Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh dear. Just been done myself. $1000 Candadian dollars taken from my Lloyds TSB debit card in Quebec yesterday. Was in Canada 6 weeks back but only used it a few times and never at an ATM. Now have to fill in a load of forms to get it back. But the banks must be getting stung. And someone doing this 5 times a day is getting very rich.

As it happens, I'm off to Benin in a couple of days, where some of the cards on this thread have been used. I'm not planning to use my card while away (from past experience there's not going to be many places to actually use the card!) but I thought I should inform my banks.


One bank said that they can't make any note on my account but I should just go ahead and use it. Which doesn't fill me with confidence, because I would hope a transaction in Benin would be flagged up as unusual activity.. either I would be unable to use my card, or someone doing it illegally would be able to! However HSBC have put a note on my account and have given me international helpline numbers - they said it still may be flagged as unusual activity, but they would try to call me if they were concerned. Not sure what to make of their responses!

Hi All, Just to let you know that I used the Barkelys bank ATM this morning (the one on the corner) and it had a thing over the card slot- then I checked all the other Barkleys ones and they did not have this thing. I cancelled my card straight away and I would suggest that you all avoid this ATM until the bank opens on Monday.

Hopefully it is nothing, but better to be safe than sorry!

I've not had my card cloned (yet!, *touches wood* etc)


However, my bank have been very good for checking when my card is used abroad. I recently tried to pay for a holiday in Italy and the Italian holiday company had the payment rejected and I had to phone the bank to authorize. And when I was in Dusseldorf last winter and the girl at the hotel didn't know how chip and pin worked (tried to put card in, type in payment, remove and then get me to enter pin), they called me on my mobile having put a block on further payments until confirmed if the payments were ok. And when I last went overseas I let them know in advance so they didn't block my payments and they didn't have a problem with noting that on my account, or mess up and block any payments.


So, if you want to bank with someone good, try First Direct - give pretty good service overall, not just in this matter. They don't have any of those annoying "press 1 to get lost in a chain of menu options, press 2 to get put through to the wrong department, press 3 to get put on hold for 10 minutes and cut off" menus on their phone line. I hate those things!


PS I don't work for First Direct/HSBC, just in case you are wondering.

Hi,


As in my previous messages, you should alway's cover your busy hand, look to see if anyone is parked nearby that may be using a covert camera, and if you cannot do that use a bank that allows you access into the bank out of hours or a post office to withdraw cash. At the end of the day you do have a duty of care, the money provider could possibly refuse to reimburse you if you have been negligent.


Please refer to my ealier posting's which will advise you of the suspect shops and ATM's in East Dulwich.

Take care.

Libra Carr.

I called First Direct yesterday, and spoke to - among others - their fraud department.


No, they cannot do a global block on all overseas payments on a card/acount, they told me (in response to my question). If effect, every transaction is treated individually


I do travel abroad regularly, but tend to use cash for small local payments, so would prefer all overseas activity to be blocked on this particular account (I have other accounts for business travel). But no can do.


Their fraud department says payments are analysed according to

1) 'we know where you are' (but they didn't know I was in The Hague and Nottingham over the last week, for example, so I'm not quite sure how that works. Presumably this can only come into action if there is a suggestion that you are in two places simultaneously)

and

2) a list of countries with known problems. They confirmed that Canada is on that list, but also said the do not reveal the last and 'even we don't have that list'. They did confirm that The Netherlands is not on their list, which might suggest that the Netherlands is chip and pin (ie in principle more secure). However, I made two card payments in Amsterdam and The Hague last week and only in one case was a pin required....

>Hi All, Just to let you know that I used the Barkelys bank ATM this

>morning (the one on the corner) and it had a thing over the card slot-

>then I checked all the other Barkleys ones and they did not have this thing.


For information, here are photographs I took at 12:28 today of the Barclays ATMs, on LL and the corner of LL/Ashbourne Grove, respectively. It's clear, BTW, from photos of the full fascia, that the machines are different models. I didn't see or feel anything that seemed obviously amiss or appended, and my amateur assumption is that they're both currently in their natural state.


But can anyone definitely confirm that the initial slot bit in the second is standard (probably an anti-tamper device?) and not a skimmer?

Im away to the USA next monday with my trusty old nationwide card, I have been told that The Usa are hot on fraud, that is why they have not used the chip and pin service, so il see what happens when im there. After i posted last about the Dodgy Hsbc atm i was told it was ok, because our lovely PC mick bell had a look. Strange the Barclays Atm is going through the same thing. I now use cash in supermarkets. I say bring back signature, obviously chip and pin is not fraud proof, and why dont the americans use the same system. (?)

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I say bring back signature,

> obviously chip and pin is not fraud proof, and why

> dont the americans use the same system. (?)


xxxxx


Anybody can forge a signature, it's easy - anyway, most people never checked them very thoroughly, just a quick glance, in my experience

In the States now they ask for a number to be entered which is the zip code connected to the card rather than a PIN. Not much good if you are not from the States! Had to use a signature instead.


