Jump to content

Recommended Posts

dds29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hello James,

> I walked past the Papa John's trailer again

> today; they've manoeuvred it into an even more

> prominent position, (if that's possible) any news

> from the council? and can we add complaints, and

> to whom?Get a life the lot of you

> dds

I spoke to the guy at Papa Johns who said it is meant to be towed around as an advert but their 4x4 is broken. He said it will be gone by the end of Jan. It's good to up the prominence of the parade for us (BC Bikes) but when it obscures the shop it get's annoying.

Today I received an email from the lead officer.

Papa Johns havebeen told Southwark legal dept are asking up their case after the warning letter was ignored and that fine is likely to be ?1,000 + ?40 for every day.


I'm sure others will decide that supporting any business that clearly disregards the law and the local environment doesn't warrant their support.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Council officers have confirmed this advertisement

> would need advertising consent and none has been

> applied for and it will be investigated.


--------------------------------------------------------


Hello all. Just had to take issue here as I am aware of this said 'eyesore'. Slightly harsh words given rye lane is only round the corner, I wonder how many shopfronts there have full Ad Consent. That aside, there is a slight aroma of hypocrisy given that I get unsolicited advertisements from the lib dems through my letter box on a fairly regular basis Mr Barber... I guess you don't need permission to push your politics into my front room. Might is suggest all fly posters seek my permission in future before they become an unwarranted eyesore in my home.


Sorry if I missed something.

I was delighted to see this advertising trailer - if it hadn't been there I might not have seen the great deal they were doing on large or extra large pizzas! The only downside is, I have put on several pounds since Papa Johns opened up close by! I intend to keep supporting them though - I'll just have to cut back on my other food...

> Hello all. Just had to take issue here as I am

> aware of this said 'eyesore'. Slightly harsh words

> given rye lane is only round the corner, I wonder

> how many shopfronts there have full Ad Consent.

> That aside, there is a slight aroma of hypocrisy

> given that I get unsolicited advertisements from

> the lib dems through my letter box on a fairly

> regular basis Mr Barber... I guess you don't need

> permission to push your politics into my front

> room. Might is suggest all fly posters seek my

> permission in future before they become an

> unwarranted eyesore in my home.

>

> Sorry if I missed something.


(tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...