Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The Scot's [Dalgliesh] daughter Kelly Cates, a former presenter on Sky Sports News, joked on her Twitter account: "Phew, am exhausted. Just read about something called 'the offside rule'. Too much for my tiny brain. Must be damaged from nail polish fumes."


That made me laugh! All a bit ridiculous in my opinion - all jokes are stereotypes, I think it's gone way over the top.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The Scot's daughter Kelly Cates, a former

> presenter on Sky Sports News, joked on her Twitter

> account: "Phew, am exhausted. Just read about

> something called 'the offside rule'. Too much for

> my tiny brain. Must be damaged from nail polish

> fumes."

>

> That made me laugh! All a bit ridiculous in my

> opinion - all jokes are stereotypes, I think it's

> gone way over the top.


"Dalglish" ;)


Kenny had a little dig at the sky reporter in yesterday's press conference about it too. LOVE HIM!


I don't think they were joking, but I do think it was out of order. I don't that Gray deserves to be sacked for it.

Is it me or did Blackpool miss out on a nailed on penalty when they were 2 nil up? Who says the refs make decsions in favour of clubs? Well Ian HoLLoway for one. Would have bee interesting to see how things would have turned out if the pena had been given and converted.


Anyway, 3 nil to the Arsenal, 3 goals scored in each of the past 4 games. I'm happy with that.

Well, to counter the "same old shit", I would just like to SHOUT!


Yesterday:


Dulwich Hamlets v Romford (cup tie): 2 - 1 to DH


Man U v Blackpool: 3 - 2 to Man. U.


I watched both of those matches simultaneously last night (DH at home and Man. U in the DH bar!). Both my teams won.


Am I a happy bunny? Do bears crap in the woods? Same old shit?:))

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW, wasn't Sir Alex's face following Man. U's 3rd

> goal simply a joy to behold! Happiness in its

> purest form.



Fergusons face, at any time, cannot be described as a "joy to behold" nor can Wengers, unless you have a perverted sense of beauty.

The biggest mystery of yesterdya evening was why Mark Halsey stopped play after the ball came off of him in the second half and Arsenal looked likely to score. Doesn?t he know the rules? Give me Sian Massey (she of the Andy Gray/Richard Keys incident) any day. Hell, even Charlotte Jackson would probably have a better grasp of the laws of association football than Halsey demonstrated in that incident.

> Fergusons face, at any time, cannot be described

> as a "joy to behold" nor can Wengers, unless you

> have a perverted sense of beauty.


OK, I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that. Not a good picture, but come on...just look at that child-like joy upon the man's face! (You need to scroll to very near the end).


As for Wengers, I didn't see the match with Ipswich, but I'd be very surprised if, he too, didn't return home with a big fat grin on his face.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...