Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think Sainsbury's are (1) reducing stocking levels and (2) ordering less fresh produce so that it's mainly all sold. So going to the store late/ after work means that fresh items (and others) are often not in stock. This is clearly economically sensible, if annoying, to late shoppers. Reducing waste of fresh produce is probably a good thing. Turning inventory over quickly (so less on shelves/ in stock rooms at then end of the trading day) makes good economic sense.


They clearly haven't yet got the balance right.


I haven't found the check-out etc. staff quite so glum as others, but obviously their numbers are falling as Sainsbury's tries to get us to do their jobs, unpaid.

What I don?t understand is why plain paper bags for fruit and veg like we had until the 1970s (?) can?t be reintroduced. These can be easily recycled or am I missing something?


Brown paper bags have the problem of opacity - what's in them and what's been scanned as in them may not align. And check-out people don't want to have to open up each bag to check either. Brown paper bags were what sellers (and some still do) put items in, they know what they are.

There?s a lot of evidence this is already happening, particularly on self check out tills, and a lot of people have confessed to doing this!


It will not be any hardship, or take more than a couple of seconds, for the check out staff to peek inside a bag to see contents and label tally. This is not a good enough reason for paper bags not to be reintroduced.

Of course it's going to happen that people incorrectly put stuff in bags to cheat the system, it's the same mentality that was in place with the bendy buses, if no one sees you not paying then it's not a crime and the risk of getting checked is so low that people will do it.


Seems that the self scan and pay concept is not something that the honest amongst us is going to not misuse 🤔 Sadly that's human nature


Years ago there were local grocers everywhere that used brown paper bags or newspaper to put customers fruit and veg into before putting them into the customers own bags and then came supermarkets who pushed them, the milkman, butchers and fishmongers into a virtual state of non existence , all for the sake of convenience and in so doing increased the amount of plastic waste we all had (plastic bottles rather than glass, veg pre packed in plastic and so on)


Maybe we need to turn back the clock, use local businesses rather than the multinationals. It may not be convienient (paying in different stores, not getting everything under one roof...) but there are advantages

1. Keeping more of your spend in the local community

2. A sense of community rather than a faceless organisation

3. Businesses who know and love their products and who can advise on how to use it

4. The ability to reduce plastic use

5. Potential for less food miles (if it isn't in season then you may not get it )

6. Less driving to large shops outside of the town centres (less pollution too)

7. Local employment guaranteed rather than centralised distribution centre employment possibly out of the area

8. Less food waste (no more perfect fruit and veg that the supermarkets think sells and return to misshapen fruit and veg full of flavour)


I know it's a dystopian dream and yes it harks back to the good old days of the pre 90s and more local businesses will have to reopen as a result but if people are not satisfied with the likes of sainsburys, Tescos and so on then don't whinge on forums like this but create a ground swell grass roots movement and go back to shopping in local smaller businesses, use a milkman again, demand will be met if it's there


Ps in the 60's to 90's all milkmen drove electric floats ... With the use of glass , home delivery and electric floats, where they ahead of the game and environmentally friendly only to be virtually wiped out by supermarkets greed !

We used to get milk & juice from the milkman for years then switched to getting them from International (now Co-op) when my mum realized he was regularly trying to overcharge us for his own profit. Never did buy from any of the greengrocers that had stalls on on LL as the thought of produce exposed to traffic pollution is disgusting. The food hygiene practice of the local butchers & fishmongers was also highly questionable in the 80s; they were not halcyon days of value & quality in ED by any stretch.

We tend to go to Sainsbury's - admittedly at times shelves are empty. Although I have considered on line shopping - I would only order non perishables as feel that staff do not look at sell by/use by dates on fresh produce. My deceased mother in law frequently had delivered meat/dairy products with a 2 day life span. I also like to pick out my own loose fruit and veg.


I feel that the increase use of on line shopping has resulted in too many closures of high streets including supermarkets. Whilst we shop at Roses, Farmers and tend to use ED restaurants and cafes, some of the prices charged are excessive (we are both pensioners) but understand that with the high costs of rent, many establishments have no choice.



