Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My husband's debit card as well as mine were cloned this afternoon. Long story but we believe it was at the HSBC cash point on Lordship Lane. I suggest that if you used this cash point today, you check with your bank that there aren't any suspicious transactions on your account.


Big thumbs up for HSBC which cancelled my card immediately.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3778-card-cloning-warning/
Share on other sites

MadWorld74 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> both the HSBC machines have been tampered with. It

> diesn't take a genious to spot it.



Actually, smatypants, almost all of the cash machines in London have been tampered with in the past and still bear the scars -- the banks remove the illegal devices when they find them but don't put in a brand new machine.


So it isn't that easy to work out which machines are rigged to defraud you.


In short, you are wrong.

Just for the sake of those of us who have been victims of card fraud recently, what exactly is it that we should look out for on cash machines? Cameras, odd bits of hardware, dodgy types hanging around...?


Do the banks check their machines regularly and is this something that is more likely to happen when the bank is closed or at weekends?


Advice from someone with a bit of security knowledge would be very helpful...

> Just for the sake of those of us who have been

> victims of card fraud recently, what exactly is it

> that we should look out for on cash machines?

> Cameras, odd bits of hardware, dodgy types hanging

> around...?


Any of these. Here's a possibly useful selection from a google 'uk atm card skim' image search:


http://www.bustathief.com/2007/08/atm-fraud-or-cash-money-theft-is-as-old.html

http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2006/03/30/fraud-or-feature/

http://www.strathclyde.police.uk/index.asp?locID=1204&docID=-1

Yesterday the machine took an unusual amount of time to spit out the cash -- probably because the computer had been hacked into by a skimmer. That was the give-away for me. However by that time, the fraudsters had the data they needed so it was too late.


In less than 15 minutes HSBC had blocked my account and stopped anyone stealing any money -- so great service from them. Even though it is shareholders money, not mine, that they are saving by blocking the account, it has saved me a lot of hassle.

Here's a full proof way to avoid having your card cloned. Although the device fitted will read the magnetic strip for the operation to be complete the small pinhole camera secreted in the attachment covering the original installed by the bank has to record your P.I.N. To avoid this simply type in your pin with your other hand covering what your busy hand is doing. It's actually quite easy and you'll be doing it without realising it after a while.
When you say it was cloned without the pin being compromised do you mean it was used on an internet transaction where the pin isn't required. My post was only aimed at those using an ATM. If you want safe internet transactions only use an account with a set amount in it with a no overdraft policy, thats how I do it and I've never had any dodgy attempts on my funds.

Shaggy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MadWorld74 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > both the HSBC machines have been tampered with.

> It

> > doesn't take a genius to spot it.

>

>

> Actually, smatypants, almost all of the cash

> machines in London have been tampered with in the

> past and still bear the scars -- the banks remove

> the illegal devices when they find them but don't

> put in a brand new machine.

>

> So it isn't that easy to work out which machines

> are rigged to defraud you.

>

> In short, you are wrong.


IN SHORT, SHAGGY, YOU DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT ME SO PLEASE DON'T GO ABOUT WAGGING YOUR SARCASTIC FINGER IN MY GENERAL DIRECTION.


I have a friend who works for one of the high streets bank who has to deal with card cloning/skimming on a daily basis.


They have given me all the pointers to look out for on all types of ATM's. And they differ from bank to bank.


But because I have been met with undue sarcasm on this thread, you can all go to hell in a handcart.


Loose all your savings I couldn't care less.

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can you enlighten us non-genius types as to how we

> should spot a tampered with ATM then please

> Madworld. I for one haven't got a clue what to

> look for. Thanking you in advance for your

> advice.


Dear TT


A while back one of the ATM's at the HSBC in Lordship Lane had it's card slot ripped out from the front of the machine. There was what looked like acid that had been thrown all over the ATM facia, and to top it off there was a carton of drink rammed into the gapping whole where the card slot had been.


Pretty obviously tampered with, wouldn't you say?


Your welcome.

I don't think anyone mentioned a drink's carton until your goodself MW74 and weirdly, there were no drink's cartons sticking out of the machine when I used it, nor any signs of acid having been thrown over it. I'm not sure I would try to put my card into a ripped out slot with a drink's carton in its place!

Please tell us what to look out for as I think that sort of information should be shared with the group.



Punctuation edit, must keep up standards!

Sam T Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now that fuel is so expensive why not try some other fuel, here is the link below

>

> http://knowledgepublications.com/gw3h2/gw3h2_landing_selector.htm


It appears to me Asset, that the car shown in the link does look like it's had acid thrown over it and I'm sure there's a drinks carton stuffed in there somewhere - so maybe it's actually a mobile ATM that's been tampered with. Reminds me of that Dads Army film when they converted a van to run on gas. What goes around....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.”
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...