Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've posted this before, but I rather liked it, an open letter to hipsters

http://potlatch.typepad.com/weblog/2011/03/an-open-letter-to-the-hipsters.html


If I were to tell you, my dear hipster, that you represent a post-liberal youth movement, you probably wouldn't have a clue what I meant. You have probably never met anyone who wasn't a liberal. You have scarcely heard of The Daily Mail, for which I envy you. Your idea of a conservative is someone who suggests you wear a bicycle helmet. Your boss doesn't even notice your tatoos, which must register as something of a shame. You are so liberal as to not even know it. So what is it you yearn for? What is your equivalent of the 1960s?



Some have suggested it is the 1950s, which is maybe true to the point of adopting various Beat styles and poses. But really, I suggest, it is the post-punk period of circa 1977-84, the years between The Sex Pistols ripping up the rule book, and The Smiths piecing it back together again. And let me go one further, with a proposition that might (or might not) offend some of you: what you yearn for is the fulfillment of the promises of Thatcherism. What frustrates you about Britain (and, for your American progenitors, New York and California) in the early 21st century is the gap between the rhetoric and the reality of economic freedom. You have been seeking to renew economic liberalism, just as baggy and rave renewed social liberalism.

Apparently they shun the mainstream, so will wear things that aren't fashionable, thus making them instantly fashionable because as you say "being anti-fashion is so fashionable".


It's like music when people won't listen to something because it's too mainstream, so they listen to "underground stuff" which if it's any good, gets popular and mainstream, at which point it shall be cast aside as a "sell out".

Okay far too sweeping a statement, of course not everything good ends up being picked up and has mainstream sucess, but the gist of what I'm saying remains the same. Some people won't listen to stuff simply because it's mainstream. They ignore the fact that sometimes stuff is popular and mainstream because it's really good. But it's all about being cool and listening to the "right" stuff.

I have to say I quite enjoyed the whole 'chap' thing when it kicked off, what, 10, 15 years ago? Drinking gin and being silly.

It does become somewhat unnerving when it becomes a uniform to follow slavishly, i always found that sort of thing disturbing to be fair.


The closest I've ever got to that is probably a penchant for over-sized wolly jumpers when i was 17, a useful cultural badge when attempting to drunkenly paw at cute goth girls down the local pub.

There's an older and more monied 'look' going on too, it's going on in the shadow of Hipsterisms bright light. But it's there


Daddy Rockabilly old motor bike/car driving vintage Hipster is my take


Known to feature:

Redwing boots

Selve edge & Japanese denim

Beards

Vintage work wear

Supreme T's

New English work wear, but old cuts

Blue, Kahki, Olive, Denim

Hair/no hair

Tattoos (old and optional)

Specs



Or is this just urbane arty/creative middle agers, flush with ?150 to splash on a pair of said jeans + ?250 on a pair of boots

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carnell is also completely vindicated in sporting

> what might at first glance appear to be hipsterish

> cultural identifiers.

> He has of course been wearing them entirely free

> of irony since he could walk!!!



Guilty m'lud.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's an older and more monied 'look' going on

> too, it's going on in the shadow of Hipsterisms

> bright light. But it's there

>

> Daddy Rockabilly old motor bike/car driving

> vintage Hipster is my take

>

> Known to feature:

> Redwing boots

> Selve edge & Japanese denim

> Beards

> Vintage work wear

> Supreme T's

> New English work wear, but old cuts

> Blue, Kahki, Olive, Denim

> Hair/no hair

> Tattoos (old and optional)

> Specs

>

>

> Or is this just urbane arty/creative middle agers,

> flush with ?150 to splash on a pair of said jeans

> + ?250 on a pair of boots


Ah man....caught again (sans beard and tats).....I'm just going to live in a potato sack and be done with it.


Heirloom organic potatoes obviously.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carnell is also completely vindicated in sporting

> what might at first glance appear to be hipsterish

> cultural identifiers.

> He has of course been wearing them entirely free

> of irony since he could walk!!!



Absolutely, but the difference is that Carnell doesn't look like he's playing dress up.

There's a fine line between dressing and dressing up, I agree. That includes haircuts and beards etc.


Sometimes I see a gent, usually older and near the city, dressed in the most immaculate tailored clothes. It's a great sight and the details are subtle


But add a cygnet ring and white cuff and collar on a coloured shirt, and were into spiv territory


I'm sure DC is a fine dresser indeed, not a cygnet ring in sight

Too bloody right.