Libra - you do mention covering the keypad but the card can be cloned without the PIN being taken.

One of the main security holes for cards is that the PIN for the chip is the same as the PIN for the mag stripe. This was raised in security circles before chip'n'pin was introduced, but they went ahead anyway on the (admittedly pragmatic) basis that people would never remember two PINs for one card and the vague hope that the mag stripe could be phased out at some stage. Magnetic stripes are trivial to reproduce; chips are much harder, but not impossible.


Given the explosion in the amount of fraud, I expect that the banks will solve this 'unsolvable' problem sometime soon as it the loss level becomes greater than the fix-it cost.

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Im away to the USA next monday with my trusty old

> nationwide card, I have been told that The Usa are

> hot on fraud, that is why they have not used the

> chip and pin service, so il see what happens when

> im there. After i posted last about the Dodgy Hsbc

> atm i was told it was ok, because our lovely PC

> mick bell had a look. Strange the Barclays Atm is

> going through the same thing. I now use cash in

> supermarkets. I say bring back signature,

> obviously chip and pin is not fraud proof, and why

> dont the americans use the same system. (?)



Monica, Just make sure you have your passport with you at all times because in the States they will ask you for ID (usually drivers license) and they may not recognise a UK one (assuming you don't have a US driver's license!). I don't know why we don't use chip and pin in the States. Too complicated perhaps?! :)

-C

Beth


Are you sure the station itself is taking money from your card? Or do you suspect the card was cloned there and money is being taken from it elsewhere.


Many people seem to be assuming that the (high volume!) locations mentioned are "in" on this when that isn't nevessarily the case. They are more likely targeted because of the number of customers and then the criminals move on to somewhere else

In the future, card companies will be able to locate you (at least technically). For extra security they could read the GPS info off your cell phone to ensure you're located at the same place the transaction is being made. Of course this will not work for telephone/internet transactions, so no system is infallible. The criminal would then have to steal your mobile or somehow fake the GPS location (not that hard actually, but replicating the GSM packets is tricky), although relatively simple algorithms could detect if you've suddely managed to travel at the speed of light to such places as Canada! In a decade or so, mobile phones will replace cards anyway and I'm sure this technique will be used. For internet transactions, 'Verified by VISA' will eliminated some of the online issues.


Someone else has already mentioned a password rather than PIN system where only 3 characters are requested. There is a cost issue associated with this though and also an issue of customer error/slowness. Remember, credit card companies make their $$$ on the vast number of transactions, so they don't want to slow this down!


As for ATM machines, I'd recommend to the banks digital image recognition. A camera/digitiser installed in the machine that can recognise if a device is attached. If this is the case - the machine would shut down and potentially activate a solenoid mechanism to eject given attached device! Pretty easy to implement, although prone to abuse. Other measures could be a photo of the card reader on the terminal screen to ensure the user knows what the reader 'should' look like. A simple redesign of the whole reader is required ideally, such that every machine is consistent and customers know what to look for.


There are dozens of ideas such of these, but the truth is, it's still cheaper for the banks to refund the customer from their insurance-backed fraud reserve accounts. VISA/Mastercard/AMEX/etc I think take the hit for non-ATM based fraud, although I may be wrong.


Other ATM security measures include: retinal scanners, finger-print readers, push-style card readers, random questions such as press 1,2 or 3 for correct address/DOB/phone number etc. The list is endless, but the banks can't be bothered. It's a small issue in comparison to their entire balance sheet!


For card readers, these are harder to make secure, since the retailer can manipulate/copy or do pretty much what they like. Why VISA/Matercard ever allowed non-secure wireless/BT readers is anyone's guess, but these must be removed from service! They would be transmitting the full card number, PIN, etc every time a card is inserted. Personally, I have always refused to use one and I'm currently (touch wood) one of the few that's never had a card cloned (I also ask my bank for a new card every month or every time I return from a holiday - just in case! They must think I'm very clumsy ;) )


We're of course talking about a global issues, so chip and pin and other such measures are pointless unless every country in the world adopts! You think VISA/Mastercard want to put up that capital?


Btw - does the aforementioned (less than)super market use wireless C&P terminals? I suspect the staff are using concealed cameras in their sleeves/shirts. This is the only way I can imaging they'd be able to clone in such quantities. I'd love to walk in that place with a radio/bug detector. Wouldn't be surprised if they're transmitting that data over to someone sitting in a dodgy LL bedsit or something. These criminal gangs are much more sophisticated than most people imaging and let's face it - how hard is it to get a job behind a supermarket checkout?


Chip and Pin was a complete waste of time in my mind. If anything it make it's worse, since the ATM pin is the same as the VISA pin, so cash can be taken from an ATM if someone gets a glimpse of you typing your pin at a retailer. Money would have been better spent on a random question process in my opinion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...