Jump to content

Recommended Posts

furryjumpergirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whatever its cultural background, I find it hard

> to separate the symbol from the movement it's most

> famous for. Having a swastika positioned at the

> entrance to my street at the moment is horrible.

> Walking past it is horrible. Wondering whether

> cars driving past assume my lovely street is now a

> Nazi /Neo-Nazi stronghold is horrible!



somehow i doubt it.

Those who doubt that fascism is alive and well in 21st century Britain only needs to check their voter's card today.


If the BNP get 5% of the vote (and they came v close before) they automatically get a seat on the London Assembly. I doubt if the timing of this graffiti is coincidental.

It would be nice if some group or other would adopt the swastika as a sign of something positive almost relaunch it, in order to take it away from neo-nazi / stupid bast@rd types.


Would be a bit like "Buddy Christ" in the film Dogma, it's all about the marketing!


http://blog.osministry.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/lol_buddy_jesus.jpg

*Bob* I've edited my original post; I said that the symbol was used by the nazi party without going on to say that it has subsequently been adopted by neo-nazi organisations. I realsie this was inacurate (a sloppy oversight, my apologies) and have changed it.

I hope this avoids detention as I have dinner plans tonight.


With that small correction, however, I stand by my original post. I am also not asking people to take to the streets in hysterical, reactionary response to a bit of badly drawn graffiti. I am simply saying that any evidence of possible neo-nazi activity or feeling most certainly warrants discussion.

So, assuming that swastikas daubed on walls are bad ? and I think most sane people on here would agree they are ? what's the best course of action? I was going to paint over the one on Fellbrigg Road, but I think it's on someone's house. Would I get any funny looks if I tried to cover it do you think?
The danger of that is that someone may mistake you for the culprit and thump you before you get the chance to explain that you are actually covering it up, or if it is on a house might prosecute you for defacing the property, call the Council, they are usually pretty quick where racially offensive grafitti is concerned.

mattham Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Would I

> get any funny looks if I tried to cover it do you

> think?


That's a tricky one. Someone might think you'd had one too many in Palmerston, did it on the way home and (having sobered-up the next day and realised your error) rushed out to cover the evidence.


In any case the council might fine you for defacing council property - by way of one of their 'Nazi' wardens.

mattham Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was going to paint over the one on Fellbrigg

> Road, but I think it's on someone's house. Would I

> get any funny looks if I tried to cover it do you

> think?



Did said house have a large St George's flag hanging out of the upstairs window? If so, we may have found our culprits...

Yes the Council are good at this stuff - if people report it! I spoke to them at about half 3 and they said they'll be out within 4 hours to sort it out. I could only tell them about The Gardens one, if anybody else knows locations ring them on 020 7525 5777 - also a handy number if you have noisy neighbours!!

Blimey, I've missed a lot of discussion.


*Bob*, seems my comment annoyed you - apologise if that was the case, it certainly wasn't intended as a lecture. It was intended to express mild amazement and in hope that you would go into more detail. Sorry if it came across wrongly.

furryjumpergirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes the Council are good at this stuff - if people

> report it! I spoke to them at about half 3 and

> they said they'll be out within 4 hours to sort it

> out.


Rolo Tomasi did say he had reported it to Southwark around midday on Wednesday.

I guess the question is whether they have all been reported? And have any/all been removed now?

I saw some Council guys removing the one at the end of my road and one on the bus stop round the corner early this morning - they seemed quite taken aback when I thanked them profusely! I told them there were more dotted around and they said they'd have a look. Perhaps the ones Rolo reported were in a different area?
So a StGeorge's cross is Nazi now......mmm....what a stupid PC load of crap. You see loads of different people of all races with StGeorges' flags during the World Cup...its somehow only a symbol of naziism to highly idiotic PC white libersls who still think it's the 1980s (or in more extreme cases the 1960s)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...