Jump to content

Flightpaths over ED


Leaf

Recommended Posts

Gimme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Depends where you live. If you live towards the

> bottom end of LL or near Goose Green on the SE15

> side or between LL and Peckham Rye Park, you will

> hear the planes big time! Particularly when

> sitting in the garden.


xxxxxxxx


Yeh I live off North Cross Road, Goose Green end of LL, and I find the planes very irritating.


I hear them start up in the morning if I haven't been sleeping too well, and that's the worst because once one has gone over I lie and wait for the first stirrings of the next one in the distance.


I've been here twenty years and they've got a lot worse. It's been great without any lately.


I do still miss Concorde though, I didn't mind the noise at all then because the plane going over every day was so beautiful to look at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and now the stream erupts. Just been woken for the third time by a plane coming overhead (Barry Road). First person to paint "Come on, Katla" on their roof gets ?100 from me. I'd quite enjoyed being the breacher of the peace by leaving for work at 3.30am, but ho hum.


Moz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you find the planes annoying then consider joining HACAN - Heathrow Action Campaign Against Noise.Or equally Plane Stupid and Fight the Flights for London City Airport flights.


East Dulwich tends to be at southern end of flights going into land at Heathrow and slap bang on one of the London City Airport approach circuits. London City Airport is planning 50% expansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I honestly cannot beleive that people can hear the

> planes that much. Police sirens and lorries are

> twenty times louder!


I've noticed a massive increase in aircraft noise since first moving here in mid 80s.


The worst ones are perhaps the 4.30-5.30am planes that come in one after another: there's no gap in the noise between them: as soon as one starts to fade the next one is coming in.


Then the late night ones, when the ambient noise level is low.


Police sirens happen once in a blue moon. Lorries I never hear. Pneumatic drills are sporadic. But aircraft noise is continuous.


I really enjoyed the break from it. Enjoyed the ability to have silence, and not to have to turn on the radio to mask the aircraft noise. And to be able to sit in the garden listening only to the birds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Police sirens happen once in a blue moon.

Not where we live they happen all the times as well as the ambulances.


>An aircraft free day once a month. Perhaps the first Sunday of every month.

And who would foot the bill to the country and the airlines? They estimate each airline loose about ?130 Mill. each day they do not fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> >An aircraft free day once a month. Perhaps the

> first Sunday of every month.

> And who would foot the bill to the country and the

> airlines? They estimate each airline loose about

> ?130 Mill. each day they do not fly.



They wouldn't lose that much if they planned for not being open on that day - people would travel on the saturday or the monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

expat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >Police sirens happen once in a blue moon.

> Not where we live they happen all the times as

> well as the ambulances.

>

> >An aircraft free day once a month. Perhaps the

> first Sunday of every month.

> And who would foot the bill to the country and the

> airlines? They estimate each airline loose about

> ?130 Mill. each day they do not fly.


Airlines are not charities. They are not owed a living by anybody. And at present, they are not paying for their externalities, on this and on other counts. We should all be sending them a bill for the sleep disturbance of hundreds of thousands of Londoners week in, week out. Then they might review their behaviour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An aircraft free day once a month. Perhaps the

> first Sunday of every month.

> More urgent would be no night flights. It can;t be

> right to have many 100,000's of peoples sleep

> disturbed to allow a dozen or so planes to land to

> maximise airlines profits.


No night flights would be all well and good, but where are the planes taking off from?? With the distances covered and differing time zones it smacks of NIMBY-ism... don't want the UK's sleep disturbed so lets disturb another countries sleep by taking off in the middle of the night there.


I heard a plane in the early hours of this morning but only because the foxes fighting/mating had already woken me from slumber!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi buggie,

I once caught a flight back from Canada. It left late afternoon and arrived at 5am. I didn't want to land at 5am and it could have left later from Canada without disturbing anyone's sleep. The reason it did these things was because it could.

If this pattern was'nt allowed they would have flown it somewhere else instead.


Apparently very few night flights each night around 14 but boy are they disruptive. I've read that all the orginating locations have other flgihts landing at civilised times in London. So clearly not a problem to rearrange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...
I live in Adys Road and the first flights overhead are around four thirty am, they arrive at intervals of 1 to 2 minutes and this goes on throughout the day. Standing on Peckham Rye Station you could easily count over a dozen planes on approach and stacking. It is simply horrendous and never used to be this way. We are 20 miles from Heathrow and I cannot imagine what effect the increased flight traffic will have our environment/sanity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They have. They asked in the original consultation. I’ve talked about it above. Around 3000 people (57% of a self selecting sample), were against the scheme. But the point you seem to be struggling with is that it wasn’t a referendum. We don't routinely have referenda on matters public policy in the UK (Brexit aside). We elect people to make decisions and then we judge the quality of those decisions in the round, and either re-elect them, or kick them out. That’s representative democracy. It’s not a good idea imo, but happy to listen if you do want to make the case for the routine use of referenda in matters of public policy. Not so much if you just want to use it selectively for a single issue you feel strongly about. Still ducking the question I’ve posed to you more than once now on claim of inadequate signage and intimidation of emergency services I note. I actually think the majority quietly support the local LTN. Certainly polling across London shows most Londoners support them generally. The local elections also suggest that most people either support it, or don’t feel strongly enough either way for it to stop them re-electing those who oversaw the implementation. Again, I don’t believe in routinely holding referenda on matters of public policy. There are many reasons for this but that's another thread. Hopefully any sensible person reflecting on it for a second will understand the reasons why it wouldn’t be desirable. As above, if you're just interested in using it selectively for a single issue you feel strongly about, I'm not really interested. ....Still waiting for someone to defend One Dulwich’s claims as laid out above. 🥱
    • Sounds like you are running scared of the idea Earl, come now with so much debate over what is a consultation /referendum surly it's a simplel way of settling the argument 🤔 
    • Pot holes feel like they’re becoming more of an issue (based purely on my perception, don’t know what data there is). Even worse outside London imo. I suspect as Mal says, heavier vehicles are part of the problem (both SUVs, but also EVs which are generally heavier than ‘conventional’ cars), but regardless the council need to be more on it.  You can use the fixmystreet app to report them (and other street maintenance issues). 
    • Prior to the LTNs do you have many examples where the results of consultations were not acted upon? Seems to me the council is picking and choosing when they action the feedback from their constituents.......   Have you looked at the results from that, if not, tale some time to have a look, its quite enlightening..it seems the majority do not think the changes will have the desired effect....but you know it's not a refendum so the council has chosen to ignore the feedback of constituents. They must be assuming full responsibility for ignoring residents feedback- clearly they think they know what's best for us. If it all goes wrong let's see if they take responsibility!   Earl, here's a question for you (and i know you wont answer it but lets see)...why do you think the council has never asked a yes/no question to local residents about anything to do with the LTNs - wether they exist or whether we think the changes they have suggested (using our money) are needed/worthwhile? Or a consultation with a yes/no answer but we all know why. I still laugh that the council had to re-run the CPZ consultation with a yes/no answer and finally had to listen to their constituents...they took a hell of a spanking! They have been cheating the system for years and getting away with it. So does that not apply during consultations then? (P.S before you answer take a look at the definition of a consultation as provided by the Local Government Association).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...