Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Woolies has been hopelessly out of date for over a decade now.

It even looked out of date 20+ years ago when i was sweet-stealing teen.


Out of date electricals in faded boxes, a wallful of irrelevant music CDs, aisles of kitchen tat.. Everything you can find everywhere else, only a poorer selection and slightly more expensive.


It had to go.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4648-woolies-rip/#findComment-149743
Share on other sites

And what about that rugby song?


#My father's a lavatory cleaner

His pay is a two shilling bit

And when he comes home in the evening

He doesn't half smell of the....


Shine up your buttons with Shine-o

It's only three ha'pence a tin

You can buy it or nick in Woolworths

But I don't think they've got any in#


Getting quite tearful now.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4648-woolies-rip/#findComment-149764
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just heard Theo Paphitis (a man of consummate

> taste) say on the radio, that he has a sneaking

> suspicion that Woolies will survive in some form

> or other. Huzzah!


Actually, I can sort of see were he is coming from. I seem to remember Woolies being on the verge of bankruptcy about 20 years or more - and they just seemed to re-vamp themselves etc.,


That was back in the days when they sold seemingly EVERYTHING. I seem to remember reading that they did an audit and found something like 4 miles of green sewing cotton.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4648-woolies-rip/#findComment-149768
Share on other sites

I used to work there in the 80s. Hated the place and rarely ever go in, pretty much like everyone else it seems.


It was decline then, gradually thinning its what it sells, until it resembled every other Pound Shop in the street.


It just felt like they didn't really care or any enthusiasm for what they did.


The only thing I liked is looking through the cheap dvds to pick up bargins like Xanadu for a couple of pounds.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4648-woolies-rip/#findComment-149853
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...