Jump to content

Logs made from gold bars


Miss P

Recommended Posts

I went for a long walk round Dulwich Park & East Dulwich as I am a huge fan of snow. I came home via Lordship Lane & saw that Franklins were selling bags of logs. I thought I'd check out how much they were. ?11!!!! For a bag of logs the same size that is sold at the Texaco for around a fiver. I thought I'd misheard her - 11 quid for a bag of logs & ?4.50 for kindling - an absolute rip off. So I went straight to the DIY shop and bought coal, kindling & firelighters from them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the land of the credit crunch instigators society. AKA ILLUMINATI Minions Brigade.....LOL!


Chequered Flooring with Setsquares, Compus, and Dorian Pillars.


Beware if you visit somebodys house and the decor looks this way.


Shhhh, there's one across the hall from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sidll Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know what you have against Franklins but

> there is a pretty clear sign saying logs ?5.50 a

> bag which is pretty average fro London



That would make sense... ?11 for TWO bags perhaps? Maybe the OP shouldn't be so hasty to bash a local business???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked the lady who was working in the shop. I said "How much are the logs?" She said, "?11 a bag." I honestly have nothing against Franklins - I buy fresh veg from there regularly. Maybe she was confused or meant ?11 for two bags, but that's not what she told me. ?5.50 sounds average for ED.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texaco sell soft wood logs......?4.00 ish....burn quicker


Franklins sell Kentish hardwood logs....? 5.50.......burn lots longer, supports rural coppicing practices..


Home base sell hardwood logs...?5.68.........well you figure it out


Good luck to Franklins........if like that kinda gaff....


Simple question.....is LSL getting better...or worse..........


Woof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not wishing to pour cold water on Pommie's kind offer to Miss P but we do live in a smokeless zone - introduced to prevent pollution and at its worst, smogs, I believe. I don't think the Clean Air Act has been revoked.


That means you might be OK burning dry, seasoned wood but burning just-cut, wet wood is an absolute no no and some would say anti-social as well as illegal.


Just found this - no idea if the facts stated are correct: Approved wood burning stoves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I burn both logs and coal in my stove - I appreciate that we are supposed to be in a smokeless zone but it saves me using anything like as much central heating (which obviously runs on fossil fuels) because of it's much greater heat efficiency and it's not as though London buses & lorries have converted to LPG which would make a much bigger difference to air quality.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not wishing to pour cold water on Pommie's kind

> offer to Miss P but we do live in a smokeless zone

> - introduced to prevent pollution and at its

> worst, smogs, I believe. I don't think the Clean

> Air Act has been revoked.


Yes we do. And today there are many multi-fuel stoves that comply with these laws (i.e. you can use them in smokeless zones to burn wood, as the emissions fall below the limits).


Examples of approved models include the Owl, Badger and Squirrel models from Morso, for example. Which are also fab stoves. But installing a stove also usually means lining the chimney (after sweeping it) for both efficiency and safety reasons.


Stoves burn wood are *much* more efficiently than open fires: you'll get 4x the heat in the room for the same amount of fuel.


Of course, unseasoned wood should never be put on a fire. All horrible fumes and smoke and no heat.


A good source of cheap logs from sustainable sources is Logs for London. They deliver to south London. (Maybe split a 3/4 ton load with a neighbour?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The going rate for a 10Kg bag of smokeless fuel is usually ?4.99. Logs about the same. This works out at ?499 a tonne. This seems an incredible price. Even trying to buy in bulk on-line gives little or no discount unless you place a very large order. I run a local pub and at this time of tear it is necessary to have open fires. So if you are lucky enough to sip your pint in front of a roaring fire in your local, spare a thought for the poor landlord paying ?10-?20 a day for fuel per fire.

If only some local forester would give me some unwanted logs from nearby woodland.

Regardless of cost, an open fire is a welcoming sight to my customers. I just hate the prospect of having to put the prices up to pay for this, what with the brewers increases in the pipeline: Stella 7%, Guinness 5.4%, Scottish & Newcastle 5.7%(Fosters, John Smiths, Strongbow). Over the last year duty on beer has gone up 17.8%. If I passed on all the recent increases I would have to charge more than you pay in Lordship Lane for your pint. I could get away with a 20-30p increase for private functions but my regulars would not be happy. Such an increase would still be cheaper than LL. To me the pub is one of our greatest cultural traditions and it saddens me seeing them close forever, even those I regard as competitors.

So if you want a pint for ?2.70 seek out those back street places away from the noise and heartlessness of bars such as (name deleted for legal reasons) and get some value in your glass.(And stay warm by the fire).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Logs for London charges 120 quid for 3/4 of a ton.

> They deliver across south London.


Heavy load / cheap price = not particularly well seasoned firewood though, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the Logs for London info, Louisiana, most useful. Just to clarify, I do have an approved wood burner, and as I'm at home during the day at the moment, it's got to make sense to light a fire & keep one room warm as opposed to putting the heating on for the whole house. I do also buy smoke free coal, and I let wood dry out before trying to burn it in order to keep the smoke down as much as possible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) So tell us about it. it seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months?  You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says  “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions that are actual question. You ducked and deflected my two simple questions for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘when did you stop beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle.    
    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...