Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't forget (pretty decent) pizzas at the Actress too.


Of all the things we need more of, pizza is almost bottom of the list. A halfway decent Vietnamese place would do a roaring trade, ditto Japanese, Spanish, Mexican. A good Chinese/dim sum place would probably do well.


Also continually amazed that none of the curry house owners have the initiative to reinvent themselves with regional/"home cooking" type food, ditch the tikka massala and double the profits. There must be a practically endless supply of Indian people in London who know how to cook amazing food.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44227-franco-manca/#findComment-746343
Share on other sites

holloway Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i think that any pub recommended for its pizzas

> should be avoided like the plague.

> pizzas should not be served in pubs. fact.


Pizzas should not be made of sourdough either in my opinion, but then I prefer the thin crust Italian wood-fired classics rather than the American versions that dominate here.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44227-franco-manca/#findComment-746488
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know Fox... it's a paradox. I guess because many

> pubs are tied, and therefore forced to pay

> extortionate prices for drinks. Restaurants, on

> the other hand, can buy drinks at wholesale price.



And charge a bit more for them.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44227-franco-manca/#findComment-746493
Share on other sites

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pizzas should not be made of sourdough either in

> my opinion, but then I prefer the thin crust

> Italian wood-fired classics rather than the

> American versions that dominate here.


Are you sure about that? I thought that sourdough was the traditional Naples style.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44227-franco-manca/#findComment-746502
Share on other sites

Neopolitan pizzas are protected under EU rules similar to french cheeses/wines as to ingredients and process. They do use a particular yeast but I've never seen them referred to as sourdough (a later American term?) and fermentation of the yeast bacteria (the main distinction with sourdough) does not appear to be particularly relevant to the process.


I could be wrong though and due to the taste imparted by the yeast it could fall under a loose description of sourdough

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44227-franco-manca/#findComment-746535
Share on other sites

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really? Why on earth not?

>

> They are perfect pub food. Quick. Can be eaten

> with hands. Salty. Savoury. Maybe a bit of chilli

> heat.

>

> All encourages the punter to have another brewski.

> Perfect.




DC is spot on here IMO. I'm not someone that enjoys eating out in restraunts or pubs, I'm just not very foody, but sometimes you need something to keep the engine running (and soak up the booze), and pizza is ideal in those circumstances, for all the reasons DC gives, and the additional bonus that you can share one with a mate and split the cost.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44227-franco-manca/#findComment-746782
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...