Jump to content

Ulrika Jonsson

MrBen

By MrBen
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

MrBen

MrBen

Posted
Posted

I'm not a big Big Brother fan. And please forgive me this thread. But I flicked on C4 tonight hoping to see the super Swede stunner I fondly recalled from my student days. And got a bit of a shock.


Yes it's ten years later. And we all age. Hey thats cool. And looks beauty is skin deep anyways etc. And I was hoping for some graceful wrinkles.But has anyone else noticed there is something really weird about her face now? I think its the cheeks...but can't put my finger on it - can anyone else?


And while I'm at it, what about La Toya Jacksons nose? She is looking like ET with long hair. Or her brother Michael. Is this all plastic surgery in action? Whats wrong with ageing gracefully?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4856-ulrika-jonsson/
Share on other sites
bignumber5

bignumber5

Posted
Posted

zephyr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ulrika - I think she has been Botoxed (sp?).


Quite the reverse - mrs.number5 and I settled on the single adjective of "jowly"



DISCLAIMER: MR & MRS NUMBER5 ARE NOT, NOR WILL THEY EVER BE, WATCHING CELEBRITY BB. TUNING IN TO THE LAST 5 MINUTES OF THE OPENING SHOW TO SEE WHO'S IN JUST OUT OF PATRONISING CURIOSITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE WATCHING. THANK YOU.

Tony.London Suburbs

Tony.London Suburbs

Posted
Posted

So what nonenties did you notice in there BN during your 5 minutes worth?

The Ladyfriend I'm visiting tonight likes nothing better than seeing many people she does not know or will ever meet chat pointlessly about nothing at all so I'd better prepare myself(!)

Keef

Keef

Posted
Posted
If you saw Ulrika on Shooting Stars last week you would have really had a shock. All panda eyed make-up and epitomising the look of the old trollop she is.


Really harsh man!


I watched Shooting Stars last night (recorded it), and thought she looked pretty good at 41. I also don't know why she has such a bad rep as a tart, what did she do that was so bad?


So she has kids by different dads, so fecking what?!?

Keef

Keef

Posted
Posted

But how does that make her different from nearly any other celeb, or person you could mention? Everone loves little Kylie, and she's had a fair few fellas.


Chat to your average 41 year old woman (or man for that matter), and the majority of them (especially ones that hadn't been married) will have had a few partners in their time. Nout wrong in that at all.


I am not a massive Ulrika fan, but I do hink she has had a lot of really harsh treatment just cos she's had a few boyfriends.

Strawbs

Strawbs

Posted
Posted

I dont see what all the fuss about her is really, granted im not from this land so only have limited knowledge but as far as I know she has had 4 kids by 4 dads but is a good mum and very open about her history.. not quite sure why she gets crucified for that..


ho hum...


oh and NO WAY will I be watching the BB.. I hear in Australia its been banned, lets hope the rest of the world follows suit!

bignumber5

bignumber5

Posted
Posted

Despite my aforeposted jowly remark, i thought she was looking good on her years, and naturally so, sans botox, surgery etc.


As for the judgement on her personal life, i don't give it a great deal of thought, but she is a part of a special club of famous ladies with entry requirements as follows: if they weren't famous, social services would (post Climbie-Report) be keeping an eye, but they're famous so hello/heat mag can do it instead. Other members include the infamous Katona woman.


I'm not suggesting that there's anything wrong with having 4 kids by 4 fathers per-se, it's just an observation of an apparent imbalance as alluded to by Mockers.


(edit for typos)

Moos

Moos

Posted
Posted

Er, quite - think you answered your own point there, Mockers.


Re: Shooting Stars, did anyone else laugh till they nearly peed at the Simon Cowell / bear whathavetheygotincommon? Other than that, it was a bit of a sigh-inducing trip down Memory Lane.. and like dear old Viz just not nearly as funny as it used to be?


edit to say ffs, what's that BN5? Why would social services be involved? Social services get involved when you don't feed/wash/generally take care of your kids.. anyone accusing Ulrika of that??

Keef

Keef

Posted
Posted
Didn't want to make this about social standing, but don't think the mere fact she's a celebrity has anything to do with anything. The fact is, she chose to have her kids, and she can afford to care for them, good on her. Noone has mentioned the 4 dads who have left the mother of their children alone again once things looked like getting serious!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • HeadNun
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • Sephiroth
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • HeadNun
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • Rockets
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By Rockets · Posted

      To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...