Jump to content

Recommended Posts

With the weather set to stay fairly cold, how about if people salt/grit or clear the pavements in front of their houses/flats? I hope to shovel a bunch out of the way this evening as the sun is shining, the temp is rising, and it will be a good time to break up the ice...with all the old and young and less steady walking down my road it might be helpful...


c,mon group effort...let's go!


otto

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5165-lets-clear-the-icy-pavement/
Share on other sites

Otto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With the weather set to stay fairly cold, how

> about if people salt/grit or clear the pavements

> in front of their houses/flats? I hope to shovel

> a bunch out of the way this evening as the sun is

> shining, the temp is rising, and it will be a good

> time to break up the ice...with all the old and

> young and less steady walking down my road it

> might be helpful...


Good Idea!...just like 30/40 years ago when that was standard to take that personal responsibility, which then helped The wider Community, accordingly.

>

> c,mon group effort...let's go!

>

> otto

People Power - Just do it! We can...we can...just do it all by ourselves!


I just poured a 57p. big thing of table salt outside this morning and the pleasures of the snap crackle pop noises were well worth the 57p...


C'mon - Group Effort!!!


Help yourselves, help your neighbors, help the elderly!


Go Go GO...Snap Crackle Pop....

chris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why don't the council deposit piles of grit in the

> street we could clear the paths ourselves.


I walked past a few big piles this morning, but suspect they are primarily intended for the street cleaners, who have been out in force both mornings I have walked down Forest Hill Road at 7am, shovelling grit onto/into the pavement.

Out of interest, the reason people stopped clearing the pathway outside their own houses was that a court case demonstrated that if someone slipped on a path where attempts had been made to clear ice and snow, then the person who had attempted (and obviously failed) to make such a clearance (failed because the claimant slipped) was liable for damages - where no attempts had been made the walker was expected to take suitable care and any falls were on their own head (or bottom, or wherever).


So, people stopped doing the decent thing in case someone else decided to go for the jackpot.


Problem of our (imported) litigation culture, not helped by day-time ads offering no win no fees support from the legal sewers, or do I mean sue-ers?

Penguin68 Wrote:

Problem of our (imported) litigation culture, not helped by day-time ads offering no win no fees support from the legal sewers, or do I mean sue-ers?


Exactly.

Sean touched on this point in the "Peckham Rye Closed" thread by saying its not just The Council or other parties fault, sometimes its the fear of potential litigation.

Sadly Penguin68 is correct that if you don't clear the pavement and someone slips over they can sue the council but if you do clear it and someone slips over afterwards then they can sue you for making the pavement dangerous.


It is a stupid situation to be in, and in the states if you don't clear your sidewalk you get fined by the local government officials


To be honest I would prefer it if we were allowed to clear it without fear of recriminations but there you go...

As an aside though I do not want to drift off topic, it is exactly the opposite in America. One can be sued for not clearing a pavement if someone is injured. But, most people clear the pavement after a snow because it is the sensible thing to do, rather than out of fear of litigation. It is done as good neighborliness.


But all that aside, let's go, shovel in hand, out there...and conquer it!

Just be very very careful out there, a huge chunk of ice/snow just dropped off my roof onto the neighbours roof and then onto the ground! Was quite scary because it made such a loud noise that the people at the bus stop across the road were looking to see where the noise came from! I am so glad I was not out there putting the recycle things into the bins, I'll think I'll stay indoors!

My pavement is a death trap, lots and lots of black ice and on the road which everyone crosses to get to the bus stop.

I don't have salt or sand:(

Same here, the safest bits are where there are still 8 inches of snow, uncompacted, uncleared. The treacherous bits are the expanses of ice and/or compacted snow. The ice is often just where there was nothing but a bit of water on the surface when the temparature fell last night.


This morning I went down my hill by clutching fences, walls etc, really slowly, skidding all over the place where people had tried to clear. Now I've just watched someone in the next road (which I look down on) practically on all fours trying to get out into the road without falling over on compacted and 'cleared' snow/ice. The snow is much easier.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I read in the Metro that if people started

> gritting the road without consent they'd face

> legal action from their local authority.


No - they could get sued by people who slip over on the bit that had been poorly gritted not by the council.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...