Jump to content

Recommended Posts

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think her character was more believable in the

> second series. She was too overdone in the first

> one, but seems more settled now.

>

> Maybe someone did a bit of research on

> asbergers/autism this time round!


I liked both seasons, along with the original language Wallander, Engrenages and The Killing not as much.


Find the whole idea of the bridge being (been?) remade as an Anglo French 'the tunnel' abomination slightly cringeworthy.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40914-the-bridge/#findComment-717432
Share on other sites

The Americans remade The Bridge with a female American detective and a male Mexican one - it worked quite well but not as good as the original I thought, and the second series was even better (I wonder if the Americans will remake this one too). Apparently a third series is being made so we'll find out exactly what has happened re Martin and Jens.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40914-the-bridge/#findComment-718778
Share on other sites

Surely there is no doubt that Martin has offed Jens? Saga admitted to Martin that she committed a crime and stitched up her mother. There must be some trade off in this?


Will they prove Martin did it without Saga's know how? Is this to come?


They have a fooking eco terrorist to catch FFS!


Cannot wait until Series 3. Sadly I reckon it will be about 2 years?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40914-the-bridge/#findComment-718804
Share on other sites

Nah!! Its all supposition.


Saga came to a logical conclusion because:

1 - poison is missing

2 - Martin has access to the poison

3 - Martin blames Jens for the breakdown of his marriage

4 - Martin visited Jens in prison

5 - Saga saw Martin drop an empty coffee cup into a litter bin

6 - Martin habitually takes coffee for Jens in Prison

7 - Jens has died, possibly by suicide, possibly not


Saga told Martin that "I know what you did", Martin said "Yes you do", but are they talking about the same thing?


There is still nothing to say that Martin killed Jens.


If Martin killed Jens, he will be in prison for all of the next series and that is not going to work.


I think that the next series will start with Martin completely pissed off at Saga for dobbing him in for something he didn't do when he was distraught and vulnerable after he was kicked out by his wife. Then people die and other stuff happens ...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40914-the-bridge/#findComment-718907
Share on other sites

Jens asked Martin to help him commit suicide as Martin had got to him. Martin let Jens poison himself and disposed of the tainted coffee cup. Manslaugter not murder. Saga will destroy the cup evidence and Martin will get off, and they will both have evaded the law, and carry on sleuthing.

The next series will not include the ecoterrorist as he got away,unsolved,end of. Great prog.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40914-the-bridge/#findComment-718959
Share on other sites

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Saga told Martin that "I know what you did",

> Martin said "Yes you do", but are they talking

> about the same thing?


Not quite. Martin asked "Do you think I did it?" and she replied "You know I do". However, as you say they could be talking about different things, but what?


> 5 - Saga saw Martin drop an empty coffee cup into a litter bin


More than that - she went back to retrieve it and presumably wouldn't have acted without confirmation that the coffee cup contained the poison.


More to the point, however, was that if Jens was indeed poisoned and it turned out to be the same liquid as was from the missing bottle from the evidence store, trying to find a way to unpin it from Martin is going to be impressive. The only other outcomes would be that either Jens wasn't poisoned (unlikely) or that his poisoning wasn't necessarily from the bottle and that Martin (or someone else) had taken it but for other means. Had Martin considered suicide after Mette rejected him, perhaps?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40914-the-bridge/#findComment-719434
Share on other sites

Not quite. Martin asked "Do you think I did it?" and she replied "You know I do". However, as you say they could be talking about different things, but what?


Which does not prove that Martin killed Jens just that Saga thinks he did. Martin did not confirm or deny.


> 5 - Saga saw Martin drop an empty coffee cup into a litter bin


More than that - she went back to retrieve it and presumably wouldn't have acted without confirmation that the coffee cup contained the poison.


Ah, but was there enough time to do the test? She took the coffee cup in the evening, went to see Martin's boss and shortly after arrested him. As yet, we do not know that the coffee cup contained poison. Previously Martin has left Jens with his coffee. Perhaps the coffee cup that Martin had and binned was simply Martin's coffee cup?


More to the point, however, was that if Jens was indeed poisoned and it turned out to be the same liquid as was from the missing bottle from the evidence store, trying to find a way to unpin it from Martin is going to be impressive. The only other outcomes would be that either Jens wasn't poisoned (unlikely) or that his poisoning wasn't necessarily from the bottle and that Martin (or someone else) had taken it but for other means. Had Martin considered suicide after Mette rejected him, perhaps?


We still have a shadowy bad guy who seems all powerful at the moment. Who is to say that he didn't organise it to disrupt the Martin/ Saga partnership? No more outlandish than any of the other bits of manipulation that he has undertaken.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40914-the-bridge/#findComment-719524
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Really don’t  know why people don’t sell their property by them selves…or at least start that way… not difficult if a freehold house, might be  more complicated if leasehold flat but with a good solicitor doing his work, should be fine. With many people using internet, plenty of people put  looking and numerous  other ways to reach target audience. Was a relocation agent for  years both in sales and letting through London and home  counties.. ie acquiring properties for individuals. Same goes for rental/ letting agents.. tenancy agreements are standard, totally agree that various laws governing terms  are updated but nowadays the majority of estate agents in letting and I assume sales  belong to a recognised body so really one can let oneself. Tenancies are free on line or can be purchased for a nominal sum. What do they do for their commission in both instances? Introduce tenant or buyer, in theory check out references and produce a tenancy agreement, agree amendments, sign by both parties, collect deposit and rent. Organise inventory check in and that is it. And then if you decide to pay them for management of property an additional fee in the hope that they will use approve contractors for all repairs in a suitable time frame for tenant. Was a post earlier or towards last year not sure on here or Facebook covering this point and lack of management from agent for months. I hasten to add that not all sales or rental agents behave in this manner but certainly some in good old ED. was definitely a posting about a well known agent in the village who was “slow” concerning the above. From memory, change if staff and just got buried…in my book totally unacceptable excuse. That is why they have managers in each estate agent to overseas and stay abreast of sales and lettings. Can’t pass the buck…and most companies irrespective of type of industry have a leaving policy and hand over policy produced normally by HR..Same could be said for consultants in  new build sales but normally they are  responsible and accountable from start to finish ie monitoring sale  the whole way, have to produce weekly reports to head office  plus  follow up on all enquiries. Been their as well over my career. 
    • Hello Could this be them   https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32711-pretty-fairy-lights-for-hire-perfect-for-partiesweddings/  
    • This is a seriously, seriously uber cool recommendation. Thank you!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...