Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Oh, that's reminded me of someone I used to know

> named her daughter Brie. Yes, that's right, after

> the cheese.


If you were out and picked up ladies called Brie and Chardonnay you could have the best wine and cheese night ever.

I have a friend who sublet a room off a couple with a daughter. They introduced their daughter to her 'and this is Chanel. Well, we spell it with two n's though so it's a bit different, you know' My friend politely asked 'what you mean channel?!!!' Nope they corrected her with a strange look. Chanel. Two n's

She didn't end up living there long..

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bree is an Irish name- maybe people hear these

> names and like them and call their children them

> without checking the correct spellings.



Is it really! Never heard it myself

Back in Portsmouth I knew a couple called John and Dawn Cockhead! Now, presuming they weren't brother and sister, this means that she voluntarily took this name!


Oh, and I am currently working with a client called Bollocko!


A friend of mine once had a customer called Victoria Kunto!


Have to say though, so e people on this thread come across a bit snobby!

Bree is not an unusual name in Australia (or the bit I come from anyway) - shortened from Gabrielle. I know three Brees.


I knew an Ix once, pronounced "Ish". I suspect he may have made it up himself though.


Animal names seem popular at the moment- I've encountered a Tiger, a Bear and a Fox recently.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> True story

>

> A friend of a friend's mother was Terry (Monty

> Python) Jones's cleaner. She had two boys called

> Genghis and Adolf.

>

> I kid you not.

>

> Terry had the family round one afternoon and made

> the boys some food. My pal says his abiding memory

> is of Terry standing on the back door step

> shouting "Genghis! Adolf! Pizza."

>

> I can't tell you their surname because I think

> they still live around here but that was daft as

> well


You win this thread.

Strange hormones and chemicals must fly around when you're a couple expecting a new baby


I was very much in favour (for a mental but short time) of naming my yougest son "Ike" . I know, what a thing to do to the poor boy. My wife thankfully put her foot down and traded me her name for a girl, which I wasn't in favour of to say the least "Nubie"

charlesfare Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I was in crystal Palace park, there were two

> > ladies together, the tattooed Fred Perry

> wearing

> > skin headed one of the pair bellowed (in the

> very

> > finest sarf london tambre) toward a golden

> haired

> > angel of a child

> >

> > "CHARDONNAAAAAAAAY WE'RE GOIN' NAW"

> >

> > It was exquisite

>

> Is this a joke or are you Katie Hopkins or

> something?



It's pretty clear from above that silly names aren't just confined to one social class (whatever that means nowadays)...they can be found anywhere. Surely the challenge for parents must be to strike that delicate balance between tacky and boring, reference any significant relatives and be "cool" at the same time. Not easy.


There's been a spate of Dylans recently but if I ever drop a boy I shall be calling him "Hendrix II". Is that acceptable?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...