Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have unfortunately had squatters move in to a house opposite us. Last night, they played incredibly loud music until about 3.30am? I may be getting grumpy in my old age, but I do feel it's a bit out of order on a Monday night!! This isn't the first time this has happened. The house is partially boarded up so there isn't even a front door to bang on!


Does anybody have any ideas of how you deal with this sort of behaviour? having done a bit of investigation this morning, it seems squatters have an incredible amount of rights!!! So I have no idea how to proceed... any advice would be appreciated!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/
Share on other sites

Unfortunately you're not in a great position to evict them if the property isn't yours :'(


Noise abatement notices can be served, contact Southwark Council as per this page.


Having suffered this, I can't recommend strongly enough that you start the process immediately. If you wait three months until you've reached the end of your tether, you'll still have to take another 3 months to go through the process and that'll drive you insane.


Please do download the noise diary and start filling it in now - if the problem goes away then you've wasted 20 secs, if it threatens to stay then you've created a lifesaver!


Best of luck!


PS Anyone know how you go about finding an original owner?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/#findComment-7656
Share on other sites

Thanks Huguenot. I wasn't expecting to be able to evict them, I just want some peace and quiet! I have just downloaded the noise diary and taken a note of the noise teams phone number!


I have a feeling the house is either owned by the council or a housing association. It's such a shame, it's a beautiful, big house.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/#findComment-7668
Share on other sites

If it's council owned, I'm sure they'd have people living there, properties are so few, and waiting lists are so high!


I can confirm that Southwark "sound police" will act quite quickly (having once played guitar at a party, and had them threaten to take my beautiful guitar away!!! :-$ ).


Best of luck Leah

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/#findComment-7686
Share on other sites

i was chatting to neighbour in matham grove about the house recently, said it was owned by a small housing association. They vacated it but did not turn off supplies such as electricity/ gas . Squatters moved in quickly after. It is a shame cos this house is one of the nicest and largest in road.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/#findComment-7692
Share on other sites

It's owned by an association called Carr-Gomm who initiated formal eviction procedings a while ago. As far as I understand, there was a court hearing last week at which they got approval to evict the squatters but I don't know when this will happen. I think they're planning to redevelop the house in the next few months so hopefully it will be back to its former glory soon.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/#findComment-7754
Share on other sites

Yes they are squatters, same family as the ones in peckham rye (along the park.. another nice property left to rot few years ago ) just before Friern Rd in the ex-children home ( Believe owned by the council ).

Actually this branch of the squatters will open the door when someone knocks ( the door is part of the metal boarding ), the squatters complained about a party last saturday night held by their politican neighbours... Said it was too noisy until early hours of the morning..HA..HA...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/#findComment-7851
Share on other sites

I work with Carr-Gom now and again and they are a reputable association with a good rep. They will do all they can to get rid of the squatters as believe me, they are the last thing any HA want. ( I work for a HA you see)


Perhaps phoning the local Carr-Gom manager would be a move - I am sure they will be happy to help and let you know timescales. Aslo SASBU may be able to help (Southwark Anti Social Behaviour Unit).


Buring them out is the last option! Don't leave any prints though!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/375-squatters/#findComment-8206
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let them go bust.  Enact emergency legislation to ensure that the water still flows and the rest of the network operates. Why should we care what happens to the investors.  Have no idea could or would this work, and where next. And the workers will still be needed whoever runs the show.
    • I think you might mean 'repossession' rather than 'reprocessing'.  
    • I think this is a bit of a myth.  It's true that some of the current owners are pension funds (chiefly the Ontario Universities') but they're global outfits, big enough to know what they're about. As for ordinary UK pension funds, they mostly invest in publicly-tradeable stocks, which Thames no longer is (it's a private limited company, not a PLC), so even those that lazily track the markets by buying everything in the index won't be exposed as Thames isn't in any index. In other words, it's a lot less complicated than Thames, the Government or innumerable consultancies and PR outfits would like you to believe. In case, incidentally, the idea of a cooperative offends any delicate Thatcherite sensibilities, I'd argue that it fits the Thatcherite vision of a stakeholding democracy much better than selling tradeable shares to the public very cheaply. The public, despite their blessable cottons, are too easily tempted by the small but easy win (which is how they sold off their own building societies, preparing the ground for the credit crunch and then the crash) and, as became obvious after every privatisation before or since, their modest stakes inevitably end up in the hands of financial engineers whose only priority is to siphon off the assets and leave the husk to either go bankrupt or get "rescued" by the taxpayers (who thus get to pay twice for nothing). The root of that is the concept of "limited liability" which makes it all possible, but even the most nauseating free-market optimist would struggle to predict the demise of that.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...