Jump to content

Recommended Posts

People who go to gigs to record the event onto their mobile phones.


For god's sake, go and see a band and join in with the experience etc, don't go merely to listen to it through your tinny sounding pc speakers when you get home.


You look really stupid and may get tennis elbow to boot.

dukesdenver Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ooh, KalamityKel, are you one of my colleagues???

> DO tell me how much milk is left at home and

> whether you think that bag of salad will last

> another day!

>

> :))


Dunno dukesdenver how'd u like ya sludge? :p



I'm slightly peeved with recruitment departments at the mo... Do I really need to receive 3 or 4 letters/emails saying the same thing or being harassed into completing applications by receiving phone calls by people who wont say who they are? AND all this from years ago! ::o

Receptionists at A&E who get your hopes up by telling you that you can expect to be seeing a doctor in just over an hour, when it's actually nearly 5 hours.


Giving false hope of being seen quickly to the injured is silly - better to say it's going to be a long wait and let people be pleasantly surprised if it turns out to be shorter.


Also, when you query the length of wait, telling you that you will be called through to cubicles soon, and not mentioning you'll then be left in cubicles without being seen for over an hour. (I'm sure that's a statistics dodge - get you into cubicles in under 4 hours means targets met, but no measurement made of wait time in cubicle...)


No prizes for guessing what I was doing last weekend!


But seriously, I would get fired if I treated my clients the way they treated me. It's not the length of wait - it's the poor communication. I know Friday night is a bad time to have a minor injury in A&E, but honesty is more appreciated than false hope.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Green Party policy on driver behaviour: Default 20mph Speed Limits: The party supports making 20 mph the default speed limit in all residential areas. 40mph Speed Limits: Proposing a default 40 mph speed limit in non-residential areas, excluding major roads. Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs): Promoting the expansion of LTNs to reduce "rat-running" in residential areas. Ending Internal Combustion Engine Sales: A target to end the sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles by 2030. Environmental Charging: Implementing a Carbon Tax on fossil fuels to increase the cost of petrol and diesel, incentivizing a shift to electric vehicles or public transport. Prioritizing Active Travel: Shifting funding from road building to walking, cycling, and public transport infrastructure, aiming for 50% of trips in towns and cities to be made by these methods by 2030. Improved Driver Training: Supporting "eco-driving" techniques to reduce emissions and fuel usage.  Some of which is good, some unrealistic, and on driver behaviour doesn't go far enough. Difficult to summarise the Lib Dems position as it is a bit wishy washy wanting to appeal to both the eco warrior and the NIMBY.  Sadly I know people who are both!
    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...