Jump to content

Foxtons Branch in East Dulwich will be M&S... (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

The demise of the "****aquarium" is a great loss to the community as we all know,

but we shall grit our teeth, and maintain the WW2 fighting spirit, and soldier on undaunted.


I wonder how long M&S will survive?


Anyhoo it can only be described as a victory for ED.

Welcome to the fourm Engels! Or may we call you Friedrich? Bah, Engles - my mistake :(


I highly recommend a search on M&S in ED on the forum - there is plenty of evidence that 70% of first time posters are drawn to the forum on the strength of an M&S rumour!


This one has the ring of truth about it though - wherein do you source your cunning insights? ;-)

I'd rather have a Waitrose than a Simply Food. :-$ Just don't get the appeal of most M&S stodge - their jubilee strawberries and their sweet potato/lentil salad (both of which are only available in the summer) are the best things in it. And I really object to paying 10p an item more in a Simply Food as a 'convenience' charge. Small 'convenience' shops used to charge more because they didn't have the economies of scale that supermarkets had. Now most of them are run by the giants but still charge more. :X

Foxtons are in so much debt they will indeed be closing offices. They offered the company back to the original founder for ?1, but he turned them down due to their heavy debt.


However, I feel for the staff - it is a tough time and not nice for anyone to lose their job.

Engles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By the way I thought Lordship lane was

> meant to be independents anyway, not chains.

> Why was Foxton's allowed to open there in the first place?


Perhaps you should visit LL, Engles. You'll see betting shops, off-licences, estate agents (not just Foxton's), supermarkets, cafes, chemists, clothes shops and undertakers - all chains...

It's possible that a judge could have made an out of hours administration order or that the directors went down the out of court admin route over the weekend, but I am fairly clear that Foxtons wasn't in administration as of Friday. As soon as an admin order is made, there are various notification requirements to the Court, creditors and interested parties - without going into details, I and my colleagues would have been made aware of it.


Oh, and once in admin, the company doesn't have a say about what steps it may or may not take in respect of the business like closing down branches - those decisions are taken by the adminstrators, who wouldn't have made any decisions at this early stage before taking an audit of the business - the initial audit would normally take about 5-10 days depending on the size of the job and how good the records are.


Great first post though...


Edited to say, it's entirely possible that the company may have called in restructuring advisors to consider options internally - perhaps to come up with a plan to restructure the business without going into an insolvency process like administration. That would be very normal, but not quite the same things as an administrator being appointed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...