Lidl is a good alternative to the usual supermarkets in terms of quality and price. Went into co op a couple of weeks ago and the majority of their prices were higher than of Sainsbury's.

twinhunters Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it just me or has this store gone downhill .new

> management maybe


HAsn't it always been pretty slack?


The wine selection is worse than Morrisons and Asda. Same goes for the beer. The fresh herbs section is underwhelming. The cold/mechanically pressed oils are lacking. The fish counter is dull. The meat counter gives you what you can buy from the shelf and not much more. The fish shelves are boring. The staff are always talking very publicly about their next breaks and when they're knocking off. And the carpark is dirty. For further disappointment visit the Starbucks.


Supermarkets are bloody awful places really!

SpringTime Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------- The fresh herbs

> section is underwhelming.



Bit surprised you say that.


I got a good sized pot of healthy Thai Basil there some time ago, and it's still going strong.


Never seen Thai Basil anywhere else in East Dulwich.

Sainsburys milk and bread prices have recently increased by 5-10p. Also for the past few months they never seem to have any sourdough bread in the tiny section they usually have it. It's getting like that for other sections in the Dog Kennel Hill branch for other foods and you would think they could keep these foods in stock. I now go to the co-op in Camberwell for sourdough bread.

Sainsbury's has gone down since Argos opened. They've reduced stock lines, the magazine section is now tiny with a random selection of titles that nobody wants except the tv mags.


Deliveries seem to be random with lines not being restocked for days.

Surely lack of stock is down to poor re-ordering, not getting shelves replenished over night, lines not being available either due to supply issues or lack of stock coming into the distribution warehouse, or just poor local management.


Either way, customers leave frustrated and either accept it or eventually shop elsewhere. My shopping includes currently going to the bakers in Nunhead, the butcher on Peckham Pk rd, possibly either Morrisons or Asda or Tesco either for specific items not available in other super markets or for specific brands or deals, and the inevitable trips every few weeks to Lidl again for specific items.

I had to go there about 7.30pm last night. It was a total scruffy, empty-shelved, dispiriting shambles and I could only get 50% of what I needed. Vegetables virtually all run out, empty boxes all over the floor and hardly any staff replenishing stock.


Several other customers commented on the state of the shop and were making calls home to say they couldn't buy what they where looking for and asking their "other half" what to buy instead!


I've made a complaint online today.

Went to Sainsbury on Thursday 11am. One of the staff members absolutely stank, I have never smelt a smell like it, I can't understand how they werw allowed to work with food when they clearly smelt like they haven't washed in a month. I was actually shocked.

I complained a few years ago about empty shelves, coupled with items on the wrong shelves (or maybe the right shelves with the wrong prices on). I emailed a load of photos with my complaint and received calls and emails within 24 hours. The manager called to say that they had used the photos in a training session and invited me in for a "guided shop." He was very helpful and said that they are aware of the problems and taking steps to rectify them.


That was about 5 years ago, and things never improved. It's got even worse. (Attached photo from a few months back).


Last week, I popped in for some fresh fruit at around 4pm and was told that the day's delivery had already sold out and the next delivery would come overnight. I guess that the ED store is constantly busy and they can't hold enough stock to get through the day. I wish they'd get rid of the tat section and dedicate the space to more display or warehouse space for food. I'm sure most shoppers would welcome the better food supply, even if it meant having to go elsewhere to get a saucepan or broken toy.


What forks me off most though, is that the loose fruit / veg is empty but they often have plenty of prepacked fruit and veg. This is a bit hypocritical, when Sainsbury's claims to have removed single-use plastic bags for the benefits of the environment. The manager told me that they would allow customers to break into prepacked goods when the loose shelves were empty, but I've never tried it.


It's not a new thing either - I've found this article from 2004 - sorry it's a subscriber article, but you get the gist from the first few paragraphs - https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sainsburys-crisis-is-laid-bare-2f7d2rcs2dg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...