Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigtony2 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Inside job. No such thing as bad publicity ! Will

> put up the artists value ...... boring.


xxxxxx


I think that's highly unlikely.


Very sorry to hear about the theft, I really liked the picture :(

It is definitely not an inside job, I know.

If you remember what the painting looked like recently, the stik people had wobbly legs. Not Stik's style at all. In May that piece was tagged and as Stik was too busy to come and mend it, and not wanting the tag to be there where it might attract more tags, I touched it up myself. Really badly. So the bottom half is by a middle aged woman who has never held a spray can before in her life! Shades of that old woman in N. Italy touching up a 15th century fresco thought to be by Leonardo! Poor thief!

IngridB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is definitely not an inside job, I know.

> If you remember what the painting looked like

> recently, the stik people had wobbly legs. Not

> Stik's style at all. In May that piece was tagged

> and as Stik was too busy to come and mend it, and

> not wanting the tag to be there where it might

> attract more tags, I touched it up myself. Really

> badly. So the bottom half is by a middle aged

> woman who has never held a spray can before in her

> life! Shades of that old woman in N. Italy

> touching up a 15th century fresco thought to be by

> Leonardo! Poor thief!



This is the post I love x

easytiger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Ingrid,

>

> Do the building owners in the area get paid for

> these murals on their properties? Do any need

> permission from the council?


No, neither the artist nor the building owners get paid, all this is free public spirited stuff. The wall owners often pay the artists' expenses - paint, hire of scaffolding etc. 3 pubs gave them food while they were painting. The pubs, cafes etc have noticed a lot of increased business as people come from all over the place to see the murals and buy in Dulwich. Its win win. (unless you dont like the murals).


And no, you dont need permission for wall paintings, but you do for the mushrooms (on top of Mrs Robinson and Franklins Farm Shop). Im struggling with the council now to get retrospective planning permission, as I hadn't realised you needed it and they are threatening to take them down.

How sad that it's been taken. I love the murals, although they're not all to my taste, I like the colour they add to the area. The fact that the tours bring lots of people to the area is a real bonus for local businesses.


Ingrid - I've noticed the mushrooms but didn't know what the story behind them was - can you help?

IngridB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> easytiger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hi Ingrid,

> >

> > Do the building owners in the area get paid for

> > these murals on their properties? Do any need

> > permission from the council?

>

> No, neither the artist nor the building owners get

> paid, all this is free public spirited stuff. The

> wall owners often pay the artists' expenses -

> paint, hire of scaffolding etc. 3 pubs gave them

> food while they were painting. The pubs, cafes etc

> have noticed a lot of increased business as people

> come from all over the place to see the murals and

> buy in Dulwich. Its win win. (unless you dont

> like the murals).

>

> And no, you dont need permission for wall

> paintings, but you do for the mushrooms (on top of

> Mrs Robinson and Franklins Farm Shop). Im

> struggling with the council now to get

> retrospective planning permission, as I hadn't

> realised you needed it and they are threatening to

> take them down.


Thanks. Why do you need planning permission for those particular ones?


Have you seen Colin Harrington's mural?

I'm really sad this Stik has been taken. I really love the local street art.


Hopefully with Ingrid's "touch up" it won't go far.


easytiger - you'd need planning permission for the mushrooms as they are an external addition / fixture. They presumably don't fall within the 'permitted development' rights.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That the leaders of our country are wealthy people comes as a shock to you? How ridiculous.  Why shouldn’t they be living in those houses?  
    • No such thing as a “witch hunt” against a taxpayer funded public figure. Especially someone in charge of finances.    It is the responsibility of a landlord to ensure the agent acting on their behalf has done everything required to validate a tenancy. And to double check that too. Stop justifying it as some sort of ‘oversight’ purely down to the agent.    Also, I’d question the socialist credentials of a Labour chancellor owning a beautiful detached house on a private estate close to the edge of Dulwich Village. Great Brownings, according to some media outlets. What a s**tshow.    Louisa.    https://southwarknews.co.uk/area/dulwich/southwark-faces-calls-to-take-action-against-chancellor-rachel-reeves-who-is-accused-of-breaking-housing-rules-when-renting-out-dulwich-home/
    • Was the property in one the wards Southwark added last November? It would be a bit harsh if it was and Southwark didn’t notify residents and landlords. 
    • Yes it's a witch hunt, but that's what the press does. Optics are almost more important than policy these days. If the public has even a whiff that a government isn't trustworthy, or is chaotic, that feeling lingers like a rotten smell.  It's another comms catastrophe for Labour - every time there's a story they rush out a knee-jerk denial, without verifying the facts. They did it with Raynor and it was a shit-show. That's what Labour keeps getting wrong. Reeves should have been gagged and told by someone with an ounce of sense to first check her emails. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...