Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As a general concept it's spot on.


LadyD earlier claimed that shadowy corporate paymasters are behind the apparent inherent conservatism (with small c) of post Thatcher governments, when of course it's the electorate who are responsible for squeezing politics to a narrow centre, and wer so lacking inspiration for a solution to the crisis of neoliberalism, that they couldn't even pick a government to do anything about it.


Contrast that with the Italians who picked someone who explicitly said they weren't going to do anything about it, yay with that moral high ground peeps, down with Thatch (yaaaawn).

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its a simple point, "dont speak ill of the dead"

> is a nonsense. Hitler was a complete @#$%&. There

> I've done it, I've spoken ill of the dead. I feel

> terrible.


Yes Mick Mac I have grasped that its a simple point. I have spoken ill of the dead like you. I don't feel terrible. But thats not quite what I meant when in my poorly explained previous post. (to be fair, no-one understood me when trying to explain it IRL so perhaps I'm talking bollocks)


what I'm trying to say is that all this "you mustn't speak ill of the dead" is being deliberately used by people who either wish to suppress criticism of Thatcher/Thatcherism or by those who are eager and delighted to boot the in no matter what 'the thought police' say. nah, I'm prob still not making sense. my head hurts.

I suppose the benefit we'll all take from Thatcher's death is that it'll strip any remaining relevance from dinosaurs linked to the Miners' Strike, who've just lost their last excuse to sit around feeling sorry for themselves. Everyone else who was advarsely affected by Thatcher's policies seems to have moved on, except, of course, the self-pitying losers around the abandoned collieries who still cling to past grievances in order to justify the moral and economic ditch they live in.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> when we had the north sea oil money and

> privatisation in full swing?

>

> Not so many. I know, I'm as surprised as you!

>

> We did have a big recession at the start and at

> the end of her reign tho. So it wasn't all gravy

> and prudence


it was true that she did indeed squander the revenues from the North Sea oil & gas fields on the resulting 3 million unemployed (whether that figure was due to decimation of manufacturing base or not, I dunno).


I think its really interesting to now have a constructive debate about politics and I'm glad to see young and older people having discussions. Despite (in my view) the narrow-mindedness of those celebrating/protesting/whatever in Brixton, Glasgow, Bristol I suppose it helps to remember the old adage of "I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to do so".


PS I concurred with what Huguenot said too. apart from last bit, like EP.

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>> Its a simple point, "dont speak ill of the dead" is a nonsense. Hitler was a complete @#$%&.

>> There I've done it, I've spoken ill of the dead. I feel terrible.

>

> Yes Mick Mac I have grasped that its a simple point. I have spoken ill of the dead like you. I

> don't feel terrible. But thats not quite what I meant when in my poorly explained previous post.

> (to be fair, no-one understood me when trying to explain it IRL so perhaps I'm talking bollocks)


I think there is a difference between Hitler, Bin Laden etc. dying. Their deaths stopped bad things from happening. Somehow, the death of a little old lady with Alzheimers didn't really change the world.


> what I'm trying to say is that all this "you mustn't speak ill of the dead" is being deliberately

> used by people who either wish to suppress criticism of Thatcher/Thatcherism or by those who are eager

> and delighted to boot the in no matter what 'the thought police' say. nah, I'm prob still not making sense. my head hurts.


I don't think anyone is trying to suppress criticism of Thatcherism. But people aren't reaching for that sort of debate by doing things like trying to get 'Ding Dong The Witch is Dead' to the top of the charts, are they?

I think there's an element of death being the ultimate expression of retribution, a sense of 'I hate you, ha ha I'm alive and you're not' amongst many who felt genuine anger and were certainly well within their rights to do so (unlike, say the champagne quaffing hipster foetuses with their 'down with the bedroom tax' posters) regardless of the wider geopolitical macroeconomic factors behind their plight.


Of course this is something of an empty victory over an 87 year old who died of natural causes.


Personally I'd really like to see Blair get something scary and painful in the not-too-distant future.


Maybe he could put his (mouth where his) money where his mouth is and inhale some atomised Depleted Uranium, that would be far more satisfying than my future sextegenarian self raising a quiet glass of cava after he dies of old age in his four poster bed having bought Blenheim Palace on the proceeds of advising faceless corporations on how to exploit new opportunities in the middle east....



nnnnnghhh cool wet clowns.........

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The trouble with socialism, is that sooner or

> later you run out of other people's money." -

> Margaret Thatcher

>

> Louisa.


Louisa! - the first sensible thing I have heard you say :)

Grace Dent nailed it: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/grace-dent-thatchers-children-we-may-be-but-these-death-parties-are-just-childish-8567288.html


Pretty much bang on. (Except omission about all parties supporting phased removal of milk and no other party re-instating it when they had the opportunity.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...