Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Foxhelp Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> what do you expect, its people sitting around with

> nothing to do although they would deny this



Can I remind people. There is golf on tv for 12 hours a day for the next 3 days. So you do have something to do.

if anyone remembers when certain lyrics from a Pogues song were SEVERELY misconstrued, then that tells you everything you need to bloody know about the knee-jerk-I'm-offended-and-reading-waaaaaay-too-much-into-it goings-on in this thread, over a comment that, I suspect, was an absolutely shit, nay, pathetic attempt at levity.


am firmly with otta, d-c, el pibe et al. I was glad when otta asked on page 1 what people were up in arms about because I didn't get it. at all.


oh and I feckin hate the Dulwich tandoori (service+food). not many places on my 'hate' list either.


edit: meant to say, not that I wish a raid on their premises. must have been very traumatic for all of the staff :(

UKBA or whatever they are called now, dont randomly hit premises - they have targets to hit and tryt not to waste time hitting places when they feel like it- its always intelligence based. Quite often, its tip off from competitors. Sometimes its known aliases showing up as being used in gainful employment somewhere- that NI/ID card being used by one employee could be one of many being used with the same detials.Maybe a disgruntled customer or a competitor tipped them off.


fact is, theres a shortage of legit Indian/Asian chefs in the UK and its not getting any easier for them to work here


cue usual Guardian link : http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2012/jan/08/britains-curry-crisis-chefs-immigration

Dog duck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps Sue should try their 'C S Lewis masala'

> it's like the chicken tarka masala, but a bit

> naania.


Doesn't work quite so well I'm afraid...


numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feckin hate the Dulwich tandoori


Oh dear. I think we're going to fall out over this.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But many other people who already think some races

> are unclean


Apologies if I'm putting words into your mouth, but this sounds like walking on eggshells in case your "joke" is confused with other people's prejudice.


I'd understand why people might do that, but that's not the way I'm hard-wired...

This is how I feel in London, now.


However in Cities further afield in the past (not that long ago)

some amazingly bad things were said on a daily basis.


So maybe it's a reaction - and will all mellow out.


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But many other people who already think some

> races

> > are unclean

>

> Apologies if I'm putting words into your mouth,

> but this sounds like walking on eggshells in case

> your "joke" is confused with other people's

> prejudice.

>

> I'd understand why people might do that, but

> that's not the way I'm hard-wired...

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Can I remind people. There is golf on tv for 12

> hours a day for the next 3 days. So you do have

> something to do."

>

> Are you mad? The honour of the nation is at stake

> a mere eight miles away.


Lee Westwood might save the honour of the nation. Don't miss it. Cricket lasts all summer.

*adjusts specs*


After the painful events for everyone over the last day or two on this thread, have been recommended by Admin to share with you this 10 minute video, which I think conveys quite clearly ways in which future communications on the EDF could vastly improve.


SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yep, UncleBen's comment is offensive, but he's

> an

> > offensive little pr@&k anyway, so what else

> would

> > you expect?

>

>

> WHo is it offensive to?



I found it offensive.

Shall each of us try saying clearly what our needs are?


All my life I watched how easily trust could be smashed and never get rebuilt. The consequences are rarely confined to just a couple of protagonists. Hate speech spreads outwards.


Fellow commenters can see with me how computers bring the evergreen challenge to develop successful new modes of behaviour, to cope with modern technology. Humans had to do that for thousands of years after each innovation so why should this one be any different?


Watching people exploit the option for online anonymity to treat forums like this one as an outlet for aggression, is a sign that new strategies need to evolve PDQ.

Talented and highly motivated folk will go away feeling oppressed by website din and crudeness of comment. This is not OK especially when matters of local harmony concern everyone in teeming, multicultural places.

I feel it is necessary for this aggression to stop or personal confidence and the rest of the group's integrity gets compromised.


I would like to help all find it is safe to comment on the EDF as equals. Not as people's playthings, stereotypes or torture objects, but as part of a wiser creative force called humanity, making a fitter place for all our grandchildren.


Developing new codes is one of the brilliant, everyday possibilities of being on line the way I see it. It's easier than dealing with confined material space. Nobody has to like another person, only foster true awareness of own needs.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I feckin hate the Dulwich tandoori

>

> Oh dear. I think we're going to fall out over

> this


*narrows eyes*


*rolls up sleeves*



to be fair, I think I could forgive bad food on occasion and give 'em another chance but I just can't forgive bad service (as well).


think the wonderful fred siriex noted similarly, that people are more forgiving of rubbish food than they are of shockingly rude/bad service which for some reason sticks in the memory more. (added to that the fact you've got so many of same to choose from within spitting distance of each other..)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...