Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone checked out the brochure and planning guidance document on the sale of ED Police Station?


http://search.knightfrank.co.uk/krd131892


Brochure: http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/public/fetch/5490


http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/view/east

Password: dulwich


http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/public/private_view/318


Planning Guidance: http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/public/fetch/5699


Apparently the deadline for bids was 25th Oct and bids are now being considered by the MPS. Looks like housing is the preferred option but I hope Waitrose made a bid!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/39464-east-dulwich-police-station/
Share on other sites

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Flats. End of.



You're probably right. Although they might go for a mixed-development, new homes and retail (jobs) would seem like a winner. Not sure how residents of LL would feel though. A bit like this this one in Guildford? http://www.constructionenquirer.com/2012/11/08/waitrose-store-and-flats-plan-in-guildford-approved/

The site should be used for community use - as it was when a police station. Certainly in planning terms their would be a presumption for any piurchaser choosing to apply for planning permission for a non community use to prove no community use needs exists.

IF it were to be sold for non community use, and I'm anticipating it wont be, then we would have ample proof of real community use needs and planning permission I hope would be refused on this basis.

One of the most likely sites for one of the two new Harris free primary schools for East Dulwich emerged to be the East Dulwich Police Station.

This site is owned by the GLA/MOPAC and negotiations to purchase it have been very ongoing shall we say.


To encourage things along The Dulwich Society has very kindly agreed today to apply to Southwark Council for the site to be listed as a community asset under the 2011 Localism Act and we be allowed to buy it for community use.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue think this is your quote.  It wasn't binary, good Vs bad, and Corbyn had a lot of popular support, as evidenced by the previous election. He had aot of good policies, some picked up by others since. He was defeated by a mixture of a right wing press,good targeting  but the Tories, 'Get Brexit Done" and for some that Johnson was a funny loveable rogue/fool/liar/philander/opportunist.  I wouldn't see perceived least worst candidate out of the two major parties as being "good sense'.  We imagine that Corbyn would have been terrible, but we don't know.  He would have taken a stronger line against Israel in Gaza, not sucked up to Trump nut on Russia?  
    • We have had 4 greyhounds - the last one, a bitch, was not speyed so we  had to pay for that at our local vet.  Only one dog was nervous around children and only one was cat friendly.
    • Apologies on the tardy reply, but thank you everyone for your responses and suggestions! Unfortunately I couldn't attend the recent EDF drinks because of work (I know right). But will absolutely keep eyes peeled for the next one and try and come down! 
    • Because of the weather which delayed completion with roofer only being able to work certain days, it was up from November - end of January. Went slightly higher than gutters (we also had guttering replaced).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...