Don't really have the finances for the Row so tends to be vintage - either tweedy-country stuff or American workwear.


Trying hard not to cross the fine line into playing dress-up as Bertie Wooster during the week and a lumberjack from Wisconsin on weekends!

You've no idea how close you are.


If I tell you I ride this:


http://www.velorbiscycles.co.uk/student-classic


While wearing this:


http://www.helt-pro.com/en/products/Detail/hunter-loden.html


You being to get the idea. And while Universal Works stuff is ok, I prefer http://www.old-town.co.uk/products.htm for English workwear.

This thread was done in 2011....http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,804059,804822#msg-804822


One thing I do like about hipster style is that it's one of the most identifiable stylings of any tribe since heavy metal, punk and teddy boys. If it makes people talk then it's probably a good thing. We cant all be seen in John Lewis Gant sweaters and corduroy. Unless you're the proto-hipster Carnell of course.


I broadly admire the micro-capitalist entrepreneurialism. You could argue the movement has single handedly regenerated the inner urban retail and food scene for the better.


Agree there's a particular type who are annoying....but aren't we all to a certain extent?

Hasn't every generation since the enlightenment or whatever had their own version of hipsters? Pre-Raphaelites, flappers, beatniks, teddy boys, new romantics and so on. Some of the posters here are probably old enough to have lived through or been part of at least one of those sub-cultures or some other.


Funny to see people on the ED turn their nose up at today's current crop of bearded, skinny jeans and art school "hipsters" - it's partly down to that class of young people that the values of your houses have shot up so quickly and that coffee shops, art house cinemas, spangly new eateries and the likes are popping up around here. On the other hand, that could be all the more reason to hate them.

Gore Vidal wrote in 1953 of the "Young men with beards wearing blue jeans and open red-checked shirts contrived to look more Iowa than Murger..."


I suspect it's the contrivance that gets people's goats, but I can't help feeling it's kind of pathetic to rail against people half your age (or a third your age...!) on account of what they wear. You sound like my dad when I was 14 and he ridiculed my latest outfit from Afflecks Palace or when I put the Smiths on my record player. Get with it, daddy-o.


Why are espadrilles more offensive to you than box fresh white trainers or nasty short sleeved shirts? There are tribes aplenty in London, and I find it utterly bemusing that art students raise more ire from the impeccably dressed style mavens of the forum than any other fashion gang.


As I thought when I was 14, so I think now - if someone who clearly couldn't give a stuff about their own clothes thinks you're getting dressed wrong, (and what manner of projection is that?) you must be doing something right.


And Otta - "apparently they...", "some people..."? For shame, man!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But what are you basing that judgement on? Vibes? where exactly and under what council is money being spent wisely? what about parties which promise to cut waste, come to power and find out there is no waste?   
    • I've just had James from Trelco round doing taps and hot water.  Prompt, efficient and pleasant people and the cost came in under what we thought it would be! Will definitely use them again.
    • Yes - adult care is a large part of the CT bill.  That does not mean the council spend our money well or wisely.        
    • “What do councils spend all the money on?” Is, in my view, one of the most profoundly emblematic of our times  we go about our lives, backed up by councils and governments and complain they aren’t needed  reform win elections based on “we’re gonna go in and slash all the waste!” Only to later admit there effectively isn’t any oh and by the way we need to increase council tax   Now all we have to offer is racism and ineptitude sorry about that  https://www.gbnews.com/money/reform-elon-musk-doge-failed-savings So where does the money go? On a multitude of services - but the increasingly aged population and the care provision required is a large part of it  the government could give councils more money to avoid council tax rises  - but the we would have to pay more in jewels taxation  and as a country we tend to pay less than other similar countries  so we end up with an expensive mend and make do approach  I don’t see any political parties offering a solution   Starmer is obviously lacking in many areas but he is the result of a hostile media and a reluctant population willing to hear truths  (wait until we hear how much we will need to increase defence spending by in the coming years) If a party stopped pretending all the money was wasted but published a list of costs, projections and proposals that wasn’t gutted to suit the landscape of needing to not bemonstered by the press or deemed too expensive by voters I would be very interested      can’t see that happening tho  (also worth reminding ourselves of all the brexiters who said things like “I don’t care how much it costs   I don’t care if I lose my job  it’s about taking back control!” And yet now we find them complaining about increasing costs. As they always will complain about everything  because it’s always someone else’s fault)   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...