Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I love the Hillcourtcouple. Its about time we got some proper rural values into the ED. I grew up in the rural Midlands (it exists). I shot and ferreted. Foxes and rabbits were my meat and drink, sometimes still twitching - but hey.


Nature is red in tooth and claw. Mr Fox will happily take your pet rabbit, white fluffy cat and gerbil. Make no mistake they will have your cuddly pets for supper with no qualms.


Get a grip ubanites, rural life has come to town and rural solutions are required.

ooo..i don't know mikewbate...i don't like the idea of foxes and their cubs being killed in this way. what if the trap doesn't kill them outright and they're trapped half dying in agony. also - what about the cats! these are people's pets. my neighbours would trap the trapmakers if their cat was killed like this. find it a bit freaky that people can rustle up such devices in their backyards, trap an array of animals then dig a pit and bury them - it's gruesome.

I believe foxes shouldn't be encouraged to stay in cities, the only reason they are here is because people feed them scraps and they eat the waste and rubbish we throw out. Here's a typical mangy city fox compared to a healthy country fox:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/FoxInHighPark.JPG/180px-FoxInHighPark.JPGhttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Vulpes_vulpes.jpg/200px-Vulpes_vulpes.jpg


The ones I see in London are like the one on the left and I think it's more humane to get them back to the countryside.

True Mark - but foxes are territorial - hence the pungent wee for boundary marking.


The coutryside is already fully populated by foxes - so they are pushing into the cities via railway lines - they trot long them rather than buy a ticket.


Dump an urban fox into the countryside and they will probably perish because they dont have a territory and will get beaten up by the sitting tennants and because they are pretty clueless when it comes to hunting - rural wildlife is wilier than fat urban rats, mice, pets and wheelie bins. Cubs are taught to hunt by their parents in the context of their territories - the urge to hunt is genetic, the ability is not.


The rural human population would also not take kindly to dumping yet more carnivores in their back yard and urban foxes being used to close human contact would be drawn to human habitation by hunger and so quickly get shot.

If we were all more careful with our rubbish and didn't leave things for the foxes to scavenge, maybe they'd go away.


Mikewbate is right - foxes would not hesitate in killing another animal for its supper. But that's their instinct, not a considered decision by mr fox! I don't think it's instinctive for humans to trap/kill animals. You can't really compare the behaviour of foxes and humans.

I am not overly sentimental about foxes (having been brought up in semi rural Midlands) and agree that we all have a part to play in ensuring that there is nothing for them to scavenge. When I first read Hillcourtcouple's thread I thought the foxes went to the pit alive...! Reading the subsequent threads I hope that I was wrong about that. I agree something should be done - on page 23 of the attached document the question of what Southwark Council might do about foxes was raised. It also talks about the use of traps.


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/Uploads/FILE_7084.pdf

Fox behaviour is instinctive and so they kill and cause mess. The human reaction is indeed not instinctive, but it is a reaction to fox behaviour. People have to decide what they concider to be acceptable.


Personally I have no problem with urban foxes. When I lived in the countryside I did have a problem with rural foxes because they killed livestock.

Mikewbate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The human reaction is indeed not

> instinctive, but it is a reaction to fox

> behaviour. People have to decide what they

> concider to be acceptable.

>


Why should we have the right to decide what is acceptable for a fox to do, and to kill said fox if it breaks our rules (rules that the fox isn't aware of?


It's a strange world, foxes get killed for eating livestock, simply because we're annoyed as we had intended to eat that livestock.... I'm not a vegetarian (much to the disgust of my better half), but I don't like human feeling of superiority over everything else on this planet... One could argue that that's how we've buggered the place up so much, through our own arrogance!


Ahem, sorry... *climbs down from high horse*

Keef that view holds only if you see mankind as being outside of nature. Which we are not. We are an organism that acts to procreate our species at the expense of others - much as other do, its the selfish gene. We are more successfull and so that is threatening our own future and the futures of other species. Our rape of the planet is as natural as the exploitation of a host animal by parasite. The death of the host brings the death of the parasite.


Farmers protect their livelihood from foxes. If somebody or something started taking your property from you, you would act to stop it. The fact that this results in the death of a fox is somewhat irrelevant in the context of those of us who are carnivores (me included) and are therefore complicit in the slaughter of many thousands of creatures in our lifetimes.


The main issue is that many people are dislocated by the death and destruction that facilitates our comfortable life style. We either start living more challenging life-styles or we accept the destruction.

But if the selfish gene leads the way, surely we should all just be running on instict, much as the fox does in killing it's prey.


If we have the capacity to realise that our actions are destroying our planet, surely our instinct for survival should lead us to then try to save the planet... No?

Unfortunately it is not a collective instinct - it is an individual or tibal instinct. So our individual or tribal instinct to survive and thrive means that we compete for resources at the expense of other individuals and tribes even if this will lead to the destruction of the collective whole. For instance if we had a collective instinct for survival the international control of CO2 emissions would be easy; the more tribal survival instinct means that India, China and the US in particular are unwilling to give ground.


Thus we are all stuffed.

Have any of you been watching Adam Curtis' documentary about freedom all gone wrong.

Boiled down to it's bare minimum it says that much of our post war social topography (particularly post 70s) has been driven by theories from mathematicians who modelled us all as being inherently selfish creatures wh oare always trying to get one over everybody else to maximise our own chances of survival/income/comfort/breeding lines.

The problem being that this basis for the model of a market led society was ultimately bollocks, and we do have things like social bonds and altruism.


Interesting stuff, though he does push it on ocassion (Yes Minister as thatcherite propaganda anyone?!?!)


Oh yeah, foxes. pigeons are nice in Letchworth and manky in london. Same goes for foxes, it's not the noisy sex that annoys me, no worse than drunken students heading back to halls on denmark hill, it's the nasty mangyness. Pest like any other i say.


To paraphrase, a pigeon is a rat with wings, a fox is a big rat with good PR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...