Jump to content

Recommended Posts

People whistling in the street. To catch someone's attention. I always look round. Bloody irritating.


Brendan, you forgot the postcode in that address - oh, hang on a minute, folks in the country don't have postcodes on account of the fact that they don't have post offices.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Old people. On mobility scooters. In the road. Or

> on the pavement. Get. Out. Of. My. Way.

>

> Your Dad has made a noble decision for all of us

> PGC.


Ahhhh, there speaks the voice of youth. Personally I can't wait until I get myself a mobility scooter - I long to be able to stare down every one who dares to cross my path, with a "So? You gonna move or what".


My petty annoyance for this week? Restaurants that don't accept bookings because they are sooooo popular.

Weather forecasters who presume to describe the weather rather just inform me about it.

I was told on Friday that the weather over the weekend was 'not going to be good', presumably because it was going to be a bit chilly and windy. It's October so the information came as no surprise.

If there are any weather people reading this please remember, weather is not good, weather is not bad, weather just be.

People who stay in your bar for hours and hours on end, make a sh!tload of mess, click their fingers at you to order food/drinks, spend nearly ?300+, swan about ordering expensive drinks and buckets of chanpagne...





...and don't leave a single penny tip!!!



I hate our non-tipping culture!!!


But not everyone, I must add. To compensate we had a delightful group who not only tipped, actually behaved like civilised human beings, even after drinking us dry of all our red wine.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Invitations to join stupid bloody causes on

> facebook.

>

> "Join now to stop child abuse"

>

> Yeah, because if we all say it's really bad on

> facebook, then it's bound to stop! Perlease!



Another facebook related one is people that set their status to give cryptic messages about their emotions.....



John is feeling confused


Mandy is thinking should she or shouldn't she


Tarquin is wondering whether to suck it or lick it


You know the ones! COONTS!

Not sure this is petty, but don't know where else to write this.


Going on facebook, and stumbling across your best friend's (best man at your wedding and all that) girlfriend chatting openly to a mate of hers about their impending move to boro in a couple of months so they can have their baby up there and settle down. Then getting it confirmed by another mutual friend who seems to think it's old news.


Texting said friend, and getting absolutely no response because, as ever, they can't face up to anything!


Bit fecking annoying that one!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...