Jump to content

Foxtons Branch in East Dulwich will be M&S... (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

The demise of the "****aquarium" is a great loss to the community as we all know,

but we shall grit our teeth, and maintain the WW2 fighting spirit, and soldier on undaunted.


I wonder how long M&S will survive?


Anyhoo it can only be described as a victory for ED.

Welcome to the fourm Engels! Or may we call you Friedrich? Bah, Engles - my mistake :(


I highly recommend a search on M&S in ED on the forum - there is plenty of evidence that 70% of first time posters are drawn to the forum on the strength of an M&S rumour!


This one has the ring of truth about it though - wherein do you source your cunning insights? ;-)

I'd rather have a Waitrose than a Simply Food. :-$ Just don't get the appeal of most M&S stodge - their jubilee strawberries and their sweet potato/lentil salad (both of which are only available in the summer) are the best things in it. And I really object to paying 10p an item more in a Simply Food as a 'convenience' charge. Small 'convenience' shops used to charge more because they didn't have the economies of scale that supermarkets had. Now most of them are run by the giants but still charge more. :X

Foxtons are in so much debt they will indeed be closing offices. They offered the company back to the original founder for ?1, but he turned them down due to their heavy debt.


However, I feel for the staff - it is a tough time and not nice for anyone to lose their job.

Engles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By the way I thought Lordship lane was

> meant to be independents anyway, not chains.

> Why was Foxton's allowed to open there in the first place?


Perhaps you should visit LL, Engles. You'll see betting shops, off-licences, estate agents (not just Foxton's), supermarkets, cafes, chemists, clothes shops and undertakers - all chains...

It's possible that a judge could have made an out of hours administration order or that the directors went down the out of court admin route over the weekend, but I am fairly clear that Foxtons wasn't in administration as of Friday. As soon as an admin order is made, there are various notification requirements to the Court, creditors and interested parties - without going into details, I and my colleagues would have been made aware of it.


Oh, and once in admin, the company doesn't have a say about what steps it may or may not take in respect of the business like closing down branches - those decisions are taken by the adminstrators, who wouldn't have made any decisions at this early stage before taking an audit of the business - the initial audit would normally take about 5-10 days depending on the size of the job and how good the records are.


Great first post though...


Edited to say, it's entirely possible that the company may have called in restructuring advisors to consider options internally - perhaps to come up with a plan to restructure the business without going into an insolvency process like administration. That would be very normal, but not quite the same things as an administrator being appointed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
    • Do great pizzas there at community cafe.. lots going on — was free parking but plans  to like everywhere get folk to pay.  Nice area… only discovered it a few years ago..   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...