Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone checked out the brochure and planning guidance document on the sale of ED Police Station?


http://search.knightfrank.co.uk/krd131892


Brochure: http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/public/fetch/5490


http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/view/east

Password: dulwich


http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/public/private_view/318


Planning Guidance: http://www.inst.knightfrank.com/public/fetch/5699


Apparently the deadline for bids was 25th Oct and bids are now being considered by the MPS. Looks like housing is the preferred option but I hope Waitrose made a bid!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/39464-east-dulwich-police-station/
Share on other sites

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Flats. End of.



You're probably right. Although they might go for a mixed-development, new homes and retail (jobs) would seem like a winner. Not sure how residents of LL would feel though. A bit like this this one in Guildford? http://www.constructionenquirer.com/2012/11/08/waitrose-store-and-flats-plan-in-guildford-approved/

The site should be used for community use - as it was when a police station. Certainly in planning terms their would be a presumption for any piurchaser choosing to apply for planning permission for a non community use to prove no community use needs exists.

IF it were to be sold for non community use, and I'm anticipating it wont be, then we would have ample proof of real community use needs and planning permission I hope would be refused on this basis.

One of the most likely sites for one of the two new Harris free primary schools for East Dulwich emerged to be the East Dulwich Police Station.

This site is owned by the GLA/MOPAC and negotiations to purchase it have been very ongoing shall we say.


To encourage things along The Dulwich Society has very kindly agreed today to apply to Southwark Council for the site to be listed as a community asset under the 2011 Localism Act and we be allowed to buy it for community use.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No such thing as a “witch hunt” against a taxpayer funded public figure. Especially someone in charge of finances.    It is the responsibility of a landlord to ensure the agent acting on their behalf has done everything required to validate a tenancy. And to double check that too. Stop justifying it as some sort of ‘oversight’ purely down to the agent.    Also, I’d question the socialist credentials of a Labour chancellor owning a beautiful detached house on a private estate close to the edge of Dulwich Village. Great Brownings, according to some media outlets. What a s**tshow.    Louisa.    https://southwarknews.co.uk/area/dulwich/southwark-faces-calls-to-take-action-against-chancellor-rachel-reeves-who-is-accused-of-breaking-housing-rules-when-renting-out-dulwich-home/
    • Was the property in one the wards Southwark added last November? It would be a bit harsh if it was and Southwark didn’t notify residents and landlords. 
    • Yes it's a witch hunt, but that's what the press does. Optics are almost more important than policy these days. If the public has even a whiff that a government isn't trustworthy, or is chaotic, that feeling lingers like a rotten smell.  It's another comms catastrophe for Labour - every time there's a story they rush out a knee-jerk denial, without verifying the facts. They did it with Raynor and it was a shit-show. That's what Labour keeps getting wrong. Reeves should have been gagged and told by someone with an ounce of sense to first check her emails. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...