Jump to content

Recommended Posts

capt_birdseye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Read my first ever Harlen Coben last week which I

> picked up at the Book Swap. Terribly written,

> outrageous plot, unsympathetic characters, and a

> real page-turner. Bit of a guilty pleasure!


Exactly, they're bloody great!!! >:D<

Some of his are better than others (I've read most I think), but basically the plots will involve someone who died or went missing ages ago seeming to kind of turn up again.


I should mention Tony Parsons' "stories we could tell", really really enjoyed it. It was set a year before I was born, but I could still relate totally to the characters, and enjoyed the nostalgia. Jah I'll give it to you next time I see you, basically the main characters are about the age you would have been the year it was set. Would be interested to see if you think it rings true or not.


Have just started the second adventure of Captain Alatriste "Purity of Blood" by Arturo Perez-Reverte having read the first one sometime last year. They're really nicely written books set in early 17th century Spain, and offer quite a bit of interesting history around the fictional story. Apparently the author (a war reporter) was disgusted by the lack of 17th century history in his daughter's school text books, he decided to write about the era.

  • 3 weeks later...

Finished Caro Fraser's The Pupil earlier this week. The hero comes from East Dulwich and at one point says:


'Piers,' he said. Piers looked at him enquiringly. 'As we say in East Dulwich, Piers,' continued Anthony in a quiet, conversational tone, 'why don't you fuck off?'


Also read Rebecca for the book club - quite a gothic romp.


Have started White Teeth which I enjoy for short periods but can't settle down to a long read with it.


As a little aside, have started reading Alexander McCall Smith's online book, Corduroy Mansions, which is here if you fancy it: C. Mansions


My guilty read this week is Deathly Hallows for the umpteenth time.

I'm reading Karoo by Steve Tesich. I like it a lot. It trips you up - one minute you can't believe how vile the characters are and you're enjoying a rather biting satire on LA life; the next a single sentence will beautifully demonstrate how f**king hard it is to be human.

Even sadder that its author (who wrote the screenplay The World According to Garp) died of a heart attack shortly after completing it.

started a new one over the weekend, called "sister kate:nursing through the troubles". its basically the memories of sister kate o,hanlon who was the head sister of the royal victoria hospital, a&e dept, belfast at the height of the troubles. talk about an eye opener. highly recommended.

if you like kate atkinson, you might enjoy her brilliant play called "Abandonment". it's in a similar vein to emotionally weird (and behind the scenes at the museum, her other well-known one) but sometimes reading plays is a nice departure from novels (& mags and rags)


btw, i have just finished "The Year of Magical Thinking" by Joan Didion, which was excellent. it deals primarily with grief, though, and not for the faint-hearted. i swear i could have filled the tub with my geyser of tears.

Ah shoshntosh.... I don't often see mentions of Abandonment - did you see it on stage? I saw it up in Edinburgh (gosh that'll be about eight years ago now) and it was pretty awful..... maybe it was the production.

But I agree reading plays can sometimes be great - Owen McCafferty's monologues (published alongside his play Mojo Mickybo if I remember righty) are beautiful. And I remember debbie tucker green's Born Bad being an incredibe read.

Also just wondering if anybody out there is feeling anxious about the new film version of Brideshead Revisited? One of my favourite books of all time .... I'm feeling terribly protective of it!


(the lead actor playing Charles does look rather dishy though!)

rather agree with you about Brideshead, but have what I feel MUST be larger concerns.


OMG!!!


Have you heard [spit] Knightley is going to be allowed to mangle Eliza Doolittle in a new My Fair Lady? I'm so upset. And it's definitely not just the yoghurt talking.

**Waves at Moos** Hello!



Mmmm, I don't know about Keira - sometime when I see her interviewed there is a playfulness that could serve Eliza rather well...I haven't seen many of her films to comment on her acting.


Equus is a great play. I saw the recent production and it was pretty solid - but maybe a little too polished - I saw a production at university which in its scruffy, low-budget way, somehow touched me far more.

I don't know, something about her sharp teeth bothers me.


Back to Brideshead, didn't you think Sebastian's eventual fate was extraordinarily cruel, although so well plotted that it could only be seen as inevitable? Breaks my heart just thinking about it.


I'm currently reading Sebastian Faulks' The Fatal Englishman, which is fascinating - thanks to whomever donated it to the ED book swap.

  • 1 month later...

I finished No Highway by Neville Shute in the wee, small hours of this morning. Very nicely written and with splashes of humour, slightly frothy in places but not in a yukky way.


[i have it in mind for Mamora Man at the next book swap]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...