Jump to content

Recommended Posts

dds29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hello James,

> I walked past the Papa John's trailer again

> today; they've manoeuvred it into an even more

> prominent position, (if that's possible) any news

> from the council? and can we add complaints, and

> to whom?Get a life the lot of you

> dds

I spoke to the guy at Papa Johns who said it is meant to be towed around as an advert but their 4x4 is broken. He said it will be gone by the end of Jan. It's good to up the prominence of the parade for us (BC Bikes) but when it obscures the shop it get's annoying.

Today I received an email from the lead officer.

Papa Johns havebeen told Southwark legal dept are asking up their case after the warning letter was ignored and that fine is likely to be ?1,000 + ?40 for every day.


I'm sure others will decide that supporting any business that clearly disregards the law and the local environment doesn't warrant their support.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Council officers have confirmed this advertisement

> would need advertising consent and none has been

> applied for and it will be investigated.


--------------------------------------------------------


Hello all. Just had to take issue here as I am aware of this said 'eyesore'. Slightly harsh words given rye lane is only round the corner, I wonder how many shopfronts there have full Ad Consent. That aside, there is a slight aroma of hypocrisy given that I get unsolicited advertisements from the lib dems through my letter box on a fairly regular basis Mr Barber... I guess you don't need permission to push your politics into my front room. Might is suggest all fly posters seek my permission in future before they become an unwarranted eyesore in my home.


Sorry if I missed something.

I was delighted to see this advertising trailer - if it hadn't been there I might not have seen the great deal they were doing on large or extra large pizzas! The only downside is, I have put on several pounds since Papa Johns opened up close by! I intend to keep supporting them though - I'll just have to cut back on my other food...

> Hello all. Just had to take issue here as I am

> aware of this said 'eyesore'. Slightly harsh words

> given rye lane is only round the corner, I wonder

> how many shopfronts there have full Ad Consent.

> That aside, there is a slight aroma of hypocrisy

> given that I get unsolicited advertisements from

> the lib dems through my letter box on a fairly

> regular basis Mr Barber... I guess you don't need

> permission to push your politics into my front

> room. Might is suggest all fly posters seek my

> permission in future before they become an

> unwarranted eyesore in my home.

>

> Sorry if I missed something.


(tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...