Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That was a pretty good entrance - and Maurice has since become an essential Edfer.


What about the thread about the scratched Porsche! certainly caused a lot of heat. One guy took real exception and threw all his toys out the pram and promised not to come back and the other threw a hissy fit before warming to the banter and sort of climbing on board. (I'm deliberately not searching that thread to see if I remember things correctly)

I loved the limericks. 42 pages and counting...including these gems:


There was a new shop named Moxton

that moved to East Dulwich from Hoxton

Their slippery eels..

Resembled baby seals

But was soon bought out by Foxton


When Dulwichmum had a book launch

she had to work hard on her paunch

So she stopped eating cake

For cake eating sake

And stuck with the creamy blancmange



Maurice wants to know about crack

He's hoping that in Santa's sack

There'll be uppers and downers

and a few Golden Browners

A spliff a few Es and some smack

And how about that EDF Scrabble Game somebody spotted in November?




I N D E P E N D A N T

.......E....................E

C A F E N E R O.....I

.......I...........A........G

.......N...........Y........H

.......A...........L........B

.......T........M O X T O N S

.......E...........N........R

..............................H

..............................O

..............................O

..............................D

Anytime you want to join in and up the standards JC, feel free.




JesusCappuccino Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mightyroar Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Maurice wants to know about crack

> > He's hoping that in Santa's sack

> > There'll be uppers and downers

> > and a few Golden Browners

> > A spliff a few Es and some smack

>

> The fact that this came out of all those pages and

> pages of awful limericks makes me believe that

> thing about monkeys, typewriters and Shakespeare.

JesusCappuccino Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The fact that this came out of all those pages and

> pages of awful limericks makes me believe that

> thing about monkeys, typewriters and Shakespeare.


They have never proved anything about Shakespeare and the monkey.

Some forum facts for this year, well, up until 12th December:


74,593 people visited this site


There were 5,290,586 Page Views


There are now 2,646 registered users


Of those 1,918 have posted at least once


Keef's posted 3,928 times


The most viewed thread: Famous Faces (viewed more than 8,000 times)


The busiest forum day of the year was Wednesday December 5th with 1,411 unique visitors


The weekday average last week was 1,298 unique visitors a day

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just for Brendan:

>

> Russell Grig calculates that if a monkey types one

> key at random, per second, the average time to

> produce the word 'the' is 34.72 hours. To produce

> the 23rd Psalm would take on average around 1017 years.


Well the Psalms are attributed to David and Saul but not being familiar with their specific cases I cannot comment on how much time they had on their hands or indeed how many monkeys they had in their employment. Although I believe David left Saul a few wives as inheritance. They lived in what is predominantly citrus country anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...