Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My bank just contacted me to say someone's tried to withdraw money in Egypt in the last few days using my Switch card but because they didn't know my PIN it didn't work. I like to think I'd recognise a cash machine that's been tampered with or I'd notice if someone tried to swipe it (I've watched The Real Hustle you know), but I obviously didn't. Fortunately I do cover my hand when I'm typing in the PIN which is why they didn't get away with it. Sorry, not a very interesting post but I just thought I'd share that with you.


En guard.

I once had a 500 quid bar bill put on my credit card at a bulgarian ski resort, my never having been skiing or in bulgaria.

It took 6 months to get it back from the bank the rotters, and I'd never used it in any machine of any sort, which leaves some clever internet scam, or dumb banks. As it only happened once I'm going with the latter.

Someone applied for a mortgage and ran up an enormous credit card bill in Holland in our names last year! It completely freaked us out. Apparently as our house was on the market at the time, the police warned us that there was a possibility somebody was viewing houses and picking up old credit cards slips or statements or forms of ID from houses in SE21 at the time. We have bought ourselves a shredder since. Apparently this happened in a number of local homes on the market at the time.

Last week NatWest contacted me to say someone was trying to use a card in my name in a machine in Malaysia, unsuccessfully fortunately. Again, it must have been cloning, but I've no idea where it was done.


When I got back from holiday last year I got a similar call - that time I'm pretty sure the culprits used a "malfunctioning" cash machine in a German Autobahn service station.


Ruth

Gosh;this is happening a lot! Someone managed to clone mine and bought ?2000 worth of gold jewellery and electronic goods in Bangalore of all places. I reckon ?2000 must go a pretty long way in Bangalore, so thats a lot of jewellery. I nearly had a heart attack when I found out! Mastercard dealt with it very well though.


spymum


(Blog: Posh Mum)

Someone tried to use my Visa in Egypt just the other day too! I hadn't used it in any cash machines for a long time, so that rules out ATM tampering, at least for me. Mark - can you send me a private message with what shops and restaurants you have used recently in the ED area, maybe we can put out heads together?

wont be an ATM - its is likely a rogue shopkeeper - petrol stations are pretty bad for it, due to hight turnover of cards. - they use an altered chip n pin machine to take all the card detail and a copy of your PIN at the same time, then transfer it onto a blank card for use.you process as normal and bcant tell the machine is messed with.card info is sold off witnionga few hours and cloned cards used all over the world.very few of the overseas sale/ shops involved are entirely innocent and usually party to the scam- eg the ?2K in bangalore in all likelyhood.


Certain shops in Peckham Rye lane are used by bottom rung cloners with oddly surprising regularity - coincidence ? they "sell" phantom goods to the cloner, debit the catrd andf give the cloner half the sale in cash.


The banks are not publicising this at the minute,as they marketed the chp n pin as the ultimate deterrant - but crims busted the system within about a month - the lebanese loop used at ATMS is crude by comparison & useed by bottom rung cruims nowadays.

Chip and pin is the worst thing that's been done to joe public by the banking industry for a long time. For starters it puts the onus of detecting fraud on the consumer, not the banker, and are you aware that for 40 minutes after using a chip'n'pin the store is legitimately able to take more money from your account. If you disagree you won't have a clue 'til your statement arrives.


That means if you withhold service from, oooh say the Palmerston*, because it's rubbish, they'll take your cash, and once you're out the door they'll add 20% just for good measure, and they'll be within their rights to do this.


Travesty I say.

more details here

http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2006/11/chippin-away-at-fraud.html


*I should point out that although the Palmerston's sins are many, they've never done this.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trev - again, if you want to compare notes on

> local transactions, I'd be happy to. I think it

> can only really be 4-5 places.



this could be interesting should the same type of business crop up.....................

Mockney, I love you dearly, but your junk website isn't accurate - there has been no change in the banking code since before chip'n'pin. The onus has always been on the customer to detect and defend against fraud, and the onus has always been on the banks to assume innocence unless they can prove that fraudulent transactions are the responsibility of the card owner.


It doesn't always work this way as it's not law; by and large the banks review your transaction history to establish motive as a measure of innocence: outrageous but staggeringly effective. It's surprsing how many granny's cards get 'stolen' immediately after chav daughter hits her overdraft limit! There is an ombudsman to defend one's position.


As for this guff about access to details and PINs, nonsense. Retailers retain the right to amend existing orders but have no access to PINs, if they abuse this they go to jail. The same law applies to Direct Debits, which isn't new, and is very useful.


Most users (as per this website) get their cash refunded. I've been victim of 3,600 GBP card fraud in me time, as it's not possible to travel between Norwich and Southend in 3 mins and 27 secs.


You should work harder to establish foundations for your anarchist theories! ;-)

banks have mooted making customers responsible for frauds on their cards, but when realisation came that people may respond by reverting to a cash economy once again, the banks would lose a staggering amount in transaction fees/ interest on cards etc .... and any move by the banks would have to be across the board for all high street banks, otherwise people would just switch to a different bank that doeas offer fraud cover....and then we get into cartels and suchlike should the banks collude to collectively refute all fraud claims.....
Slightly off topic, but has anyone tried claiming back their bank charges? I'm halfway through the process, and will definitely post the results on here, if anyone has been badly stung for charges now is the time to try and claim back, as you can be sure the banks will be working night and day to close the loop holes!

No loopholes on this one Keef! Banks are allowed to charge you for expenses but not punishment - the reason they're currently refunding is that they don't want to expose this debate in court.


You shouldn't assume full repayment - just 80% for the last six year's worth. The process should last no longer than 28 days. Give them a 14 day limit on the first letter, and after fourteen days commit to legal action after fourteen more...

Hy there

This has happened to four of my collegues in the last 3 days and there is one common link.After they used their card in a certain place money was withdrawn in eygpt,all but 1 collegue have had their money refunded.After chatting to my collegues it transpired they all used a place where they sell petrol.Hsbc bank have asked all my collegues if they have used a petrol station in ED.

Guys,


I used *fuel supplier's name removed* in ED on 13/02. Saying that I have also used it up and down Lordship Lane over the last month. Oh, and 6 times in Egypt yesterday, although that must have been a boozy enough trip as I have no recollection whatsoever.


So what happens next, do we storm the *fuel supplier's name removed* garage and take the employees as hostage til we get our cash back?


p.s. only joking.


Trev.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...