Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Playing the ever popular "song game" & seeing all those tunes got me thinking.

How about an album of original songs [side A] along with a covered version that was a bigger hit than the original!! [side B]

(That'll get the brain tickin')


Something like: Tainted Love ? Gloria Jones covered by Soft Cell


What pair of songs would you include in your album?


My choice would be:

It must be love - Labi Siffre covered by Madness

Cole Porters, Love has come around sung by Billie Holiday - Donald Byrd and the 125th St NYC

You Send Me, Sam Cooke - Roy Ayres

The Message, Cymande - Aswad

Adagio for strings, Samuel Barber - William Orbit (Ferry Corsten Remix)

What you won't do for love, Bobby Caldwell - Goldie

Nights over Egypt, Jeane Carne - Incognito


I think these would have to be double A's

Obviously loads of old blues and reggae records, some soul too. But were they any better than the originals? Mostly I'd say no.


Red Red Wine written by Neil Diamond and a huge hit for UB40 springs to mind and Andy Williams Can't Get Used To Losing You (written by Bacharach & David) and later a hit for The Beat is another.

Rod Stewart covered quite a few Bob Dylan tracks early on his solo career (when he was good) and is one of the few people who actually improved on the originals.


Only A Hobo, Girl From The North Country, Mama You've Been On My Mind, North Country Girl, to name a few.

Handbags & Gladrags. The Stereophonics version was big, everyone says Rod Stewart's version was better (to me they sound much the same), what most people forget is that the first person to record it was Chris Farlowe.


Hallelujah by Leonard Cohen... Many different versions, Jeff Buckley's being the most famous.


Don't know about bigger hit, but one of my favourite covers was Guns N'Roses' version of the Wings' "Live and let die".

Just thought of the ultimate cover that was a much much much bigger hit.


Before being a big hit worldwide, Natalie Imbruglia's Torn was written and released first by a band called Ednaswap, before being covered by some Norwegian woman called Trine Rein.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Handbags & Gladrags. The Stereophonics version was

> big, everyone says Rod Stewart's version was

> better (to me they sound much the same), what most

> people forget is that the first person to record

> it was Chris Farlowe.

>

The strange thing about this tune is that Mike D'Abo , on time lead singer of Manfred Mann, wrote this masterpiece but never recorded his own version. I would love to have heard his take on it. Although he did play the piano on the Rod version.

> The strange thing about this tune is that Mike D'Abo , on time lead singer of Manfred Mann, wrote this masterpiece but never recorded his own version. I would love to have heard his take on it. Although he did play the piano on the Rod version.


Final track of D'Abo album released in 1969.

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > The strange thing about this tune is that Mike

> D'Abo , on time lead singer of Manfred Mann, wrote

> this masterpiece but never recorded his own

> version. I would love to have heard his take on

> it. Although he did play the piano on the Rod

> version.

>

> Final track of D'Abo album released in 1969.


Well I'm blowed, I never knew that. Thanks for that, I'll have to get myself a copy. Thanks again, looking for it can go on my list of things to do at the weekend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...