Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I always think a 1-0 win at home in europe is an excellent result. The home team have prevented their opponents scoring the crucial away goal and go into the next leg knowing that they could probably win the tie if they just score one away goal themselves.Also psychologically the home team won't throw everything at their opponents in second leg because winning margin is so narrow. Whereas if a team loses by 2 or 3 goals away in first leg it can really focus their minds and inspire a heroic performance in return leg to overcome deficit.

I have to admit i didn't know them by heart, had to look it up. Lyrics not my thing, I barely manage to remember "bubbles". Having seen Norwich a good dozen time's with my Naaaadge mate, I'd struggle to reproduce more than 'On the ball city....' frm memory.


It would be quite something to behold though!!!

Saturday


Birmingham 1 Everton 1

Bolton 1 Wigan Athletic 1

Burnley 2 Wolves 0

Chelsea 4 West Ham 0 ( 10th is still possible )

Hull City 1 Arsenal 0 always lose after champs league

Stoke City 2 Aston Villa 2

Tottenham 4 Blackburn 3


Sunday


Man Utd 3 Fulham 0

Sunderland 0 Man City 2


Monday


Liverpool 6 Portsmouth 0

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...