Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just back to the original post - which I find quite intriguing - library services turning down free donations. I'm going to make an enquiry about how this practice has come about, as it strikes me the common sense policy would be to accept all donations buy a few more bookshelves and stock up, especially considering there will be a new library up at Grove Vale with twice the floor space to fill....


Lewis

a lot of times libraries would like to take donations but simply don't have the room or the donations are books they already have multiple copies of so the books just end up on the sale shelves or stuck in a back room taking up space. or the books they get are in such poor condition that they would disintegrate on the shelves. in theory most would love to ake all donations but sorting through the books,and then housing them until they can be sold or processed actually does take up a fair bit of time and space.


can you tell i used to work in a library?



donations are probably better off going to a charity shop in most instances unless you see your local library actively advertising for books.

The irony in all this is that LB Southwark paid to have Dulwich Library refurbished the other year and took out all the bookshelves that actually went with the building, installed new modern ugly too short and unstable free standing shelving units that don't go with the building - and spent not one penny on new books. I have been going to Dulwich Library since I was a child and it has never had a decent collection of books. Personally I get through a lot of books and look after them, and I would consider it 'bad form' to give a book to the library that I knew was falling apart, I would rather give them to a library where people could borrow them for free than to a however well-intentioned charity shop that will charge people for them. Call me picky.

I used to work ages ago as a library assistant and we did initally take donations but as was pointed out above, they took up an inordiante amount of space and we never had the time required to go through them, look them up on the catologue, label them, enter them in on the computer, etc. etc. Plus there was always the problem of books that were in poor condition or old textbooks that were so out-of-date they weren't accurate. And then we were lumbered with getting rid of these books which often took up about 40% of the donations. So we had to stop taking donations in the end


Seriously, it would be better to lobby the Council to increase the book budget than encourage donations of books to local libraries. Oxfam has several charity bookstores in London selling donated books.

If anyone out there has any books in French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Russian or Swedish, including old dictionaries, reference books or encyclopedias, that they don't want, I would be very happy to take them off your hands. Not bothered about the condition of the books as long as they don't actually have those little weevil things running about in them.
  • 2 weeks later...

Scruffy Mummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to work ages ago as a library assistant and

> we did initally take donations but as was pointed

> out above, they took up an inordiante amount of

> space and we never had the time required to go

> through them, look them up on the catologue, label

> them, enter them in on the computer, etc. etc.

> Plus there was always the problem of books that

> were in poor condition or old textbooks that were

> so out-of-date they weren't accurate.


Over the last twenty-five years I've always noticed that the IT/computer shelves of local libraries are always incredibly out of date. Generally by at least 10 years.


Many people would be willing to donate such books (l could restock Dulwich Library with a wide range of books on everything from human-computer interaction (generally only in uni libraries) to Windows apps (current versions) to... Subject matter is fast-changing and the books are expensive (mostly over ?25, many over ?35/40), making donations worthwhile I would have thought.


Though I've been a library member all my life, I so rarely use them now, as they rarely have books I want to look at. The most recent example was when I tried Dulwich Library for *anything* about running voluntary organisations/NGO's (a *huge* proportion of the population is involved in not-for-profits/NGO's/third sector orgs). They initially had two not very good, extremely old books, and within months both books were mysteriously 'withdrawn' and not replaced with anything. Library staff were at a loss to explain why this had happened, or why they had nothing at all on running third sector organisations. I gave up.




And then we

> were lumbered with getting rid of these books

> which often took up about 40% of the donations.

> So we had to stop taking donations in the end

>

> Seriously, it would be better to lobby the Council

> to increase the book budget than encourage

> donations of books to local libraries. Oxfam has

> several charity bookstores in London selling

> donated books.

I think your all being spectacularly naive(sp?) once again - Taking books off Joe Public = being a charity and not a subsidised council service and could well result in Mr or Ms councillor reducing funds/budget. Library is being politically smart. Does nearly everyone else on this forum live in a Camberwick Green share & share world of make and do/no political intrigue see you at the bandstand at 4pm world? (ok, that was Trumpton).
The answer to the question what is the council's actual policy will be provided in writing at Council Assembly this evening and I'll post it tomorrow morning. It is also interesting to note that the District Auditor's letter discussed at Audit Committee last week raised a concern that not enough Southwark residents are using our library services.....
The policy is that the library service will accept donations, on the understanding they meet a number of criteria; physical condition; currency of information;subject matter; potential for use and whether the item meets legislation affecting libraries. If they do not, they reserve the right to offer them for sale or reuse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...