Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I take back what I said about thoughtful process - agree with unlurked that lice is a big problem, and disappointed that there was no provision for anti-lice upholstery in the planning application.


Suspect they have also forgotten about a pedestrian barrier / cattle grid to ensure that offending patrons (e.g. old people and young children) emerging from the darkness of the cinema into the light of the street are prevented from causing unnecessary traffic disruptions.


I vote for Lord of the Flies.

strae Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Suspect they have also forgotten about a

> pedestrian barrier / cattle grid to ensure that

> offending patrons (e.g. old people and young

> children) emerging from the darkness of the cinema

> into the light of the street are prevented from

> causing unnecessary traffic disruptions.

>

Actually if you'd bothered to visit the presentation or view the photo of the proposed scheme posted above you'll see the pedestrian barriers which are already there will stay, probably for the exact reason you've stated.

Actually AF, I find it much easier to form opinions without the benefit of having seen the applications.

I leave it to more diligent citizens of the EDF to argue points of detail - I will stick to being outraged on principle.



Arthur Facksake Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> strae Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > Suspect they have also forgotten about a

> > pedestrian barrier / cattle grid to ensure that

> > offending patrons (e.g. old people and young

> > children) emerging from the darkness of the

> cinema

> > into the light of the street are prevented from

> > causing unnecessary traffic disruptions.

> >

> Actually if you'd bothered to visit the

> presentation or view the photo of the proposed

> scheme posted above you'll see the pedestrian

> barriers which are already there will stay,

> probably for the exact reason you've stated.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The pedestrian barriers on the pavement are likely

> ot be removed. They're a hangover from when it was

> school 20+ years ago. I had the ones on Archdale

> Road from the previous school there last year.



It has started. . .

Years from now, as alien explorers pick through the wreckage of planet earth, someone will look back at the lost civilisation of Humans and rue the apparently innocuous trigger point for all the terrible horrors that were to follow... the Picturehouse Dulwich.

reddulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For a first film, on one of them they should show

> the Australian film 'The Castle' its about

> development and planning, but more importantly

> someone seeing their home as their Castle, and its

> a great family film too.



Dad, I dug another hole



Since James Barber was one of the prime movers in encouraging Picturehouse to come to ED, this is a pretty mean comment.


E-dealer, I suspect that you won't be voting Lib Dem this Spring (and indeed neither will I), but please try to keep politics out of this and be pleased that ED will probably be getting a much needed asset.

E-dealer, please tell me why James B would want to get the cinema project cancelled when, as I said, he is one of the people who encouraged Picturehouse to come to ED. Or is there some Machiavellian conspiracy afoot that is too difficult for us ordinary mortals to comprehend?


More to the point, why does at least one poster have to post negative messages on EDF when there is for once some potentially good news?

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The pedestrian barriers on the pavement are likely

> ot be removed. They're a hangover from when it was

> school 20+ years ago. I had the ones on Archdale

> Road from the previous school there last year.


What evidence can you back this claim up with, as stated before they are clearly depicted on the artist impression of the completed development. For someone supposedly supportive of the project a statement such as yours is extremely negative and potentially harmful.

reddulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For a first film, on one of them they should show

> the Australian film 'The Castle' its about

> development and planning, but more importantly

> someone seeing their home as their Castle, and its

> a great family film too.



Tell 'im he's dreamin.


:-)

Someone mentioned the pedestrian barriers outside the cinema. I reference the existing barriers on the PUBLIC FOOTPATH are probably going to be removed.


The proposed fencing spelling out Dulwich Picturehouse is part of the proposed cinema. I;d prefer them to East Dulwich Picturehouse but either way they look a nice touch on the drawings exhibited on Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s irrelevant to compare Corbyns vote to Starmers. They were two different elections with two different turnouts.   The only relevant comparisons for Corbyn are how many people voted for Theresa May and Boris Johnson. A lot more in both instances. As such there would be nothing fair about him winning.
    • It is not Labour Party members who elect Labour governments, as it certainly isn't Conservative Party members who elect Conservative ones. It is all those who are not party members who actually make up the sufficient numbers to elect governments. 
    • Thanks for these responses. Yes, Cllr Browning & Cllr Hartley did a door-knocking exercise a couple of months ago. It was Maggie Browning who knocked and I told her that I'd had radio silence from Jon Hartley. She looked embarrassed but not surprised. I have spoken to him since, only after writting to Ellie Reeves, our MP about it his lack of response. He agreed to address the issue I asked about but I've not heard from him since. It's really not acceptable for an elected Councillor to consistently ignore his ward constituents. Since it's clearly not a one-off, I'm gonna pick this up formally. I'll let you know how I get on...
    • If memory serves, Labour under Corbyn got more electoral  votes than Labour under Starmer. So I'm not sure how you can call that being "unelectable"? Under a different and fairer electoral system Labour would have won. I see moves are afoot to bring in such a different, fairer system, presumably in the hopes of stopping Reform winning next time. BTW there was a mass exodus from Labour  by  the local (East Dulwich) Labour party members when Corbyn was kicked out by Starmer. It isn't just Islington who doesn't want to support  a right or centre right Labour party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...