Jump to content

Recommended Posts

AcedOut Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Topics have gone!? I bought one only a few weeks

> ago...



Yes.


Although feel free to prove me wrong. By giving me one. Only then will I accept defeat.


It does have the crappest name of any chocolate bar ever, doesn't it?

What a great thread, thank you microbite.


I'm all about the dipping of delicious confectionary and baked items in tasty drinks, as some of you already know. And for me a simple KitKat dipped in tea is a wondrous thing.


However, Wispas are also very nice, and I hope to re-aquaint myself with them soon.

Wispa gold, (does extremely good impression of Homer Simpson's drooling noise, sorry don't know how to spell that one!)

have the most exquisite very soft caramel/soft toffee? bit added to them, it all just adds to the delectable mouth watering velvety chocolate......

Wispa Gold was excellent, but soooo sweet it made your teeth cry. Wasn't there some evil Wispa mint too? AN experiment too far in my opinion.


Once bought a "special edition" Kit Kat Caramac. Kit Kat: good, Caramac: good, Kit Kat Caramac: Not so good.


What is the king of the "special edition" chocolate bar?

http://galleries.thelondonpaper.com/viral-rude-chocolate-bar-mash-ups/images/07.jpg


http://galleries.thelondonpaper.com/viral-rude-chocolate-bar-mash-ups/images/10.jpg


http://galleries.thelondonpaper.com/viral-rude-chocolate-bar-mash-ups/images/06.jpg


http://galleries.thelondonpaper.com/viral-rude-chocolate-bar-mash-ups/images/01.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...