Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I cannot stand people that park in parent and child bays. It's just pure selfishness. I have 2 very small kids. The parking bays are not always free-I frequently wait 5/10 minutes for one. I'm terrified my lo will run out in front of a car while I'm in the car park as a driver just wouldn't see my toddler as she is very little. With two one has to come out of the car at a time. Drivers expect kids near the parent and child bays. It's also closer to the door reducing the risk of a child being hit as they have physically less distance to walk to the door. It's not merely a convenience to people with kids it's also a safety issue. Walking from the rear of the park is literally multiple road crossings. When I was 9 months pregnant I had no choice but to park in a ' normal' bay as all the parent and child bays were taken and I was in a rush. When I caMe out some considerate transit van driver had parked right up against the driver door (in my space). I asked them to call him over the tannoy, and still waited 20 mins for him to come out. I physically could not get me or my lo into the car owing to my size. Seriously, you don't know how stressful shopping with kids is-I hate it which is why I only go for essentials (have most groceries delivered). Do the decent thing and park on one of the hundreds of other normal spaces.

Buddug, are you the fat bloke that (when I asked where his kids were) claimed he had to park close to the door because his weight made it too difficult to walk any further?


I've got kids but don't use those parks now that they're a bit older, we park near the recycling in the "comfort" parks which give a bit more space and walk, no big deal. Although generally I shop online, would rather pay a delivery charge than push a shopping trolley round a crowded supermarket for an hour. For parents with small babies or really young kids they're easier and safer, as pointed out before.


FWIW, they are usually full during the day, so are well used. It's the disabled ones that generally sit empty. 14 parks out of hundreds is not too many.

FIRST WORLD PROBLEM - 'Long standing customer' parks where they are not meant to; warned not to; ignores that; gets a ticket; and then is let off and still comes on the EDF and acts hard done by??? Is this a colossal wind up or actually the most pathetic thread ever on here? (and, boy that takes some doing)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FIRST WORLD PROBLEM - 'Long standing customer' parks where they are not meant to; warned not to;

> ignores that; gets a ticket; and then is let off and still comes on the EDF and acts hard done

> by??? Is this a colossal wind up or actually the most pathetic thread ever on here? (and, boy that

> takes some doing)


To be fair, having to provide special parking places so people can get their fat kids out of their too-big cars was a first-world solution to a first world-problem in the first place.

Loz you're a bit ignorant. My daughter is 9th centile in weight and I drive a very old fiesta. But legally required baby seats are large, and require the doors to be opened wide to get them in and out of the cars. With all those terrible parking skills out there it literally becomes impossible to get the Los in/out of the car in a regular bay if the neighbouring car has not parked properly.


Ps we were all kids once and all had carers, so cut those that do the childminding some slack

Wow, a whole 14 parent and child parking spaces out of a car park of what, 1,000 spaces and you couldn't find a space, that makes it all right.

Plus you are supported by Louisa who in another thread thinks putting a bin in a parking space is acceptable, where are the morals now?

Cheap shot DirtyBox. Anyhow, what's morality got to do with it? A large supermarket chain has a private car park to attract more customers to spend money in its store, don't see how me pointing out a fact to the OP about the legality of a private car parking fine is in any sense immoral. It bares no resemblance at all to my situation. Totally unrelated.


Louisa.

Ok, I'll make it simple, there's a tiny number of spaces to make some peoples lives a little easier - a bit more room to get a child out the car for example - and the op has come along and thought "oooo, the nearest space is all of 100m away, I'll just park here", then they have been told they can't but they thought "f**k you, I'll do what I want" and now they are complaining they got a "ticket", enforceable or not. So basically the OP is a total and utter w*nker.

DirtyBox, unless I am mistaken, the OP claimed all the other spaces had been taken and they resorted to taking one of the 'parent & child' spaces. As I stated, rules are rules, probably not a good idea to do this, but if the rest of what they claim is true then I personally see no reason why someone who is spending money in a supermarket cannot take their chances and just do it anyway, because, it is private property, not a public road, and any action they take regarding illegal parking is not enforceable by law. The manager let them get away with it, storm in a teacup mountain out of a molehill etc.


Louisa.

buddug Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sainsbury's does seem to be clamping down now on those of us who

> are sad singles not blessed with children.


If it's any consolation, when my kids are really acting up, I sometimes think I'd prefer to be single and childless.


But "sad and single" were your choice of words. 'Nuf said!

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DirtyBox, unless I am mistaken, the OP claimed all

> the other spaces had been taken and they resorted

> to taking one of the 'parent & child' spaces.


Nope, check the original post, you are mistaken. There were 'hardly any spaces' - not no other spaces. If there'd been none at all then I'd have backed the OP.


What now?

In my experience the parent and child spaces are at a premium and occupied all the time (except at unsociable hours when the rest of the car park is empty too) so I find it hard to believe that the rest of the car park was full except this space, so as I have already said the OP is a total w*nker!


There are rules in our society (things like not dropping litter, not taking a p*ss in the street, being polite to people, joining a queue at the back, etc), lose these and then it's a free for all and it's all going to go to pot

Wow! I can't believe they revoked the charge. You were out of order, and rude. And lazy! Just park a bit further away and walk! I had someone dent the side of my van recently in that car park, maybe it was a parent with kids not being able to park in one of those bays because of someone like you. And you feel hard done by? Are you for real?!

Ha ha Pickle, you caught me out there! But I forgave them for the eggs and avocado debacle. And no, I'm not the "fat bloke" (that's not very kind, though, is it, to overweight people).


Dirty box: you live up to your name: "So basically the OP is a total and utter w*nker." Not once, but twice. Honestly!


Strafer Jack: Hi there! I know you're a parent, so I understand why you feel strongly about this, but I did write: "I do think it's good to have parent and child bays nearer to the entrance though, so parents don't have to struggle so much." So I'm not a completely lost cause! And it was a good truce, although also, I think, more an acceptance that despite the fact we will not always see eye to eye, we are both still quite decent human beings when all's said and done. Unlike many here today who have resorted to personal insult bordering on hatred. Over what, an opinion. The ED forum is a microcosm of the world...


And Shaunag: It's interesting to hear your take on the safety aspect. To be honest, I'm always nervous when reversing out of any bay of running a little one over. I shall think about this.


Do you know what, I think I'm just extremely anti-authoritarian. Most of the time I wouldn't park in parent/child bays and never in disabled bays - but that's not obeying authority, it's simply being courteous. My gripe, really, is that I don't think this should be enforced via ?60 fines. If you spend so much money in a shop and are a loyal customer the last thing on their mind should be fining you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...