Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mourinho, Ancelotti, Hiddink, O'Neil. There's four names for you Anna. I'm not sure you'd have got Jose but I bet you could have made a good fist of getting the others and they would all be suitable replacements. I don't believe a club with your history couldn't attract a manager to replace Rafa.

And we could afford all of them given they all have existing contracts?! Rafa is going nowhere and neither do I want him to. None of that lot would come here given the financial restrictions. Maybe O'Neill would come, but he's a yes man and I would never want him here. I think Rafa has stayed due to his loyalty to the fans. Anyone else would have walked by now.


Mick, i'm still waiting for your tactical football manager genius on what you'd have done differently last night?

It just makes me laugh Anna that you seem to think that people who can afford to go to all the matches, somehow have more right to an opinion than people who can't. Until last season, you watched a lot of matches from your sofa, did your opinions not count back then? Last thing I want to do is have a go at you, but you're always posting shit like that, and it's annoying.

My point is Keef, that people who go to the games tend to know more about what is going on rather than taking their facts from sky pundits and the press. You mix with the locals and matchgoers and you tend to get inside info. Everyone I know who goes, wants Rafa to stay yet those who watch it on the telly want him out. What does that tell you? Nothing to do with money or being a better fan. It really pisses me off when I put my heart and soul in to this team and people who don't seem to grasp "the facts" are hounding Rafa out.

And I do take it as you having a go so offence is taken. You chose to spend your money on your family, I spend mine on the match. Everyone has a choice.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Mick, quit the Rafa bashing -its tiresome!

> Tell me what you would have done differently oh

> mighty one? Because I don't think he could have

> done much more last night. And while you're at it,

> tell who you'd replace Rafa with.

>

> People were ringing 606 from the comfort of their

> armchairs to slate the manager when they can't

> even be bothered to get to off their arses and

> actually support the team? Well I never - that's

> never happened before.

>

> P.S - it was pen from where I was sat, but given

> it was at the other end of the pitch and I was in

> the gods of the Kop its not fair I make a

> judgement. If he did dive then its a shame and I

> don't want that at Liverpool and won't defend it.

>

>

> We deserve some luck though. I can think of at

> least two situations where we had a penalty shout

> this season and got nothing. Its just a shame

> Birmingham were on the receiving end. Mind you if

> you park the team bus in front of goal then you

> only deserve a draw.


Nailed on penalty for me, luck is one thing, but this wasn't lucky.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Maybe O'Neill would come, but he's a yes man and I

> would never want him here.


Thats news to me Anna - Martin O'Neill a yes man - you are having a laugh.



> Mick, i'm still waiting for your tactical football

> manager genius on what you'd have done differently

> last night?


Look at the EDF Super Liga FF table and see evidence my management genius - I have brought a poor team from bottom to 6th - so I think you have to accept I know what I am talking about when it comes to management. I'm on your tail.

Well if you've taken offence then I'm sorry, but I still don't think that terrace chat is "fact". Simple fact is, the owners are liverpool's biggest problem, but they are hard nosed businessmen, who definitely aren't going anywhere because the fans tell them to. So, if we just accept that they own the club for now, and the foreseeable future, will Rafa take the club further, or is he as far as he can go, until a mega rich owner comes along? Personally, I don't base my opinions on what anyone says, I just watch the match, or the highlights, and decide for myself. I don't want Rafa out, and don't think there is anyone to replace him just now. However, I don't think he's the best manager in the world.

Do you actually have to touch someone for it to be a foul? If the Liv player hadn't jumped, Carsley would certainly have made contact with him, no? The fact he didn't touch him was because the player hurdled the tackle. The tackler definitely didn't get any ball, did he?


Ngog could have left his foot dragging, like experienced penalty winners do, and drawn the penalty that way. Or he could have made a massive effort to stay on his feet, probably losing the ball as a result of Carsely's slide (that never won the ball).

No you don't have to touch a player - but I think for it to be given as a foul it has to be seen as a foul would have taken place if the opponent had not taken measures to avoid contact. In the case of Ngog it wasn't remotely anywhere near being a foul. The weird thing about Ngog's dive was he was always in control of the ball and if he hadn't decided to go down it looked like a simple pull back for Yossi to equalize on edge of 6 yard box. Liverpool were pushing very hard at this point in the game and the momentum was such that I felt an equalizer was inevitable. But as Anna said we've been denied a lot more cast iron penalties this season than ones awarded for cheating.
Apparently a foul can be given for "intent" but how do you prove "intent"? I still think it was a blatant dive and I'm not convinced that the was hurdling the challenge, if so why didn't he just leave his foot in to eliminate all doubt? Sorry blatant dive for me.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you actually have to touch someone for it to be

> a foul?

>

> Does anyone know the answer to this?


Contact is not necessary Ted - "kicks or attempts to kick"/"trips or attempts to trip" is an offence - if there is no contact its seems to rest on intent.


Laws - see page 32

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "You chose to spend your money on your family, I

> spend mine on the match. Everyone has a choice."

>

> That seems like a sensible perspective. Keef,

> stop wasting your money on that kid and start a

> standing order to the Rafa Transfer Fund.



Interpret that how you like. Keef chose to get married and have children. I chose not to therefore, I can spend my earnings on what I like, i.e. going to the football.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...