Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jimbob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if anyone is thinking of getting gary glitter

> anything for xmas, see the above post for

> inspiration.


Seriously, JimBob I'd keep it quiet about wanting to buy a present for Gary Glitter.

It tends to be controversial, no matter which way you go.

But drag the Bunty annual into it, and you enter a minefield.

Let it lie, is my advice.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Bunty Annual.

>

> Are you sure? If it featured any adventures of The

> Four Marys, then have a care, for you toy with my

> juvenile sexuality.

> Which Mary? Cotter? Raleigh? I couldn't make my

> mind up.

> Probably bacause on the back cover of each 'Bunty'

> there was Bunty, disporting herself in her

> underwear.

> Distracting me from the wholesomeness of the the

> Marys, and enticing me into the whole 'cutting out

> the Bunty figure, the clothes, ensuring you

> include the 'tabs' so that you can press them over

> Bunty's compliant body'

> Think again, Sue.


xxxxxx


:))

Tried and failed "The Simillarion" and "War and Peace".


Took several weeks to force myself through "The Brothers Karamazov"


But the worst one has to be a book by Marion Keynes that was so dreadful that I can't even remember what it was called - my brain has blanked it out to save me from embarrassment.

I remember a friend giving me a book to take on holiday... John O'Farrell's A Best a Man Can Get - omigod! A long time ago I had read his memoir Things Can Only Get Better and enjoyed it so thought he could at least write. But it was hellish.... chick lit written from a male perspective, full of "witty" but ultimately mundane observations.
A long time ago (I was a teenager) a read Lord of the Rings. When I started to read it I hadn't understood that it stretched to 3 volumes so I just bought the one book. As I was nearing the end of volume 1, maybe 15-20 pages from the end, I remember having a little flick through to the back page and thinking to myself (I kid you not); "he's got a lot of loose ends to tie up in the next few pages". Bless.

On Chesil Beach by Ian McEwan


don't know what happened here, normally such a good writer, it was SO bad that I thought he might written it as some strange kind of joke, or to see what the critics said (to see if they fell for it... Emperor's Clothes syndrome, etc)

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On Chesil Beach by Ian McEwan

>

> don't know what happened here, normally such a

> good writer, it was SO bad that I thought he might

> written it as some strange kind of joke, or to see

> what the critics said (to see if they fell for

> it... Emperor's Clothes syndrome, etc)


Ah, that is the only one of his I have read - I did feel distinctly underwhelmed and didn't intend to read any others by him, but perhaps that is too hasty a decision.

Another eye closer was the poems of Robert Frost (I think that was the boring Yank poet's name) which I had to read for my English Lit O'Level.


We did Merchant of Venice and Lord of the Flies too - but I loved them!! Eng Lit's equivallent of slasher films!


Also with Hardy I hated the whole weak stupid female crap. I would have preferred the heroine (can't remember what book it was - is there one with a woman called Bessy?) to stick a pitchfork through the rich abusuer dude's throat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
    • They’re convenient. They’re fun to ride. From ED, getting a Lime to Brixton and then jumping on the tube is probably the fastest way to get into central London. There’s a reason they’re  popular.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...