Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Between 3% + 5% of the population have a diagnosable, anti-social personality disorder and they all drive cars, ride bikes, walk or go on public transport. 97%-95% of motorists, cyclists and pedestrians get about in a perfectly thoughtful and considerate way - so can we please get a sense of perspective on this? Don't forget that most cyclists are also drivers or pedestrians when they are not on their bikes: they don't come from another planet.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And commuters need to travel by car because....?


They travel onwards from their work place- perhaps visiting many sites

They have equipment

They visit clients


I imagine a relatively small amount of rush hour traffic is private cars

never been struck by lightening, but have been struck twice by cyclist on pavement, also just this morning TWO cyclist breaking the law by crossing the red lights at crossroads at Kings arms one of them undertaking a lorry which was turning, sounded horn to warn him of danger and was greeted by two fingers, theres a lot to be said for cyclist, guess what I'm saying?
Two cyclists undertook a left hand turning dumper truck at the junction of bermondsey street and long lane/abbey street, on my commute this morning. One was a Boris bike, one was what looked like an experienced lady cyclist (she had all the gear anyway). The bloke waiting behind the truck with me sighed and said, "they'll never learn".

If we're off onto anecdote again - I tapped on the window of a car driver last night to inform her that her brake lights weren't working (she'd braked sharply as she'd noticed quite late that someone was using a zebra crossing she was about to drive over and almost caused the people behind her to crash into her).


She thanked me, and explained that she couldn't stop to talk right at that moment as she was on the phone.


She then waved the phone that was in her hand (i.e not a hands free set), and drove off. She chatted on the phone all the way from ED to Vauxhall as I travelled on the same route.

snowy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If we're off onto anecdote again - I tapped on the

> window of a car driver last night to inform her

> that her brake lights weren't working (she'd

> braked sharply as she'd noticed quite late that

> someone was using a zebra crossing she was about

> to drive over and almost caused the people behind

> her to crash into her).

>

> She thanked me, and explained that she couldn't

> stop to talk right at that moment as she was on

> the phone.

>

> She then waved the phone that was in her hand (i.e

> not a hands free set), and drove off. She chatted

> on the phone all the way from ED to Vauxhall as I

> travelled on the same route.



This is why more cyclists should be filming drivers behaving like idiots. I was going to post a YouTube clip, but there are so many I couldn't choose one!

susiq Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> never been struck by lightening, but have been

> struck twice by cyclist on pavement, also just

> this morning TWO cyclist breaking the law by

> crossing the red lights at crossroads at Kings

> arms one of them undertaking a lorry which was

> turning, sounded horn to warn him of danger and

> was greeted by two fingers, theres a lot to be

> said for cyclist, guess what I'm saying?


That's pretty much my experience. Not unsurprisingly I moan about the things that adversely affect me on a regular basis.

All the posters who keep saying 'breaking the law'are doing my head in. There are times when it is sensible to cycle on the pavement and doesnt adversly impact anyone. Have all these posters never gone over the speed limit driving(even at night on an empty motorway), even once?

Just to put some perspective into pavement cycling in Japan, I would often hear news reports of people being killed due to accidents involved with pedestrians being hit by cyclists, especially when people cycled down shopping arcades. Injury [often serious] from collision with cyclists on the pavements over there is pretty common, so please don't take Japan as an example of where everybody gets on fine with pavements being used by bikes. In the bigger cities with police boxes on blocks it's usually harder for people to hit & run [but this of course still happens].


http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/02/04/reference/cyclists-who-flout-law-face-charges/


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jan/10/japan.transport

The articles don't say whether there has been an increase in cycling to correspond with the increase in accidents and there is no comment on motorist behaviour or who was at fault in the accidents that led to death. The figures include all accidents involving cyclists and there is a high number if cyclist deaths where motorists were involved. Not very useful without additional information.


And here we have a crack down on pedestrians:


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/20/us-fines-texting-and-walking


:-)

About 30 minutes ago, one of my colleagues was knocked over by a cyclist who came shooting around the corner of St John's Lane, on the pavement, and hit her square on. He then cycled onto the road, went the wrong way along St John St, and disappeared into Clerkenwell. She's just emailed from the back of an ambulance.

The reason cyclists don't use the pavements as often as they could is nothing to do with the law or the adundance of super safe cycle lanes, no, the reason we dont see many pavement peddlers in ED is all down to the menace of the pram pushers.


Yeah, you pushers know who you are, weaving you're way along the North Cross Road pavements on market days shamelessly forcing pavement walkers into the paths of pavement peddlers - fuelling the f®iction.


This thuggery has got to stop.

The prams really should be licensed as well for identification puurposes - most of them have never even taken the pushchair test. I bet none of them contribute to the pavement tax either. One of them ran over my foot when I was buying my organic cous-cous on Saturday and I cried all week. Tears of blood they were. We need a week long push by a team of community wardens to deal with this menace.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My friend just called me to say that a car driver

> levitated 6 ft off the ground and swooped down on

> cyclists and pedestrians alike in his flying car.


I'm assuming from your pointlessly sarcastic response that you don't believe me. OK, when my colleague comes in tomorrow, I'll get her to come on here and tell you exactly what happened to her herself - she can quote directly from the police report. She's gone home today, bruised, aching all over, and very very angry.


Oh and you saying 'oh that'll just be you taking the lie further so it won't count', as I feel you're about to, will just be an indication that whatever those who are angry at dangerous cyclists say is automatically discounted by you, so that won't count either.

I hope your friend makes a good recovery a fish. I know I should know better but as a cyclist I feel a deep sense of shame and embarrassment when I see other cyclists defending the indefensible practice of cycling on the pavement. It has been said eleventy million times already but if you feel unsafe cycling on the road (and I wouldn't tackle the Elephant & Castle roundabouts or Vauxhall Cross) then get off and push! If you don't feel unsafe on the road then get off the jeffing pavement.

alldownhillfromhere Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Voyageur Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Chick Pea Wrote:

> > ... fuelling the f®iction.

> >

> >

> > I like what you did there...

>

> Get a room you two ;-)


Don't you have an ASBO?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...