Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A few suggestions that might help perk up the business:


extend the brilliant weekend brunch menu beyond the ridiculously early finish of 1pm (some people like to lie in and ease themselves into the weekend)


sell croissants / pain au chocolat with brunch menu - compete with Nero, the coffee's much better at Black Cherry anyway


liven up the tired lunch / evening menus that don't seem to have changed in ages and don't have any light snacky items on them


extend the evening food service for another hour or so


sell crisps


fix the wifi, which is often not working


ditch the poorly made day-glo cocktails and train the staff to make the original cocktails properly (bring back Jamie - the only one who could make them properly please....!)


improve the service - most of the waitresses are really friendly, but can be a bit scatty - they don't write orders down, forget side dishes, drinks, bills etc.....

mikese22 - "ana mhaith" for the practical and downright sensible suggestions


Allfornun - just stop it will you?


for the Columbo reference alone, Snorky wins bonus points (sorry katy)


I'm all FOR t'Black Cherry (ahem, I believe I was their first ever customer) but I am worried if their business plan is dependent on the outside area. That has been a non-starter from the get go and even if I agree with the business that locals are being pernickety (which I do) I'm not sure local councilors will do much to aid the situation


I will write and support the Cherry - but there must be more to it than "needing the extra spaces out back"

There are other ways this bar can survive... the family own the freehold on the building don't they? So no rent... what are the other huge over heads in running a bar? The biggest is staff... Now why do Black Cherry always have 3 or 4 people doing a job that 1 could do. Fewer, better trained and more motivated staff is what they need. A tightening up of service and an improvement in food (sorry, i know some of you like it).

Mikese22 - Jamie is back - well he was there on Saturday (been busy with college work I believe).


The story with the garden does go back to when it opened, when you could sit out there until 9.00, then even that stopped, due to complaints about the noise, so I find it hard to believe that not having this area, which really they've never had, would mean that they have to close.

I'm confused, when I read the leaflet they'd put on a table a while ago, I understood that they just wanted to have a "garden" area out back for open air drinking and smoking. They were saying it wasn't fair, as they were the only ones to have been refused this (to be fair, The Bishop has it, and that's only a couple of doors down).


I didn't realise from this leaflet that they had actually planned to extend the building out back... Or am I missing the point here?




RE: Jamie, he is indeed back, but he's in his final year of his studies, so don't expect this to be long term.

Lt. Columbo is very interested in motive here


What would cause an unconnected citizen to embrace this issue with such gusto and go so far as to post us email addresses for councillors and a link to an online petition ?


this must be a very very very special drinking establishment to have such dogged customer loyalty


* buttons up filthy mac & drives off in battered grey car with dog hanging out of the window*

I would, but I can't see the Cherry being anyone's "local" in that way... I could be quite wrong, but I have to admit the original post didn't feel particularly genuine to me either.


However, genuine or not, I like the Cherry, which is more than can be said for most places down Lordship Lane *spits in the general direction of the bishop*, so hope they're okay.

to reiterate - I have no beef with the Cherry & its punters at all - Ive been in a handful of times, had a bit of food, but have no great loyalty or view on the place either way - another non memorable / well aimed demographic niche drinking/ food lite establishment in ED - so its hardly unique


Hyperbole about the evil marxist council stakhonvites set to sneeringly shut the place down and cast its weeping destitute staff onto the mean streets of SE22 because of a clerical interpretation would seem to wide of the mark


Hijacking/ starting a thread to promote a possibly hidden agenda may not be a criminal offence, but is most definately a moral one


clarify the situation

Come on people, what's with the paranoia?

Admin is pretty good at spotting this sort of thing whether self promotion or mud slinging (see headnizm thread). I'm pretty certain Katy is who she said she is.

Do we have to alienate every new poster who finds a reason to break beyond the lurk?

Is it not perfectly possible to both:


a) not want Black Cherry to close

b) accept that BC wants to get the locals on side - and that a timely thread posted on the forum from a relative unknown who just happens to have to hand all the relevant emails of the people supporters ought be lobbying - might be the best way of doing so?


(Columbo accent) "And theres just one more thing that's botherin' me..."

Dear Forumites,


Hello, Hello, Hello,


My name is Angela and I am the owner of Black Cherry. I just want to let you know I did not write the original post nor ask anyone to do it on our behalf. There is a planning issue which we hope will be resolved on the 3rd April. I am happy to update everyone when I know more. Best wishes.



Kind regards


Angela x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me      
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...