Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just back to the original post - which I find quite intriguing - library services turning down free donations. I'm going to make an enquiry about how this practice has come about, as it strikes me the common sense policy would be to accept all donations buy a few more bookshelves and stock up, especially considering there will be a new library up at Grove Vale with twice the floor space to fill....


Lewis

a lot of times libraries would like to take donations but simply don't have the room or the donations are books they already have multiple copies of so the books just end up on the sale shelves or stuck in a back room taking up space. or the books they get are in such poor condition that they would disintegrate on the shelves. in theory most would love to ake all donations but sorting through the books,and then housing them until they can be sold or processed actually does take up a fair bit of time and space.


can you tell i used to work in a library?



donations are probably better off going to a charity shop in most instances unless you see your local library actively advertising for books.

The irony in all this is that LB Southwark paid to have Dulwich Library refurbished the other year and took out all the bookshelves that actually went with the building, installed new modern ugly too short and unstable free standing shelving units that don't go with the building - and spent not one penny on new books. I have been going to Dulwich Library since I was a child and it has never had a decent collection of books. Personally I get through a lot of books and look after them, and I would consider it 'bad form' to give a book to the library that I knew was falling apart, I would rather give them to a library where people could borrow them for free than to a however well-intentioned charity shop that will charge people for them. Call me picky.

I used to work ages ago as a library assistant and we did initally take donations but as was pointed out above, they took up an inordiante amount of space and we never had the time required to go through them, look them up on the catologue, label them, enter them in on the computer, etc. etc. Plus there was always the problem of books that were in poor condition or old textbooks that were so out-of-date they weren't accurate. And then we were lumbered with getting rid of these books which often took up about 40% of the donations. So we had to stop taking donations in the end


Seriously, it would be better to lobby the Council to increase the book budget than encourage donations of books to local libraries. Oxfam has several charity bookstores in London selling donated books.

If anyone out there has any books in French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Russian or Swedish, including old dictionaries, reference books or encyclopedias, that they don't want, I would be very happy to take them off your hands. Not bothered about the condition of the books as long as they don't actually have those little weevil things running about in them.
  • 2 weeks later...

Scruffy Mummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to work ages ago as a library assistant and

> we did initally take donations but as was pointed

> out above, they took up an inordiante amount of

> space and we never had the time required to go

> through them, look them up on the catologue, label

> them, enter them in on the computer, etc. etc.

> Plus there was always the problem of books that

> were in poor condition or old textbooks that were

> so out-of-date they weren't accurate.


Over the last twenty-five years I've always noticed that the IT/computer shelves of local libraries are always incredibly out of date. Generally by at least 10 years.


Many people would be willing to donate such books (l could restock Dulwich Library with a wide range of books on everything from human-computer interaction (generally only in uni libraries) to Windows apps (current versions) to... Subject matter is fast-changing and the books are expensive (mostly over ?25, many over ?35/40), making donations worthwhile I would have thought.


Though I've been a library member all my life, I so rarely use them now, as they rarely have books I want to look at. The most recent example was when I tried Dulwich Library for *anything* about running voluntary organisations/NGO's (a *huge* proportion of the population is involved in not-for-profits/NGO's/third sector orgs). They initially had two not very good, extremely old books, and within months both books were mysteriously 'withdrawn' and not replaced with anything. Library staff were at a loss to explain why this had happened, or why they had nothing at all on running third sector organisations. I gave up.




And then we

> were lumbered with getting rid of these books

> which often took up about 40% of the donations.

> So we had to stop taking donations in the end

>

> Seriously, it would be better to lobby the Council

> to increase the book budget than encourage

> donations of books to local libraries. Oxfam has

> several charity bookstores in London selling

> donated books.

I think your all being spectacularly naive(sp?) once again - Taking books off Joe Public = being a charity and not a subsidised council service and could well result in Mr or Ms councillor reducing funds/budget. Library is being politically smart. Does nearly everyone else on this forum live in a Camberwick Green share & share world of make and do/no political intrigue see you at the bandstand at 4pm world? (ok, that was Trumpton).
The answer to the question what is the council's actual policy will be provided in writing at Council Assembly this evening and I'll post it tomorrow morning. It is also interesting to note that the District Auditor's letter discussed at Audit Committee last week raised a concern that not enough Southwark residents are using our library services.....
The policy is that the library service will accept donations, on the understanding they meet a number of criteria; physical condition; currency of information;subject matter; potential for use and whether the item meets legislation affecting libraries. If they do not, they reserve the right to offer them for sale or reuse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...