Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Coen Brothers film. Just watched it. A great boys film. Dead drug dealers, a hero who finds the loot, lots of very tense action and chases, loads of blood and killing and it's pretty gruesome. Very Coen Brothers - See Blood Simple and Fargo, add them together with a bit of Desperado and you have a winner!

http://vjmorton.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/no-country-for-old-men.jpg


Very cool. Not totally excellent. But great.


Charlie

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2328-no-country-for-old-men/
Share on other sites

why do you assume it is 'a boys [sic] film'? That is rather stereotypically mysoginistically chauvinist of you. I suppose girls just like soppy films about boyfriends?

I happened to read a review of this the other day and thought 'that sounds good must see it' not ' oh gosh gruesome violence must steer clear'.

Die Hard 3? People don't seem to like that one so much but I like it a lot - watched it again just recently in fact


But I wouldn't classify Die Hard as a blokes film and Love Actually as a girls film - I know plenty of both sexes who would choose the other

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Boys film / girls film.

> Action, adventure, war, violence / rom com,

> costume drama, tragedy, soppy love stories.

>

> Boys sometimes like girly films and girls

> sometimes like boyish films.

>

> I didn't assume it was a boys film. It is a boys

> film.


Total and utter drivel - most films are either good or bad, well made, interesting, well acted or are not. People's tastes are less affected by sexuality than you'd think.


What 'sex' film would 'I am Legend' be or 'Downfall' or 'Sideways' or 'Tell No-One' ?

Er, excuse me but I am female and I thought Love Actually and for that matter, Notting Hill were both big piles of utter crap.

Charlie, I don't agree with your assertion. I understand where you are coming from but it just reinforces baseless assupmtions.


EDIT: what Cassius said (to use a Keefism)

If you're in the business of making films then (generally speaking) you want to maximise distribution and hence profit. With that in mind the film is normally aimed at a specific group of people. Gay films, childrens films, chick flicks etc. Doesn't mean people or genders can't cross over. Same applies to music, books etc. I don't think Char1ie was trying to be sexist but I suspect he's from the meeja world and simply used some jargon.
I would think that maximising distribution would mean not minimising target audience by labelling them as above. However when I accused Charlie of being an whatever it was I said, I was being slightly tongue in cheek. BUT saying things like that is an example of the invidious/insidious (not sure which) reinforcing of stereotypes.
Totall agree Sean, I was talking post inception. Most writers/creators just want to tell a good story or simply entertain. It's once it gets sucked up by the likes of Sony, BMG, TimeWarner etc that it becomes a different animal. That's why independent stuff is generally so much more appealing because it's become less corrupted on its journey from creation to delivery.

I'm not reinforcing stereotypes. And there's nothing wrong with stereotypes anyway, it's how we catagorise the world.


You have heard the following phrases, and I think their meanings are all pretty clear:


Chick lit = Books aimed primarily at females

Family drama = Drama aimed at families

Adult entertainment = entertainment for adult.


These identify the primary audience that the work is aimed at. Each term is not exclusive. ie Family drama does not mean that you may not watch it if you are not a member of a family.


Lighten up.


Bridget Jones is a girls film. This film is a boys film. It doesn't exlude girls, or lesbians, or midgets, or the aged, or Spanish people. It jusy happens to be primarily aimed at men.


Stop being so bloody East Dulwich.


**All said with a smile btw**



Charlie

But NO-ONE likes being stereotyped - it might be one way (a lazy one) to catagorise the world but that doesn't mean it's right.

Some stereotypes have been responsible for discrimination until the recent past and probably still is (thinking of the straight woman sacked from a 'gay' nightclub and being called a 'breeder' - well she may well wish to have children and therefore that may well be a stereotyped view of her, but she was awarded several thousand pounds for it)


It's not a matter of lightening up or being 'bloody East Dulwich' (what's that meant to mean?) but a desire to move away this kind of stereotyping.

I agree with your sentiment Cassius, but unfortunately I'm not sure NO-ONE likes being stereotyped. And even more people actually like stereotyping other people


It's lazy thinking if you ask me but it's fairly widespread. I hate it myself and on a good day with the wind behind me, could actually lay most of the evils of the world at it's door...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...