming for a while.


?When it happens it still knocks you for six. It?s difficult to know what to make of it all. Too big to fail, that?s what I always thought. Or maybe it was more to do with not believing a club could be so badly mismanaged.


?This whole sorry episode has been one rat?s nest of corruption. So much of it stinks. It would take someone a long time to start piecing together all the rotten bits of this jigsaw but time might be something HMRC have if they are so determined to clamp down on tax evasion in football.


?When that happens I hope they show no mercy to the people who have destroyed Rangers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...