Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Background:


This afternoon I was sitting on the wall by the River Thames opposite the London Assembly building in the sunshine. Sitting on Thames side walls or railings in the sunshine and watching the world go by is something I have enjoyed doing for most of my life in London. I was told by a security attendant to get off the wall ?for my own safety?. When I queried this, pointing out that at my age I was perfectly capable of making decisions about my own safety, the attendant changed his line telling me it was against the rules.


I pointed out that rules and regulations that are not publicised are of little value in guiding the public?s actions and queried what the rules were for but the security attendant was unable to explain. He then reported my failure to ?obey the rules? by radio and went away, returning some 5 minutes later to again tell me to get off the wall. I again queried the rationale and again he was unable to explain. I continued to sit on the wall in the sunshine. The attendant berated me for my lack of obedience but decided to then walk away and ask others to stop sitting on walls.


As an instinctive libertarian I object to being told what to do for no good reason. The wall runs alongside the Thames and forms part of the Queens Walk from Lambeth Bridge to Tower Bridge ? something created in 1994 for the public?s use and enjoyment. The land however, is owned by a private company called "More London".


I am not aware of any regulation that makes it illegal to sit on a riverside wall. I can only conclude that either "More London" staff are making up arbitrary rules for no real purpose or that "More London" is so risk averse that it wishes to prevent enjoyment of normal Thames side pleasures in case someone does fall into the river and is sued. If it?s the first reason the staff needs better training, if it?s the latter the management need to take a more robust and balanced view of life and risk.


Question- Was I unreasonable?


I'm tempted to organise a mass "wall sit on" just for the fun of it.


Edited to change "sit in" to "sit on"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3150-was-i-unreasonable/
Share on other sites

Taking a photo might be a dangerous proposition now as this seems to be joining the list of civil liberties being eroded. I was stopped and questioned by 2 PCSO's recently when doing an innocent recce at an 'iconic' London building (not Parliament).


Watch this short film: No Photography

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Watch this short film: No Photography


Oh no - it's Sunday morning; I was feeling very chilled out and happy, now I've watched this film and I'm feeling MAD AS HELL. What has this government done to our civil liberties? Who can we vote for that will put an end to this nonsense? Oh man, and I was so chilled.

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Were you in breach of Bye-law 56?



Definitely not - tho' a cool glass of beer would have really enhanced the pleasure of sitting there in the sun.


Thanks to all poster for general support. It encourages me that we should all ignore / protest against petty officaldom, if we don't then the overbearing bureaucracy will grow ever more.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I'm tempted to organise a mass "wall sit on" just

> for the fun of it.

>

> Edited to change "sit in" to "sit on"



I'm with you all the way.

Let's take a week off work and spend it on the wall

When is this happening?

Have to admit I opened your thread to see if you were having one of your crazy rants at chav, but I have to say I agree with you on this sitting on the wall thing. Instead of the next forum drinks we could all go to that wall and sit there for an hour together. A forum outing.

We could even make it a yearly thing and have some sort of "protest" for things like this that are annoying (although not relatively important). We could get that guy Mark Thomas to come along.

Local authorities etc are increasingly handing over what were public spaces to private organisations. There was a good piece - book extract - in the Observer/Guardian a few weeks back - covering in particular a case in Liverpool where whole streets are being lost from the public sphere, as well as the situation in Chinatown in London.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/mar/29/communities


I'm with you on this. Not unreasonable behaviour at all.


And as it happens, the local authority has been trying to change bye laws to stop people cycling along the Thames path near there too. Quite a stink thrown up by cyclists when this was found out.

We're all with you MM! I've been told a couple of stories this week of people being stopped filming near various public buildings. Is this an erosion of civil liberties or is it a case of too many people being employed to do too little? The recent explosion of PCO's on our streets to 'protect' us in this terrible terrible war on terror need something to do, and frankly out on the streets there's bugger all to do except hassle innocent people. I'm sure if you were of arabic persuasion, scoping out Whitehall with a camcorder, wearing a large sign calling for jihad and death to all westerners, you would be left well alone as to interfere would be against you're human rights. There does seem a disproportionate amount of these noddies about to tell you to get off the wall, stop filming, stop looking, stop drawing, stop talking, just shut up, go home and watch T.V.,as though we are living under the mujahideen. It reminds me of the scene in Persopolis where the grandmother has to kow tow to the man who used to be her window cleaner. A little uniform goes a long way......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
    • In case anyone is renovating or stripping out an old kitchen, I am looking for a base kitchen unit or carcass to house an oven for a temporary set up kitchen.   Also looking for a run of worktop at least 180 cm long if anyone is disposing of something like this, I would be happy to collect.   thanks   Mila
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...